^{page 114 note 1} In this sense the word is found in several passages of the Virāṭaparvan, etc.

^{page 114 note 2} Thus Jolly's text; I prefer, however, to read nityaṃ.

^{page 115 note 1} As for śreyaḥketo in AV. v, 20, 10, I cannot believe with Mr. Johnston that it is really a vocative of śreyaḥketu. The Prātiśākhya (ii, 62) is certainly right in explaining it as a nominative. However, Whitney's, translation (Atharva-Veda, p. 256)Google Scholar, as often happens with him, is far from the point, as śreyaḥketodoes not mean “aiming at advantage” but “abode of glory”

^{page 116 note 1} Cf. vidhūtalatā = vigatatanhā, Nettipak. 141 (PTS. Pāli Diet, wrongly 121).

^{page 116 note 2} Cf. also MrsDavids, Rhys, JPTS. 1907, 130Google Scholar.

^{page 116 note 3} Hultzsch, , ZDMG. lxxii, 120Google Scholar, wanted to read sukuloditena, which does not materially help us.

^{page 116 note 4} Notes on the Saundarananda, 2nd Series, p. 9 sq.

^{page 117 note 1} Cf. madasamīraṇa and balasamīraṇa as epithets of pāna (quoted from the Epics in PW.).

^{page 118 note 1} Thus—not ii, 249, as misprinted in the PTS. Päli Dict.

^{page 119 note 1} *kāhṣa in Wackernagel, , Ai. Gr. ii, 1, 84Google Scholar, consequently should be altered into kāhṣa.