Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:27:43.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

4. On a Passage in the Bhabra Edict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

E. Hardy
E. Hardy
Affiliation:
Würzburg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 1901 , pp. 311 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1901

References

page 311 note 1 The full stop in brackets corresponds to Senart's edition, in parentheses to my proposal.

page 313 note 1 I mean Aṅguttara, vol. v, p. 191 : Yañ ca khvāssa gahapati tapaṃ tapato akusalā dhammā parihāyanti, kusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhanti, evarūpaṃ tapaṃ tapitabban ti vadāma.

page 313 note 2 Ime ca Mahāli dasa dhammā loke na saṃvijjeyyuṃ, na yidha paññāyetha : adhammacariyā visamacariyā ti vā dhammacariyā samacariyā ti vā. The reading ca is warranted by the good Mandalay MS., also by the Phayre MS., against kho in the Sinhalese MSS. and the Siamese edition.

page 314 note 1 I know no passage where the personal pronoun in the instr. oecurs connected with the verb in the active, but I see no reason to object to such a connection. Moreover, we have to supply after deseyyaṃ an acc. of the object, e.g. ekaṃ (sc. subhāsitaṃ).