Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:49:39.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Architecture of the Sultanate of Ma'bar in Madura, and other Muslim Monuments in South India1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2009

Mehrdad Shokoohy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the fourteenth century on the Travancore coast of South India an independent Muslim sultanate was established which lasted for less than half a century, and was eventually terminated by the newly established neighbouring kingdom of Vijayanagar. The short, brutal and enigmatic period of this sultanate has attracted the attention of a number of modern scholars who have tried to put together its history through study of the coins, a few inscriptions, and the brief, often dismissive remarks found in the North Indian histories, as well as, most informative of all, the travel account of Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, who visited the region when the power of the sultanate was at its peak. However, none of these studies agrees even in the number and chronology of the sultans, let alone the details of the events: a confusion which is a direct result of the lack of adequate information at the present time. Under the circumstances it may appear presumptuous to embark on a description of the architectural monuments of this sultanate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , April 1991 , pp. 31 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This article is a revised and extended version of a paper read to the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland on 12 October 1989. The study was initiated in 1988 and the field work was carried out by the author and Natalie H. Shokoohy in India in the summers of 1988 and 1990. At the time of the survey measured drawings of the monuments of Madura, and sketch drawings of the buildings of Calicut were made. Bahrain Leissi helped in the preparation of the final drawings in London. The research has been supported by the Leverhulme Trust and the Society for South Asian Studies.

References

2 For modern numismatic and historical studies on the Sultanate of Ma'bar see Rodgers, C. J.,“Coins of kings of Ma'bar”, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal (JASB), LXIV, i (1895), pp. 49–54Google Scholar; Chari, T. M. Ranga and Chari, T. Desika, “Some unpublished Ma'bar coins”, Indian Antiquary, xxxi (05 1902), pp. 231–3Google Scholar; Hultzsch, E., “The coinage of the sultans of Madura”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (JRAS), 1909, II, pp. 667—83CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ahmad, Shamsuddin, A Supplement to Volume II of the Catalogue of Coins in the Indian Museum, Calcutta (the Sultans of Delhi and their Contemporaries), Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) (Delhi, 1939), pp. 77—87Google Scholar; Husaini, S. A. Q., “The chronology of the first two sultans of Madura”, The Proceedings of the Pakistan History Conference (Fifth Session) held at Khairpur under the auspices of the Pakistan Historical Society (1955), pp. 193—6Google Scholar; Husaini, S. A. Q., “The history of Madura Sultanate” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Pakistan (JASP), II (1957), pp. 90–130Google Scholar. A copper coin of ‘Alā al-Dīn Udaujī found later than the dates of the above studies has also been reported in the Annual Report on Indian Epigraphy (ARIE) (1965–1966), p. 211, no. E206Google Scholar. For the main historical studies see Rangachari, V., “The history of the Naik kingdom of Madura”, Indian Antiquary, XLIII (01 1914), pp. 1–6Google Scholar; Aiyangar, S. Krishnaswami, South India and her Muḥammadan Invaders (New Delhi, not dated but c. 1921)Google Scholar; Husain, Mahdi, “A short history of Ma'bar”, Indo-Iranica, VIII, i (03 1955), pp. 13–23Google Scholar; Husain, Mahdi, Tughluq Dynasty (Calcutta, 1963), pp. 108–9, 196–7, 242–5, 600–6Google Scholar; Devakunjari, D., Madurai through the Ages (Madras, 1979), pp. 155–69.Google Scholar

3 Muḥammad b. ‘Abd’ullāh called Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, Tuḥfat al-nuẓẓārft gharā'ib al-amsār wa ‘ajā’ib al-asfār, ed. Harb, Talal (Beirut, 1987), pp. 500—1, 605–11.Google Scholar

4 Ḥudūd al-‘ālam min al- mashriq ila’l-maghrib, ed. Sotoodeh, M. (Tehran, 1962), p. 66Google Scholar; Abū Isḥāq Ibrahim b. Muḥammad al-Istakrī, al-Masālik wa al-mamālik (Arabic text), (Cairo, 1961), pp. 102, 104–5Google Scholar; Masālik wa mamālik (Persian text), ed. Afshar, I. (Tehran, 1961), pp. 147, 151Google Scholar; Abū ‘Abd’ullāh Muĥammad b. Aḥmad al- Muqaddasī, Aḥsan al-taqāsīm fi ma'rifat al-aqālīm (Leiden, 1906), pp. 477, 484, 486Google Scholar; Abū ‘Abd’ullah Muḥammad b. Muhammad al-Idrīsī, Opus Geographicum (Napoli-Roma, 1971), pp. 185–98.Google Scholar

