Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:52:30.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Costs of Altering the Quality of Water in Cayuga Lake by Reducing Phosphorus Losses from a Rural Watershed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

George L. Casler  and
James J. Jacobs
George L. Casler
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University
James J. Jacobs
Affiliation:
USDA, ERS, Cornell University
Get access

Extract

The objective of this paper is to compare alternative ways of reducing the input of biologically available phosphorus to Cayuga Lake from the Fall Creek watershed. This watershed covers 125 square miles, contains 130 dairy farms, has a population of 12,000, and is one of the major tributaries of the lake. Comparisons are made on the basis of the cost per pound of biologically available phosphorus prevented from entering the lake. Four sources of phosphorus, three of them farm-related, are considered: (1) land runoff as related to soil erosion; (2) land runoff as related to manure applications; (3) barnyard runoff; and (4) municipal sewage.

Type
Resource and Environmental Economics
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , October 1975 , pp. 174 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bouldin, D. R., 1975. Sources and stream transport of phosphorus and nitrogen, Chapter in Nitrogen and phosphorus: food production, wastes, and the environment, forthcoming.Google Scholar
2 Casier, G. L., and Jacobs, J. J., 1975. Economic analysis of reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural production, Chapter in Nitrogen and phosphorus: food production, wastes, and the environment, forthcoming.Google Scholar
3 Jacobs, James J. and Casier, G. L., 1972. Economic and environmental considerations in dairy manure management systems. A. E. Res. 72–18. Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y.Google Scholar
4 Keup, Lowell E., 1968. Phosphorus in flowing waters, Water Research 2, No. 5: 373–386.Google Scholar
5 Klausner, S. D. and Zwerman, P. J., 1974. Water quality as influenced by the management of land applied dairy manure. Agronomy Mimeo 74-32. Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, N. Y.Google Scholar
6 Kumar, Inder Jit and Clesceri, Nicholas L., 1973. Phosphorus removal from waste-waters: a cost analysis. Water and Sewage Works. Pp. 82–91.Google Scholar
7 Minshall, Neal E., Witzel, Stanley A., and Nichols, Merle S., 1970. Stream enrichment from farm operations. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division: Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Pp. 513–524.Google Scholar
8 Oglesby, R. T., 1974. Liminological guidelines for Finger Lakes Management, Technical Report 89, Cornell Water Resources and Marine Science Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y.Google Scholar
9 Oglesby, R. T., 1975. The response of lakes to phosphorus, Chapter in Nitrogen and phosphorus: food production, wastes, and the environment, forthcoming.Google Scholar
10 Stanford, G., England, C. B. and Taylor, A. W., 1970. Fertilizer use and water quality. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, 41–168.Google Scholar
11 United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1973. Methods for identifying and evaluating the nature and extent of nonpoint sources of pollutants. EPA-430/9-73-014.Google Scholar
12 Vallentyne, J. R., 1974. The algal bowl: lakes and man, Misc. Spec. Publ. 22, Fisheries Research Board of Canada.Google Scholar
13 Wischmeier, Walter H., and Smith, Dwight D., 1965. Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains: guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation. Agricultural Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture in cooperation with Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station. Agriculture Handbook No. 282.Google Scholar