Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:44:02.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

16th-century musica ficta: the importance of the scribe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2009

Roger Bray
Get access

Extract

It is idle to pretend that a complete picture of 16th-century English musica ficta practice can be built up wholly by quoting unusual examples and wondering what they mean. This article, though delayed, complements my article (Bray, 1970) in which I did this. Since we rely on manuscripts for most of our information (though, as we shall see, not even printed sources are necessarily entirely reliable), we have to consider the scribes of these manuscripts, their circumstances, sympathies, and motives. If we can discover anything about scribal practice, or even see that a source has been tampered with later, then we can begin to understand more deeply the problems involved, and eventually we may wonder a little less.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the Plainsong & Mediaeval Music Society , Volume 1 , January 1978 , pp. 57 - 80
Copyright
© The Plainsong and Medieval Music Society 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, H.K.: The Technique of Byrd's Vocal Polyphony (London, 1966)Google Scholar
Bergsagel, J.D.: ‘The Date and Provenance of the Forrest-Heyther Collection of Tudor Masses’, Music and Letters, 44 (1963), p.240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsagel, J.D. (ed.): Nicholas Ludford: Complete Works I, CMM, xxvii/l (1963)Google Scholar
Bray, R.: ‘The Interpretation of Musica Ficta in English Music, c. 1490 to c. 1580’, Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association, 97 (1970–1971), p.29 [see also Doe]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, R.: ‘The Part-Books Oxford Christ Church MSS 979–83: An Index and Commentary’, Musica Disciplina, 25 (1971), p.179 Google Scholar
Bray, R.: ‘British Library RM 24 d 2 (John Baldwin's Commonplace Book): An Index and Commentary’, Royal Musical Association Research Chronicle, 12 (1974), p.31 Google Scholar
Bray, R.: ‘John Baldwin’, Music and Letters, 56 (1975), p.55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, G.: ‘The Provenance and Date of the Caius and Lambeth Choirbooks’, Music and Letters, 51 (1970), p.107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CMM – Corpus Mensurabilis Musicae (American Institute of Musicology, Rome) [see Bergsagel, Warren]Google Scholar
DNB – Dictionary of National Biography (London)Google Scholar
Doe, P. (ed.): Early Tudor Magnificats, EECM, iv (1962)Google Scholar
Doe, P.: ‘Another View of Musica Ficta in Tudor Music’, Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association, 98 (1971–1972), p.113 [see also Bray, 1970]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EECM – Early English Church Music (London) [see Doe, Sandon]Google Scholar
Fellowes, E.H. (ed.): The Collected Works of William Byrd (London, 1937, etc.)Google Scholar
Harrison, F.Ll.: Music in Medieval Britain (London, 1958)Google Scholar
Saltmarsh, J.: King's College (Norwich, 1956)Google Scholar
Sandon, N. (ed.): John Sheppard II: Masses, EECM, xviii (1976)Google Scholar
Sylvester, R.S. (ed.): The Life and Death of Cardinal Wolsey: George Cavendish, Early English Text Society (London, 1959)Google Scholar
John Taverner: Masses, TCM, i (1923)Google Scholar
TCM – Tudor Church Music (London) [see Taverner]Google Scholar
Warren, E. (ed.): Robert Fayrfax: Collected Works I, II, CMM, xvii/1–2 (1964)Google Scholar
Warren, E.: The Life and Works of Robert Fayrfax, Musicological Studies and Documents, xxii (American Institute of Musicology, Rome, 1969)Google Scholar
Wulstan, D.: ‘The Problem of Pitch in Sixteenth Century English Music’, Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association, 93 (1966–1967), p.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar