Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:52:20.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The SOIV Estimator: A Comparison With Alternative Estimators in a Model of the U.S. Apple Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Ronald R. Piggott
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
William G. Tomek
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Get access

Extract

Multicollinearity and a lack of degrees of freedom are problems in simultaneous systems, particularly in large models where the number of predetermined variables may exceed the number of observations. Such problems are somewhat less obvious in the small and medium-sized models typically estimated by agricultural economists. Thus, estimators designed to cope with the degrees of freedom (undersized sample) problem have received little attention in agricultural economics applications relative to macroeconometric uses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Aigner, D. J. Basic Econometrics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
2. Brandow, G. E. A Statistical Analysis of Apple Supply and Demand. Penn. State Univ., Agric. Econ. and Rur. Soc. No. 2., 1956.Google Scholar
3. Fisher, F. M.The Choice of Instrumental Variables in the Estimation of Economy-Wide Models”, Intern. Econ. Rev., 6 (1965): 245274.Google Scholar
4. Fisher, F. M. Simultaneous Equations Estimation: The State of the Art. Arlington, Virginia, Institute for Defense Analysis Economic Papers, July 1970.Google Scholar
5. Johnston, J. Econometric Methods. 2nd ed., New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1972.Google Scholar
6. Mitchell, B. M. and Fisher, F. M.The Choice of Instrumental Variables in the Estimation of Economy-Wide Econometric Models: Some Further Thoughts”, Intern. Econ. Rev., 11 (1970): 226234.Google Scholar
7. Pasour, E. C. and Gustafson, R. L. Intraseasonal Supply and Demand Functions for Apples. Michigan State Res. Bul. 10, 1966.Google Scholar
8. Piggott, R. R. An Econometric Model of the U.S. Apple Industry: Applications to Forecasting and Analyzing Policy Issues. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Jan. 1974. (Also see “Potential Gains from Controlling Distribution of the United States Apple Crop”, Search: Agriculture, Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Vol. 6, No. 2, 1976.)Google Scholar
9. Tomek, W. G. Apples in the U.S.: Farm Prices and Uses, 1947–75. Cornell Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 1022, July 1968.Google Scholar
10. Tomek, W. G. and Robinson, K. L. Agricultural Product Prices. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
11. Waugh, F. V. Demand and Analysis, Price. USDA Tech. Bul. 1316, Nov. 1964.Google Scholar