No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Study of Voter Attitudes Toward Different Proposals for the Use of an Undeveloped Island
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2017
Extract
Public concern with decisions about the use of land, particularly if it is undeveloped, is an increasing phenomenon in our society. This is especially true in the coastal zone, where land and water resources are extremely limited in quantity and subject to strong and growing demand, and where there are not only direct interrelationships among the ways adjacent parcels of shoreland and water are used, but also indirect interrelationships among various land and water uses that are effected through complex coastal ecosystems. Since the coastal waters are largely common property resources, there is a particularly strong rationale for concern about the impact of human activities upon their availability, quality, and viability within the ecosystem.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , April 1977 , pp. 81 - 92
- Copyright
- Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association
Footnotes
*
Paper No. 2119, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. This research supported (in part) from Experiment Station Project No. 329. The authors wish to thank Cleve Willis and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.
References
1. Allbee, Roger N. and Storey, David A., Elements in a Decision Framework for Planning the Allocation of Coastal Land and Water Resources With Illustration for a Coastal Community, Water Resources Research Center Publication No. 36, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 1973.Google Scholar
2. Devanney, J. W. III, Derbis, E., Seifert, W. and Wood, W., Economic Factors in the Development of a Coastal Zone, Report No. MITSG 71–1, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1970.Google Scholar
3. Freund, R. J., “On the Misuse of Significance Tests,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56 (1), February 1974, p. 192.Google Scholar
4. Freund, R. J., and Debertin, D. L., “Variable Selection and Statistical Significance: A Sampling Experiment,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57 (4), November 1975, pp. 721–722.Google Scholar
5. Ketchum, Bostwich H. (editor), The Water's Edge: Critical Problems of the Coastal Zone, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1972.Google Scholar
6. Klein, Lawrence R., An Introduction to Econometrics, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1962.Google Scholar
7. Lerner, Lionel, “Quantitative Indices of Recreational Value,” Water Resources and Economic Development of the West, Report No. 11, Proceedings, Conference of Committee on the Economics of Water Resources Development of Western Agricultural Economics Research Council, Reno: University of Nevada, 1962.Google Scholar
8. Rostron, John, “The Contribution of Attitude Studies to Outdoor Recreation Planning,” Resources, Recreation, and Research, Foster, Harold D. and Derrick Sewell, W. R. (editors), Western Geographical Series Vol. 3, Victoria, British Columbia: University of Victoria, 1970.Google Scholar
9. Willis, Cleve E. and Crawford, Charles O., “Methodological Issues in Analyses of Use and Adequacy of Community Services in Rural Areas: With an Application to Legal Services in the Northeast,” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, 5 (2), October 1976, pp. 29–39.Google Scholar