Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:47:32.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics of Compensation in Development Rights Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Barry C. Field  and
Jon M. Conrad
Barry C. Field
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Jon M. Conrad
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access

Extract

Interest in land-use planning and control in the United States has recently shifted to a variety of non-conventional tools in an attempt to attain results that have eluded older techniques such as traditional zoning. A major land-use objective has been to continue certain existing land uses in the face of market pressures to convert to more intensive uses. This has been the case, for example, with ecologically fragile areas such as wetlands, or environmentally valuable areas such as scenic land, which are also economically attractive for development into housing or industrial property. In recent years interest has also turned to preservation of agricultural land, particularly in areas near urban concentrations that are feeling the effects of urban sprawl.

Type
Resource and Environmental Economics
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , October 1975 , pp. 185 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bosselman, Fred, Callies, David and Banta, John, The Taking Issue, Council for Environmental Quality, Washington, D.C., 1973, p. 302.Google Scholar
2 Robert Burley Associates for Vermont State Planning Office, People on the Land, Settlement Patterns for Vermont, Waitsfield, Vermont, June, 1973.Google Scholar
3 Chavooshian, B. B. and Norman, T., “Transfer of Development Rights: A New Concept in Land Use Management,” Cooperative Extension Service, Rutgers University, Leaflet 492, n.d.Google Scholar
4 Costonis, J. J., Space Adrift, Landmark Preservation and the Market-place, Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1974.Google Scholar
5 Costonis, J. J., “Development Rights Transfer: An Exploratory Essay,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 83, 1973, pp. 75–128.Google Scholar
6 Derr, D. A., Norman, T. and Schneider, L. D., “Transfer of Development Rights - Its Problems and Potential as a Land-Use Control Technique,” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, October, 1973, pp. 185–197.Google Scholar
7 Marcus, N., “Air Rights Transfers in New York City,” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 36, 1971, pp. 372ff.Google Scholar
8 Maryland Senate, A Bill to Promote the Conservation of Open Space Through the Creation of Conservation Districts, Bill No. 792, Senator W. V. Goodman, March 15, 1971.Google Scholar
9 Michelman, F. I., “Property, Utility and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of ‘Just Compensation’ Law,” Harvard Law Review, April, 1967, pp. 1165–1258.Google Scholar
10 Plus Publications, “Land Use Planning Reports,” Washington, D.C., April, 1974.Google Scholar
11 Sax, J. L., “Takings, Private Property and Public Rights,” Yale Law Journal, December 1971, pp. 149–186.Google Scholar
12 Turvey, R., “Development Charges and the Compensation - Betterment Problem,” Economic Journal, Vol. 63, June, 1953, pp. 299–317.Google Scholar
13 Woodbury, S. R., “Transfer of Development Rights,” University of Pennsylvania, City and Regional Planning, May, 1974.Google Scholar
14 Woodbury, S. R., “Transfer of Development Rights: A New Tool for Planners,” AIP Journal, January, 1975, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar