Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:46:37.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recreational Homes: Town Characteristics and Variations in Concentrations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Pamela H. Pataky
Affiliation:
Institute of Natural and Environmental Resources, University of New Hampshire
Edmund F. Jansen Jr.
Affiliation:
Institute of Natural and Environmental Resources, University of New Hampshire
Get access

Extract

Recreational home development has been and is likely to continue to be a major concern of many local governments in New England and elsewhere. Recreational homes are defined here as homes that are not the owner's primary residence and are used for vacation, leisure, or recreation. It is generally agreed that this type of development is initially beneficial to local government finances. While more town services may be required, the cost is usually outweighed by the added tax revenue. It is believed, however, that over time recreational homes may be converted to primary homes, which could lead to cost increases without proportional increases in revenue (Am. Soc. of Planning Officials, Clark, Payne). Also, from a wider perspective, the loss of agricultural and forest land to this use may not be desirable.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Society of Planning Officials. Subdividing Rural America. Council on Environmental Quality, Washington: Govt. Printing Office, 1976.Google Scholar
Burby, Raymond J. III. Household Decision Processes in the Purchase and Use of Reservoir Recreation Land. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute, March 1971.Google Scholar
Clark, Edwin H.The Rural Suburb: A Socio-Economic Overview.” in Man, Leisure, and Wildlands: A Complex Interaction, Fort Collins, CO: Eisenhower Consortium for Western Environmental Forestry Research, 1975.Google Scholar
Ellison, Daniel, Principal Planner. Recreation and Resources Planning Office, N.H. Department of Resources and Economic Development, as reported to Edmund F. Jansen, Jr., March 16, 1979.Google Scholar
Marans, Robert W., Wellman, John D., Newman, Sandra J., and Kruse, John A. Waterfront Living: A Report on Permanent and Seasonal Residents in Northern Michigan. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, Fall 1976.Google Scholar
New Hampshire Atlas and Gazetter. Yarmouth, ME: David DeLorme and Company, 1977.Google Scholar
N.H. Division of Economic Development. Official New Hampshire Tourist Map 1970–71. Concord, NH, 1970.Google Scholar
N.H. State Planning and Development Commission. Population and Area of Cities, Towns, and Counties in New Hampshire 1960. Concord, NH, 1960.Google Scholar
N.H. State Planning Project. Land-Water Recreation Report No. 4, New Hampshire Water Bodies and Public Access Points. Concord, NH, Aug. 1964.Google Scholar
Payne, Brian R., Gannon, Richard C. and Irland, Lloyd C. The Second Home, Recreation Market in the Northeast. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, 1976.Google Scholar
Ragatz, Richard L.The Vacation Home Market.” Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, 1969.Google Scholar
Tombaugh, Larry W.Factors Influencing Vacation Home Location.” Journal of Leisure Research, 2 (1970): 5463.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Second Count Summary Tapes from the 1970 Census of Population and Housing. Series CT-3, DAD No. 8, New Hampshire. n.d.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Outdoor Recreation: Northern New England Vacation Home Study – 1966. Washington, 1966.Google Scholar