Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:50:22.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Municipal Bond Ratings: Are They Worthwhile for Rural Governments?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Patrick J. Sullivan
Patrick J. Sullivan*
Affiliation:
Economic Development Division, Economic Research Service, USDA
Get access

Abstract

Rural governments in the Northeast purchased credit ratinqs for a high percentage of their general obligation bonds sold in 1977. This paper examines the effect credit ratings had on the interest cost of GO bonds sold by nonmetro governments in the Northeast. The results suggest that the decision to purchase a rating may be a costly error under certain circumstances.

Type
Symposia
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Spring 1982 , pp. 67 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author wishes to thank Eleanor Whitehead for her assistance with the analysis.

References

Bahl, Roy W. “Measuring the Creditworthiness of State and Local Governments: Municipal Bond Ratings,” Proceedings of the Sixty-Fourth Annual Conference on Taxation. Columbus, Ohio: National Tax Association, 1971, pp. 600–22.Google Scholar
Carleton, Willard T. and Lerner, Eugene M. “Statistical Credit Scoring of Municipal Bonds,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1 (November 1969), pp. 750–764.Google Scholar
Forbes, Ronald W. and Frankle, Alan W. “Tax-Exempt Revenue Bonds: Are Ratings a Proxy for Credit Quality?” Review of Business and Economic Research, 14 (Winter 1979), pp. 68–77.Google Scholar
Gamello, Thomas P. and Streets, Stephen W. “Dramatic Increases in Bond Marketing Costs Noted for Counsel, Rating Services and Printing,” The Weekly Bond Buyer: MFOA Supplement No. 1, Monday, May 12, 1980, p. 6Google Scholar
Hendershott, Patric H., and Kidwell, David S. “The Impact of Relative Security Supplies: A Test with Data from a Regional Tax-Exempt Bond Market,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 10 (1978), 337–347.Google Scholar
Horton, Joseph. “Statistical Classification of Municipal Bonds.” Journal of Bank Research, 1 (Autumn 1970), pp. 29–40.Google Scholar
Jantscher, Gerald R. “The Effects of Changes in Credit Ratings on Municipal Borrowing Costs.” Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1970.Google Scholar
Kaufman, George G. “Does It Pay for Oregon Communities to Obtain a Credit Rating for Their Bonds?” Eugene, Oregon: Center for Capital Market Research, University of Oregon, 1974.Google Scholar
Kessel, Reuben. “A Study of the Effects of Competition in the Tax-Exempt Bond Market,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 79 (1971), 706–738.Google Scholar
Peterson, John. The Rating Game. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund, 1974.Google Scholar
Rubinfeld, Daniel L. “Credit Ratings and the Market for General Obligation Municipal Bonds,” National Tax Journal, 26 (March 1973), pp. 17–27.Google Scholar
Salomon Brothers. 1977 Annual Review of the Pond Market. 1978.Google Scholar
Schneeweis, Thomas. “Bond Ratings As a Measure of Market Risk,” National Tax Association, Proceedings of the 70th Annual Conference on Taxation, 1977 pp 334–339.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Hugh C. How Corporate and Municipal Debt is Rated: An Inside Look at Standard & Poor's Rating System. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, Wade S. The Appraisal of Municipal Credit Risk. New York: Moody's Investors Service, Inc., 1979.Google Scholar