Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:03:27.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Art. XI.—Lecture on the present State of the Cultivation of Oriental Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

H. H. Wilson
Affiliation:
Director of the Royal Asiatic Society.

Extract

It has been judged possible, by the Council of the Royal Asiatic Society, that the objects for which the Society was founded, and for which it is maintained, may be made more generally known, and more accurately appreciated, by the adoption of arrangements of a more popular character than our ordinary proceedings, and which may interest a more numerous and varied portion of the public than the Members of the Society only, in matters concerning the Eastern World. It is not to be denied that the subjects which in a peculiar degree engage the attention of the Society,—the antiquities and literature of the nations of the East,—have hitherto failed to receive that attention from the public at large which might have been expected, if not from their own inherent interest, yet from our long and intimate intercourse with the most important countries of Asia, and the political identification of India and Great Britain. Works of high merit, elucidating Oriental literature, history, antiquities, religion, the conditions of Asiatic society in past or present times, and descriptive of the products of art or nature in the East, usually meet with a cold and discouraging reception, even from the reading world, or at most attract passing and ephemeral notice, leaving no durable impression, creating no continuous and progressive interest.

Type
Original Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1852

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 198 note 1 Communications received from Colonel Rawlinson, subsequently to the delivery of this lecture, one of which was read at the meeting of the Society of the 6th March, announce his having also independently read the same name, that of Jehu, in the inscription; and, in fact, he had long before read the same name on the obelisk, as Yahua, son of Hubiri, but he was then at a loss to identify the individual.— See Journal Royal Asiatic Society, XII., p. 447.Google Scholar