5 Bozorg fils de Chahriyār de Rāmhormoz, Livre des marveilles de l'inde (Kitāb-i ‘aja’ ib al-hind) (Leiden, 1983–1986), pp. 94, 105, 157–8.Google Scholar

6 al-Baghdādī, ‘Abd al-Laṭīf, Kitāb al-ifāda wa al-i'tibār (Damascus, 1983), p. 30.Google Scholar

7 Yule, Henry, The Book of Ser Marco Polo, the Venetian Concerning the Kingdoms and Marvels of the East (3rd edn. revised by Cordier, H., London, 1903), ii, pp. 296, 337, 603.Google Scholar

8 Abu'l-Khair, Rashīd al-Dīn Faḍl'ullāh b.‘Imād al-daula, Jāmi' al-tawārīkh, facsimile of Persian and Arabic texts in Jahn, Karl, Rashīd al-Dīn's History of India (The Hague, 1965),Google Scholar Arabic MS of 714/1314–15 (Royal Asiatic Society) fo. 2063, Persian MS of 717/1317–18 (Tup Qapu), fo. 335–6, Persian MS of 833/1429–30 (British Museum), fo. 384; also see Yule, Henry, “An endeavour to elucidate Rashiduddin's geographical notices of India”, JRAS, New Series, iv (1870), pp. 345–56.Google Scholar

9 The monopoly of the horse trade in Ma'bar by the Muslims has also been described by Marco Polo, see Yule, Henry, The Book of Ser Marco Polo (London, 1903), ii, p. 340.Google Scholar

10 The names differ in different MSS. Waṣṣāf, who records similar information gives the name as Taqī al-Dīn, see ‘Abd’ullāh b. Faḍl'ullāh al-Shirāzī known as Waṣṣaf, , Tazjiyat al-amṣar wa tajriyat al-a'ṣār (Bombay, 1269 (1852–1853)), iii, p. 302.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., 301–9; also see Elliot, H. M. and Dowson, J., The History of India as Told by its Own Historians, the Muḥammadan Period (London, 1871), iii, pp. 32, 34–5, 45–7Google Scholar; Cordier's note in Yule, Henry, The Book of Ser Marco Polo (3rd ed. revised by Cordier, H., London, 1903), ii, p. 333.Google Scholar

12 ‘Imād al-Dīn Ismā’īl b. ‘Alī known as Abu'1-Fidā, Taqwīm al-buldān, Pers. tr. by Ayati, A. (Tehran, 1970), pp. 401–3, 410–11.Google Scholar

13 Waṣṣaf, , op. cit., iv, p. 527Google Scholar; Dihlawī, Amīr Khusrau, Khazā'in al-futūḥ, ed. Haq, Syid Moinul, Aligarh, no date but c. 1927, p. 174.Google Scholar

14 Ḍiyā' al-Dīn Barnī, Tārīkh-i Firūz Shāhī (Calcutta, 1862), p. 283.Google Scholar

15 Dihlawī, Amīr Khusrau, op. cit., 126Google Scholar. On his return Kāfūr was received by the sultan on Monday 4th of Jumāda II, 711/18 October, 1311, ibid., p. 181.

16 Ibid., p. 172.

17 Ibid., p. 174; Khusrau, Amīr, Duval Rānī Khiḍr Khān, facsimile copy of a manuscript published for the 700th anniversary of Amīr Khusrau (Lahore, 1975), folio 8 obverse.Google Scholar

18 Khusrau, Amīr, Khazā'in al-futūḥ, Aligarh, c. 1927, p. 144Google Scholar; Iṣāmī, Futūḥ al-salatīn, ed. Husain, A. Mahdi (Agra, 1938), p. 287.Google Scholar

19 Muḥammad Qāsim b. Hindū Shāh known as Firishta, Tārīkh-i Firishta (Lucknow, 1864), i, p. 120.Google Scholar

20 Barnī, Ḍiyā' al-Dīn, op. cit., pp. 398—9Google Scholar; Firishta, , op. cit., i, p. 126.Google Scholar

21 Lal, Rai Bahadur Hira, Descriptive list of inscriptions in the Central Provinces and Berar (Nagpur, 1916), p. 51Google Scholar, inscription no. 71; also see 52, inscription no. 75; Verma, B. D., “Inscriptions from the Central Museum, Nagpur”, Epigraphia Indica, Arabic and Persian Supplement (EIAPS) (1955–1956), pp. 109–12.Google Scholar

