^{page 144 note 1} All the characters with … beneath are written small (i.e. as glosses) in the original.

^{page 145 note 1} D.P. = determinative prefix (the character ).

^{page 145 note 2} I.e. read the name Nur-îli in this (the explanatory) column.

^{page 145 note 3} This is part of the name of the character which occupied the gap above.

^{page 146 note 1} Thus according to my first transcription, but on revising the text I copied instead of , šu, with the note “lu (?) or Zu (?).” That my first reading is correct, however, is shown by the text Bu. 91–5–9, 704, lines 1 and 2, where the name is given as Šu-ul-la-at. See the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1899, p. 103, lines 1 and 2 of the translation, where, however, we ought to read, apparently, Nûr-îli and Šullat, in accordance with 1. 24, above.

^{page 146 note 2} Apparently to be completed .

^{page 146 note 3} The numbers indicate that the word sakkan is to be repeated in every case.

^{page 147 note 1} Slightly doubtful—there is an erasure here.

^{page 147 note 2} Or two words, Aššu irdu.

^{page 148 note 1} ‘Filibuster,’ from the English flyboat, is an example of a word which has been borrowed and re-borrowed in a similar way.

^{page 148 note 2} As stands also for wi, Îlu-wir, as well as Îlu-mir (or -mer), is possible.

^{page 148 note 3} Sumerian digir or dingir (see line 7 of the translation below). The usage in the lists and in the spoken language, it is to be noted, may have differed.

^{page 149 note 1} The name of the group is given as digir ()-silaku .

^{page 149 note 2} The name of the group is given as nigginakku, digir () being omitted, probably because indicated in the preceding line.

^{page 149 note 3} Or (? perhaps) But -ilana.

^{page 149 note 4} The catchline, giving the first line of the fourth tablet.