Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:28:36.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Land Use Projections Under Alternative Policies: A Transition Matrix Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Bruce E. Lindsay
Affiliation:
Resource Economics, University of New Hampshire
Daniel L. Dunn
Affiliation:
Institute of Natural and Environmental Resources, University of New Hampshire
Get access

Extract

As a result of accelerated growth during the past decade, land use change over time and its accompanying problems represents a policy area germane to New Hampshire. Accurate projections of the future pattern of land use would be helpful to decision makers responsible for land use policy. Such projections could assist policy makers either directly in formulating land use plans or indirectly in justifying the need (or lack of need) for overt land use planning. Future projections, based upon various alternative land use policy scenarios, will increase the quantitative supply of information to decision makers in a two-fold manner. First, such estimates provide an insight into the current trend in land use mix and, secondly, give an overview of what impacts various policies directly have upon land use change.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper relates to research funded under NE-125 entitled, “Socioeconomic Factors and Rural Land Use.” New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station Scientific Contribution No. 980.

References

Burnham, Bruce O.Markov Intertemporal Land Use Simulation Model.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics. 5 (1973): 253258.Google Scholar
Coppelman, G.G.; Pilgrim, S. and Peschel, D. Agriculture, Forest and Related Land Use in New Hampshire, 1952 to 1975. New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report No. 64, April, 1978.Google Scholar
Halberg, M.C.Projecting the Size Distribution of Agricultural Firms – An Application of Markov Process with Non-Stationary Transition Probabilities.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 51 (1969): 289302.Google Scholar
New Hampshire Statute, RSA 79-A:1 to 26, 1973 amended 1974.Google Scholar