22 Barnī, Ḍiyā' al-Dīn, op. cit., pp. 480–1Google Scholar; Yaḥyā b. Aḥmad b. ‘Abd’ ullah al-Sihrindī, Tārīkh-i Mubārak Shāhī (Calcutta, 1931), p. 106Google Scholar; ‘Isāmī, , op. cit., pp. 449–51Google Scholar; Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, , op. cit., ii, pp. 78–9.Google Scholar

23 Ibid.

24 JRAS, 1909, pl. facing 680, no. 2Google Scholar; JASP, 1957, p. 127, pl. 12, no. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 The date of 742/1341–2 given by Aḥmad, Yaḥyā b., op. cit., p. 106Google Scholar, and Firishta, , op. cit., i, p. 137Google Scholar is therefore much too late.

26 Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, , op. cit., p. 498.Google Scholar

27 The date of the earliest coins may be read as 734, see JASB, 1909, p. 673CrossRefGoogle Scholar, coin no. 5; Ahmad, Shamsuddin, op. cit., p. 81, n. 4Google Scholar; JASP, 1957, p. 127, no. 2.Google Scholar

28 The name Udauj appears on his coins. Ibn Baṭṭūṭa records the name as Udaijī.

29 Pope, A. U. (ed.), A Survey of Persian Art (London and Tokyo, 1964–1965), ii, pp. 579–83.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., iii, pp. 933–4.

31 JASP (1957), pp. 110–15.Google Scholar

32 Sirāj ‘Afīf, Shams, Tārīkh-i Fīrūz Shāhī (Calcutta, 1981), pp. 261–3Google Scholar. Elliot's translation of this passage is incomplete and inaccurate, see Elliot, H. M. and Dowson, J., The History of India as Told by its Own Historians (London, 1871), iii, p. 339.Google Scholar

33 ARIE, 1963–1964, p. 85, B. 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Madhurāvijayam of Gangā Dēvi, ed. Thiruvenkatachari, S. (Annamalainagar, 1957), pp. 68–71, 121–26.Google Scholar

35 The large amount of Roman pottery and currency found in south India shows the extent of the trade via this sea route even in ancient times. See Wheeler, R. E. M. et al. , “Arikamedu, an Indo Roman trading station on the east coast of India”, Ancient India, II (07, 1946), pp. 116–19.Google Scholar

36 Our town plan of Tughluqābād is the author's survey based on aerial photographs. The town has not yet been fully studied, but for an earlier report see Waddington, Hilary, “‘Ādilābād a part of the fourth Delhi”, Ancient India, I (1946), pp. 60–76.Google Scholar

37 Schlumberger, Daniel, Lashkari Bazar, une résidence royale ghaznévide et ghoride, Mémoires de la délégation archéologique française en Afghanistan, XVIII, Part 2 - Plates (Paris, 1978), pl. 2.Google Scholar

38 Kiani, M. Y. (ed.), A General Study on Urbanization and Urban Planning in Iran (Tehran, 1986), p. 229.Google Scholar

39 See in particular the plan of Qalāt and Līvār, ibid., 90, 92; also see Kleiss, W., “Erkundungsfahrten in Iran”, Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, iv (1971), pp. 51–64.Google Scholar

40 Khan, F. A., Banbhore, a Preliminary Report on the Recent Archaeological Excavations at Banbhore (fourth edition, Karachi, 1976), p. 8.Google Scholar

41 Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, , op. cit., p. 558Google Scholar, describes the three parts of Daulatābād; for a town plan see Michell, George (ed.), Islamic Heritage of the Deccan (Bombay, 1986), p. 18.Google Scholar

42 Ibid., p. 28.

43 Yazdani, G., Bidar, its History and Monuments (Oxford, 1947), map of Bidar.Google Scholar

44 Petruccioli, Attilio, La citta' del sole e delle acque Fathpur Sikri (Roma, 1988), p. 34, fig. 7.Google Scholar

45 Langles, L., Monuments anciens et modernes de l'Hindustan (Paris, 1821), i, figure facing p. 98.Google Scholar

46 Acharya, Parasanna Kumar, Architecture of Mānasāra, iv (New Delhi, 1980), pp. 63–98Google Scholar; Ananthalwar, M. A. and Rea, Alexander (eds.) and Iyer, A. V. Thiagaraja (compiler), Indian architecture, i (1980), pp. 158–73.Google Scholar

47 Richard Owen Cambridge, An Account of the War in India between the English and French on the Coast of Coromandel from the Year 1750 to the Year 1760 (London, 1761), pl. VII, facing p. 105.Google Scholar

