^{page 404 note 1} It must be remembered that we do not actually know that wang corresponds to šāh.

^{page 404 note 2} We may here note that Chavannes, , T'oung Pao, 1907, p. 191Google Scholar, translates the passage “he elected himself king; the name of his kingdom was Kuei-shuang”, and not “he used the dynastic title king of the Kuei-shuang”. It certainly can be translated “he used the dynastic title king of Kuei-shuang” as de Groot does. It is impossible to tell from the Chinese whether the name is of a people or their country.

^{page 404 note 3} Centralasiastische Studien I, in Sitz. Ber. d. Wien. Akad., 1887, vol. 87, pp. 155–156Google Scholar; it is accepted by Marquart, , Ērānšahr, p. 36Google Scholar, note 5.

^{page 405 note 1} Gardner, , p. 206Google Scholar, No. 29 ff.

^{page 405 note 2} Cf. Justi, , Iranisches NamenbuchGoogle Scholar, s. v.

^{page 405 note 3} Cf. Latyschew, B., Inscriptions Orae Septentrionalis Ponti Euxeni, 1885Google Scholar, etc.; Indices.

^{page 405 note 4} Kuei-shuang-wang is, equally, “king of Kuei-shuang” and “king of the Kuei-shuang”.

^{page 405 note 5} Marquait, , op. cit., p. 208.Google Scholar

^{page 406 note 1} Some at least originally genitive plurals; e.g., Gīlān, of. Gelœ, Γλαι; but this was soon lost sight of; and it must be remembered that, when an Arab geographer talks of the he means “king of Gīlān” and not “king of the Gēls”.

^{page 406 note 2} Ed. Goeje, de, p. 17.Google Scholar

^{page 406 note 3} Ed. Wüstenfeld, , iv, p. 320, 1. 15.Google Scholar

^{page 407 note 1} СΥ is supposed to be genitive of a form sa, but the form , with ă, for , is of quite modern origin.

^{page 408 note 1} For Ζ = y, cf. ΚΟΖΟΛΑ = Kuyula, ΑΖΟΥ = Ayasa; = j, ΚΟΖΟΥΛΟ = Kujula; ΖΕΙΟΝΙЅΟΥ = Jihuniasa, and for ΟΟ = w, cf. ΟΟΗΜΑ = Wima.

^{page 409 note 1} A few have the form ΟΥΟΗΡΚΙ; ΟΟΗΡΚΕ is also found.

^{page 410 note 1} N.C., 1893, pl. xv, figs. 1, 2; p. 199.

^{page 411 note 1} Whitehead, , Cat. Coins in Punjab Museum, i, p. 156Google Scholar, n. 2.