Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:43:06.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Introduction of Administration and Research Activities into Regional Input-Output Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Sharon M. Brucker  and
Steven E. Hastings
Sharon M. Brucker
Affiliation:
The Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, University of Delaware
Steven E. Hastings
Affiliation:
The Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, University of Delaware
Get access

Abstract

Input-output analysis has been used extensively to identify the interrelationships in local, state, regional and national economies. One type of economic activity that is prevalent in several states in the Northeast has not typically been included in regional input-output models: that carried on at administrative offices and auxiliary establishments.

This paper appraises the need for a sector representing administration and auxiliary activities in regional I-O models in the Northeast and provides a method for estimating a direct requirements column for such a sector from secondary data. The method proposed is used to estimate the direct requirements column for this sector in an input-output model for Delaware. The importance of including administration and auxiliary activities in an input-output model used for impact analysis is demonstrated.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Spring 1983 , pp. 83 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors wish to express appreciation to Richard N. Boisvert for supplying the computer program for a non-survey input-output technique. Published with the approval of the Director of the Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station as Miscellaneous Paper No. 985.

References

Bahn, Henry M. and Hardie, Ian W. Industrial Contributions to the Economy of the Southern Delmarva Peninsula, 1972. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, March 1977.Google Scholar
Bills, Nelson L. and Barr, Alfred L. An Input Output Analysis of the Upper South Branch Valley of West Virginia. Bulletin 568T, West Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, June 1968.Google Scholar
Boisvert, Richard N. and Bills, Nelson L. “A Non-Survey Technique for Regional I-O Models: Application to River Basin Planning.” Agriculture Experiment R. 76–19, August 1976.Google Scholar
Brucker, Sharon M. and Cole, Gerald L. “An Input-Output Study of Sussex County, Delaware,” Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 428, July 1979.Google Scholar
Brucker, Sharon M. and Hastings, Steven E. “An Interindustry Model of the State of Delaware,” Preliminary Draft, 1982.Google Scholar
Gamble, H. B. The Economic Structure of Sullivan County, Pennsylvania. University Park, PA: Agricultural Experiment Station, Pennsylvania State University, June 1967.Google Scholar
Gamble, H. B. and Raphail, D. L. A Microregional Analysis of Clinton County, vol. 2. University Park, PA; Pennsylvania State University. Regional Analysis Group, Pennsylvania State University, June 1966.Google Scholar
Grigalunas, Thomas A. and Ascari, Craig A. “Estimation of Income and Employment Multipliers for Marine-Related Activity in the Southern New England Marine Region.” Journal of the Northeast Agricultural Council, Vol. 11, No. 1, Spring, 1982.Google Scholar
Hiser, Michel L. and Fisher, Denis U. An Interindustry Analysis of Clinton County New York. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Agricultural Experiment Station, July 1977.Google Scholar
Schaffer, W. A. and Chu, K. “Nonsurvey Techniques for Constructing Regional Interindustry Models,” Papers, Regional Science Association, 23 (1969) 83–101.Google Scholar
Stevens, Benjamin H., Ehrlich, David J., Kindahl, James K. and Treyz, George I. “Basic Regional Input-Output for Transportation Impact Analysis: Handbook One,” Regional Science Research Institute, Amherst, MA. Revised Draft, March 1981.Google Scholar
Stevens, Benjamin H., Treyz, George I. and Ehrlich, David J. “On the Estimation of Regional Purchase Coefficients, Export Employment and Elasticities of Response for Regional Economic Models,” discussion paper 114, Regional Science Institute, January 1980.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Census of Manufacturers, 1977, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1978.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, County Business Patterns, 1977, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1978.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1977 Enterprise Statistics, Central Administrative Offices and Auxiliaries, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, May 1981.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. Detailed Input-Output Structure of the U.S. Economy: 1972, Vol. 1, Washington, DC: 1979.Google Scholar