48 Our map is based on Map of Madura region, Army Map Service, Washington D.C., 1968, map no. NC44–9.

49 Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, , op. cit., p. 607.Google Scholar

50 For the forms of South Indian columns and brackets see Jouveau-Dubreuil, G., Archéologie du sud de l'Inde, I, Architecture, Annales du Musée Guimet, Bibliothèque d'études, xxvi (Paris, 1914), pp. 59–60, 137–40.Google Scholar

51 Fergusson, J., History of Indian and Eastern architecture, revised by Burgess, James (London, 1910), i, p. 363Google Scholar; Balasubrahmanyam, S. R., Middle Chola Temples (Faridabad, Haryana, 1975), p. 20Google Scholar; Sivaramamurti, C., The Chola Temples, ASI (New Delhi, 1984), p. 17.Google Scholar

52 Page, J. A., A Memoir on Kotla Firoz Shah, Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India, LII (1937), pp. 33–42,Google Scholar Persian text 3–25; Shokoohy, M., Haryana I, the Column of Firūz Shāh and Other Inscriptions from the District of Hisar, Corpus Inscriptionum Iranicarum, Part iv, XLVII (London, 1988), pp. 18–19Google Scholar; Shokoohy, M. and Shokoohy, N. H., Ḥiṣār-i Fīrūza, London, 1988, pp. 32–5.Google Scholar

53 Yule, H., “An endeavour to elucidate Rashiduddin's geographical notices of India”, JRAS, New Series IV (1870), p. 347.Google Scholar

54 Burgess, J., The Architecture of Ahmadabad, Part I, Archaeological Survey of Western India, vii (London, 1900), pp. 46–51, 54–7, 61, pls. 56, 67, 74.Google Scholar

55 Shokoohy, M., Bhadreśvar, the Oldest Islamic Monuments in India (Leiden and New York, 1988), pp. 25–33.Google Scholar

56 Ibid., pp. 19–25.

57 Ibid., pp. 42–9.

58 Wetzel, Friedrich, Islamische Grabbauten in Indien (Ausgabe, 1918, reprinted Osnabrück, 1970), pp. 15–23Google Scholar; Yamamoto, Tatsuro, Ara, Matsuo and Tsukinowa, Tokifusa, Delhi, Architectural Remains of the Sultanate Period (Tokyo, 1967), i, pp. 82–4, T. 80–91.Google Scholar

59 Shajara-yi mubārak-i āl-i nabī rasūl aulād-i quṭāb al-aqṭāb qāḍī al-Islām muftī al-inām haḍrat-i jināb-i Qādī Sayyid Tāj al-Dīn, Madras, undated but compiled in 1955 and printed after 1966, pp. 2–5, 7, 22.Google Scholar

60 Creswell, K. A. C., Early Muslim Architecture (Oxford, 1969), 1, i, p. 100, fig. 374Google Scholar: Fehérvá;ri, Gza and Hutt, Anthony, “The Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem and the importance of the Miḥrāb Suleyman”, Arab Architecture Past and Present (Durham, 1983), pp. 10–12.Google Scholar

61 Marshall, John, The monuments of Muslim India, Cambridge History of India, iii, p. 581, pl. 6 no. 11Google Scholar, Shokoohy, M., Rajasthan I, Corpus Inscriptionum Iranicarum, Part IV, XLIX (London, 1986), pp. 12–13, pl. la.Google Scholar

62 Ibid., pp. 55–6, pl. 51.

63 Scerrato, Umberto et al. , “Archaeological activities in the Yemen Arab Republic”, East and West, xxxv, iv (1985), pp. 375—82,Google Scholar figs. 38, 48. Foundations of a mosque with a similar plan have also been found in Sīrāf, see Whitehouse, David, “Excavations at Sīrāf”, sixth interim report, Iran, XII (1974), p. 16, fig. 8.Google Scholar

64 Whitehouse, D., “Excavations at Sīrāf, fourth interim report”, Iran, ix (1971), pp. 11–12, fig. 5Google Scholar; “Fifth interim report”, Iran, x (1972), pp. 82–5, fig. 13Google Scholar; D. Whitehouse, “Staircase minarets on the Persian Gulf”, ibid., pp. 155–8.

