Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:35:50.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modelling the Residential Demand for Electricity in New England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Trevor Young
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Thomas H. Stevens
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access

Abstract

Accurate forecasts of energy demand are required for public policy formation, but estimation of the residential demand for electricity presents a number of conceptual and statistical problems. This paper focuses on two interrelated issues in electricity demand analysis: model specification with respect to the price variable and the level of data aggregation. From an empirical study of demand in New England, our principal conclusions are: (a) price elasticities, estimated using state level data, differ from those at the utility level; (b) at the state level of aggregation, alternative model specifications of demand give markedly different results; (c) there appears to be significant differences between the New England states in the demand for electricity; and (d) it was not possible to discern whether consumers respond to average price or marginal price.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Billings, R. B. and Agthe, D. E. 1980. “Price Elasticities for Water: The Case of Increasing Block Rates.” Land Economics. 56 (February): 7384.Google Scholar
Cramer, J. S. 1964. “Efficient Grouping, Regression and Correlation in Engel Curve Analysis.” Journal of American Statistical Association. 59: 233250.Google Scholar
Grunfeld, Y. and Griliches, Z. 1960. “Is Aggregation Necessarily Bad?Review of Economics and Statistics. 42: 113.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, R. 1978. Econometric Models of U.S. Energy Demand. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, R. and Palmquist, R. 1980. “The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations.” American Economic Review. 70: 474475.Google Scholar
Hoerl, A. and Kennard, R. 1970. “Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems.” Technometrics. 12: 5567.Google Scholar
Houthakker, H. S. 1962. “Electricity Tariffs in Theory and Practice.” Electricity in the United States. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.Google Scholar
Mount, T. D., Chapman, L. D., and Tyrrell, T. J. 1973. Electricity Demand in the United States: An Econometric Analysis. Oak Ridge: Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
National Laboratory (ORNL/NSF-49). Nordin, J. A. 1976. “A Proposed Modification of Taylor's Demand Analysis: Comment.” Bell Journal of Economics. 7 (Autumn): 719721.Google Scholar
Opaluch, J. J. 1982. “Urban Residential Demand for Water in the United States: Further Discussion.” Land Economics. 58 (2): 225–221.Google Scholar
Orcutt, G. H., Watts, H. W. and Edwards, J. B. 1968. “Data Aggregation and Information Loss.” American Economic Review. 773787.Google Scholar
Smith, V. K. 1980. “Estimating the Price Elasticity of U.S. Electricity Demand.” Energy Economics. (April)8185.Google Scholar
Smith, V. K. and Cicchetti, C. J. 1975. “Measuring the Price Elasticity of Demand for Electricity: The U.S. Experience.” In Energy Systems: Planning, Forecasting and Pricing, ed. by Cicchetti, C. J. and Foell, W. K. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. D. 1975. “The Demand for Electricity: A SurveyBell Journal of Economics. 6 (Spring): 74110.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. T., et al. 1977. The Residential Demand for Energy. Electric Power Research Institute. (EPRI EA-235).Google Scholar
Wallace, T. D. and Toro-Vizcarrondo, C. E. 1969. “Tables for the Mean Square Error Test for Exact Linear Restrictions in Regression.” Journal of American Statistical Association. 64: 16491663.Google Scholar