Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:05:06.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Valuation of a Recreational Activity: Clamming in Massachusetts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Richard W. Smith ,
Jon M. Conrad  and
David A. Storey
Richard W. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Jon M. Conrad
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
David A. Storey
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access

Extract

Economists have long wrestled with the problem of determining the value of nonmarket recreational activities. Knowing the value of a recreational activity could be helpful in at least three respects: (1) if the recreational activity is publicly provided, knowing the value which society places on that nonmarket activity would help in determining the appropriate level of public investment, (2) if a user charge for access to the recreational activity were necessary, a knowledge of the distribution of individual valuations would permit estimates of use (demand under alternative fees) and (3) to the extent that the resources involved in the recreational activity have other uses, knowledge of recreational values would help in determining the appropriate allocation of resources between the recreational activity and the other uses. Often the non-recreational activities already have dollar values established in markets; if the other uses are also nonmarket in nature, imputations of their dollar values would also be necessary.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , October 1976 , pp. 51 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This paper contains some preliminary results of a larger study examining the recreational values and management institutions of the Atlantic Coast clam resource in Massachusetts. The project was funded under the Hatch Act and the authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station and its Associate Director, Dr. John A. Naegele. The project is also part of Northeast Regional Study NE-91.

References

1. Brown, G. M. and Hammock, J., 1974, Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, for Resources for the Future, Inc.Google Scholar
2. Crutchfield, J. A., 1962, “Valuation of Fishery Resources,” Land Economics 38 (May): 145–54.Google Scholar
3. Crutchfield, J. A., and Pontecorvo, G., 1969, The Pacific Salmon Fisheries: A Study of Irrational Conservation, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
4. Currie, J. A., Murphy, J. A., and Schmitz, A., 1971, “The Concept of Economic Surplus and Its Use in Economic Analysis,” The Economic Journal 81 (Dec.): 741–99.Google Scholar
5. Jerome, W. C. Jr., Chesmore, A. P. and Anderson, C. O. Jr., 1968, A Study of the Marine Resources of the Parker River-Plum Island Sound Estuary, Mono., Ser. No. 2, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries.Google Scholar
6. Patinkin, D., 1963, “Demand Curves and Consumer's Surplus” in Measurement in Economics: Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics in Memory of Yehuda Grunfeld, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
7. Sinden, J. A., 1974, “A Utility Approach to the Valuation of Recreational and Aesthetic Experiences,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56 (Feb.): 61–72.Google Scholar
8. U. S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1976, Massachusetts Landings, December 1975, Washington, D.C., Current Fisheries Statistics No. 6948.Google Scholar