No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
Controversy continues over the position of the paribhāṣās in the textual order of the Āpastamba Śrautasūtra. The paribhāṣās occupy the first four kaṇḍikās of the 24th Praśna in the printed text edited by R. Garbe. They are regarded by Garbe as a later addition and by Narasimhachar as the initial portion of the Śrautasūtra. This paper examines the validity of their views. From a reassessment of their data combined with further grounds the present author concludes that the position in which the paribhāṣās now appear in the printed text is the original one.
1 The Śrauta Sūtra of Āpastamba, ed. DrGarbe, Richard, Bibliotheca Indica No. 92, 3 vols. (Calcutta, Asiatic Society, 1882–1902). Except where otherwise specified all references to this Śrautasútra are to this edition.Google Scholar
The following abbreviations will be used in this paper: ĀpŚS: The Āpastamba Śrautasūtra; BŚS: The Baudhāyana Śrautasútra: BhŚS: The Bhāradvāja Śrautasūtra; LŚS: The Lāṭyāyana Śrautasútra; MŚS: The Mánava Śrautasútra.
2 Kashikar, C. G. subscribes to this view without further inquiry in “A survey of the Śrautasūtras”, Journal of the University of Bombay, N.S. XXXV, 2: Arts No. 41 (09 1966), 37, 156.Google ScholarBürk, Albert in “Das Āpastamba-Śulba-Sūtra”, ZDMG, LV, 1901, 550,Google Scholar holds that owing to the close relation between the Śrauta and the Śulba Praśnas, the latter, which is now regarded as the 30th Praśna, should immediately follow the 23rd Praśna and thus constitute the 24th. But Bürk's supposition loses its force, because the relation of the Śrautasūtra is much closer to the paribhāsās, as has been demonstrated in this article.
3 ed. Vedāntavāgīśa, Ānanda Chandra, Bibliotheca Indica No. 63 (Calcutta, Asiatic Society, 1872).Google Scholar
4 ed. Āgāśe, Kāśīnātha Śāstrī and Mārūlakara, Śaṇkara Śāstrī, Anandasrama Sanskrit Series No. 53, 10 vols. (Poona, Anandasrama, 1907–1932).Google Scholar
5 ed. The Śrauta Sūtra of Apastamba, Praśnas I–V, Oriental Library Publications Sanskrit No. 87 (Mysore, University of Mysore, 1944), xxv–xxix.Google Scholar
6 According to Tālavṛntanivāsin's remark in his Prayogadīpikā, quoted by Narasimhachar, xxxiii. MS No. 2052, The Tanjore Maharaja Serfoji's Sarasvati Mahal Library (Burnell's Catalogue No. 3853), has the colophon: iti dhūrtasvāmikṛtasāmānyasūtrabhāṣyaṃ samāptim agamat. The authorship of this bhāṣya is attributed to Haradatta by A. Mahādeva Śāstrin, who says that Dhūrtasvāmin's authorship is restricted to the commentary on the first 18 Praśnas only; see “Remarks” of Sastri, P. P. S., ed. A descriptive catalogue of the Sanskrit manuscripts in the Tanjore … Library, IV (Srirangam, Tanjore M.S.S.M. Library, 1929), 1636.Google Scholar The commentary on ĀpŚS XXIV. 1–4Google Scholar ascribed to Dhūrtasvāmin by Sāmaśramin, Satyavrata in his ed. Yajñaparibhāṣāsūtra, Uṡā, Vol. I (Calcutta, Samvat, 1948),Google Scholar generally agrees with Haradatta's commentary on the same text published in Darśapūrṇamāsaprakāśaḥ by Śāstrin, Vāmana, ed. Dīkṣīta, Rāma, Anandasrama Sanskrit Series No. 93 (Poona, Anandasrama, 1924),Google Scholar though the commentaries differ at some places, especially on ĀpŚS XXIV. 1.25, 2.2, 3.1, 4. 2–4. On XXIV. 4. 7–15 and 17–21, Sāmaśramin gives the bhāṣya, whereas Haradatta's commentary on these sūtras is wanting in Darśapūrṇamāsaprakāśaḥ.