65 The final report of the excavations at Ghubayrā, in which the mosque is described, has not yet been published. In the interim reports the mosque, known locally as the Dargāh, has been referred to as a gatehouse or a throne room. See Bivar, A. D. H. and Fehervari, G., “Excavations at Ghubayrā, 1971, first interim report”, JRAS, 1974, p. 112, fig. 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Survey of excavations in Iran, 1973–4”, Iran, XIII (1975), p. 181, pls. VI a and VIbGoogle Scholar; Proceedings of the third annual symposium on archaeological research in Iran(Tehran, 1974), pp. 257—8, fig. 5.Google Scholar

66 A few of the Islamic inscriptions of Calicut have been reported previously but their texts have not yet been published. See ARIE, 1947–1948, p. 13, no. B. 94Google Scholar; 1965–6, pp. 19–20, 136–7, nos. D. 52–67, p. 142, no. D. 114. For a brief report on the monuments see Kuttiammu, T. P., “The mosques of Kerala”, Splendours of Kerala (Marg, Bombay, 1983), pp. 111—15.Google Scholar

67 Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, , op. cit., p. 575.Google Scholar

68 Sarkar, H., Monuments of Kerala, ASI (New Delhi, 1978), p. 49.Google Scholar

69 Firishta, , op. cit., ii, pp. 369–70.Google Scholar

70 Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, , op. cit., p. 572.Google Scholar

71 Correa, Gaspar, The Three Voyages of Vasco da Gama, tr. Stanley, Henry E. J. (London, 1869), pp. 209–14, 330, 373Google Scholar; Cidade, Hernani (ed.) and Múrias, Manuel (historical notes), Ásia de joäo de Barros (Lisbo, 1945), i, 156–65.Google Scholar

72 Ibid., ii, pp. 153–63; Affonso Dalboquerque the Younger, The Commentaries of the Great Dalboquerque, Second Viceroy of India, tr. by Birch, Walter de Gray, (London, 1875), ii, pp. 64–71Google Scholar. This records that the palace of Calicut was set on fire, and also that the Marshal ordered a mosque near the city to be burnt, but does not make it clear if the order was carried out.

73 Firishta, , op. cit., ii, p. 372Google Scholar.

74 Affonso Dalboquerque the Younger, op. cit., iv, 1884, pp. 61–75.Google Scholar

75 Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, , op. cit., p. 572.Google Scholar

76 Bernier, Ronald M., The temples of Nepal (revised edn., New Delhi, 1978), pp. 29–31Google Scholar; Korn, Wolfgang, The traditional architecture of the Kathmandu Valley (Kathmandu, 1979) p. 111.Google Scholar

77 ARIE, 1965–1966, p. 136, nos. D. 53–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

78 The word shayyad literally means resurfacing the walls with plaster, but can also mean renovation, restoration, and sometimes making additions to a building, see Steingass, F., Arabic-English Dictionary (London, no date but c. 1884), p. 566, under the word śād.Google Scholar

79 Si‘rd or Si‘rdh is also recorded by Abu'l-Fidā, , op. cit., pp. 324–5,Google Scholar as Si‘rt and Is‘irdh.

80 The title al-Kanafī, “of the coasts”, must refer to the reputation of the family in maritme trade.

81 The inscription has so far remained unreported and needs further study. Our reading of the name was made on site.

82 Singh, Madanjeet, The Cave Paintings of Ajanta (London, 1965), pp. 74–5, 130–1, pls. 35, 60Google Scholar; Ghosh, A., Ajanta Murals, ASI (New Delhi, 1967), pls. 47, 83.Google Scholar

83 Golmohammadi, Javad, “Wooden religious buildings and carved woodwork in central Iran”, unpublished PhD thesis, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1989, pp. 123, 255—7, Pls. 36, 40, 88.Google Scholar

84 Scerrato, U. et al. , “Report on the 3rd campaign for typological survey of the Islamic religious architecture in North Yemen”, East and West, xxxvi, vi (1986), p. 428, figs. 61–2.Google Scholar

85 The inscription is unpublished, our reading was made on site, and from a photograph, not reproduced here.

86 The inscription is unpublished but was reported in ARIE, 1965–1966, p. 136 no. D. 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

87 Burgess, James, Mohammadan Architecture of Bharoch, Cambay, Dholka, Champanir and Mahmudabad in Gujarat, Archaeological Survey of Western India, vi (London, 1896), pp. 30–4, pls. 34, 37, 42–3.Google Scholar

88 Reported in ARIE, 1947–1948, p. 13, no. B. 94Google Scholar; 1965–6, p. 137, no. D. 137; a photograph of the inscription is produced in Kuttiammu, T. P., op. cit., p. 114, fig. 2.Google Scholar

89 The inscription has not been reported previously.

90 ARIE, 1965–1966, p. 137, no. D. 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Our information is based on our reading on site, and a photograph, not reproduced here.