Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T10:30:23.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Men, gods and powers in the Vedic outlook

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Karel Werner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the last century the Vedic pantheon served as the best illustration of the theory that the gods of primitive and archaic religions were personifications of natural phenomena. The gods of the Vedas were seen as more recognisably such than, for example, the Greek gods, who had acquired more elaborate anthropomorphic features through Homer's poetic skill, so that their supposed natuie-substratum was hardly or not at all detectable. In India the matter seemed clear. Thus Oldenberg believed that the Vedic gods were predominantly deified Naturwesen, agents behind the great happenings and processes of nature. Moreover, he maintained that different gods in the Vedas had reached different stages of anthropomorphism and independence from their nature basis and he made much of the job of determining this degree in individual cases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 114 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 14 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

The following abbreviations are used in the present article:

BU Brhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad

HR History of Religions: an International Journal for Comparative Historical Studies. Chicago

JAOS Journal of the American Oriental Society

Religion Journal of Religion and Religions. London

RV Ṛgveda

1 Oldenberg, Hermann, Die Religionen des Veda, 5. Auflage, Darmstadt, 1970, 44ff.Google Scholar

2 Macdonell, A. A., Vedic mythology, Strassburg, 1898 (reprinted Delhi 1974), 15.Google Scholar

3 Keith, Arthur Berridale, The religion and philosophy of the Veda and Upanishads, Cambridge, Mass., 1925 (reprinted Delhi 1970), 58.Google Scholar

4 Macdonell, , 115–23Google Scholar; cf. Oldenberg, , 60–7.Google Scholar

5 Keith, , 65.Google Scholar

6 Otto, Rudolf, Das Heilige, 1917Google Scholar (English edition, The idea of the holy, Oxford, 1923).Google Scholar

7 Naturalism and religion, London, 1907.Google Scholar

8 Otto, Rudolf, Gottheit und Gottheiten der Arier, Giessen, 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Smart, Ninian, The religious experience of mankind, second edition, New York, 1976, 80.Google Scholar

10 Gonda, J., Die Religionen Indiens I, Veda und älterer Hinduismus, Stuttgart, 1960, 2–3;Google Scholar cf. Werner, Karel, “On interpreting the Vedas”, Religion, VII, 1977, 189–200, and especially 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Brown, Norman W., “The creation myth of the Rig Veda”, JAOS, LXII, 1942, 85–98.Google Scholar Also briefly in his earlier article, “The Rigvedic equivalent for Hell”, JAOS, LXI, 1941, 76–80.Google Scholar

12 Eliade, Mircea, Cosmos and history, New York, 1959, 19ff.Google Scholar; and newly again in A history of religious ideas, London, 1979, 205–8.Google Scholar

13 Gonda, , Die Religionen Indiens, I, 42.Google Scholar

14 ibid., 28.

15 Gonda, J., Some observations on the relations between “Gods” and “Powers” in the Veda, (Disputationes Rheno-Trajectinae, I), 's-Gravenhage, 1957, 6.Google Scholar

16 Gonda, , Die Religionen Indiens, I, 29.Google Scholar

17 ibid., 30–3; cf. Gonda, J., Notes on Brahman, Utrecht, 1950.Google Scholar

18 Dandekar, R. N., “God in Hindu thought”, Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute (Golden Jubilee Volume), 1968, 433–56.Google Scholar

19 ibid., 440 and 442.

20 Dandekar, R. N., Der vedische Mensch: Studien zur Selbstauffassung des Inders in Ṛgund Atharvaveda, Heidelberg, 1938.Google Scholar

21 cf. Oldenberg, , Die Religionen des Veda, 280–8Google Scholar; Macdonell, , Vedic mythology, 14–15;Google ScholarKeith, , The religion and philosophy of the Veda and Upanishads, 229–30.Google Scholar

22 Gonda, , Die Religionen Indiens, I, 55–8.Google Scholar

23 See references in n. 11, above; cf. also Kuiper, F. B. J., “Cosmogony and conception: aquery”, HR, X, 1970, 91–138.Google Scholar

24 Miller, Jeaninen, The Vedas, London, 1974, 27–41.Google Scholar

25 Brown, , “The creation myth”,JAOS, LXI, 1941, 96.Google Scholar

26 cf. Kramisch, Stella, “The triple structure of creation in the Ṛg Veda”, HR, II, 1962, 140–75 and 1963, 256–85, and especially II, 144.Google Scholar

27 Brown, , “The Rigvedic equivalent for Hell”, JAOS, LXI, 1941, 80.Google Scholar

28 cf. Gonda, J., The dual deities in the religion of the Veda, Amsterdam, 1974, 98.Google Scholar

29 See the more detailed exposition of Aditi in Werner, K., “Symbolism in the Vedas and its conceptualisation”, Numen, XXIV, 1977, 223–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 RV 10, 129Google Scholar has been commented on by scholars many times. For links with earlier cosmogonic myths see Brown, , “The Rigvedic equivalent for Hell”, JAOS, LXI, 1941, 76–80Google Scholar and Werner, , “Symbolism in the Vedas” (see n. 29, above).Google Scholar

31 For detailed exposition and references, see Werner, Karel, “The Vedic concept of human personality and its destiny”, Journal of Indian Philosophy, V, 1977, 275–89.Google Scholar

32 ibid., 276–7.

33 “Sages”, “ascetics” and “wandering mendicants”.