Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:14:12.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controlling Sediment and Nutrient Losses from Agricultural Lands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2020

James J. Jacobs
James J. Jacobs*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics Department, Cornell University
Get access

Extract

Quality of the environment is measured and evaluated by some criteria, such as composition, and by performance. However, quality, in terms of composition and/or performance, as a factor in environment has no meaning except as it relates to some use of the environment and scale of health, happiness and aspirations of man. For example, an environment is regarded as having a lower quality than 15 years ago because of an increase in the phosphorus contained in surface water and/or a change in the species of fish present in surface waters. In terms of performance, a particular environment (watershed) is not producing enough because the soil and phosphorus losses are twice the acceptable rate. Furthermore, the composition and performance of an environment are related. Measurement of the nitrogen and phosphorus content of water helps to determine if a given water resource can be used (perform) in a particular way.

Type
Agricultural Production and Land Use
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 1 , October 1972 , pp. 94 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gratto, Charles P. Issues in Environmental Quality, A Primer on Agricultural Pollution, Reprint from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 26: 44–45, 1971.Google Scholar
2 McKee, J. R. and Wolf, Harold, Editors. Water Quality Criteria, 2nd Edition, California State Water Quality Control Board Pub. No. 3-A, 1963.Google Scholar
3 Timmons, John F. Economics of Pollution Control, Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, Paper No. J-6876: 77-85, March 1971.Google Scholar
4 Seay, Edmond Eggleston Jr. Minimizing Abatement Costs of Water Pollutants from Agriculture: A Parametric Linear Programming Approach, , Ames, Iowa, Library, Iowa State University, 1970.Google Scholar
5 Aldrich, S. R.; Oschwald, W. R. and Fehrenbacher, J. B. Implications of Crop-Production Technology for Environmental Quality, AAAS Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, December 1970.Google Scholar
6 Duley, F. L. The Loss of Soluble Salts in Runoff Water, Soil Science 21: 401–409, 1926.Google Scholar
7 Weidner, R. B.; Christianson, A. G.; Weibel, S. R. and Robeck, G. G. Rural Runoff as a Factor in Stream Pollution, Water Pollution Control Federation Journal 41: 377–384, March 1969.Google Scholar
8 Timmons, D. R.; Burwell, R. E. and Holt, R. F. Loss of Crop Nutrients Through Runoff, Minnesota Science 24, No. 4: 16–18, 1968.Google Scholar
9 Miller, R. J. and Boggess, W. R. A Two-Dimensional Approach to Environmental Research, Illinois Research 13, No. 2: 9–10, 1971.Google Scholar
10 Edwards, William E. and Harrold, Lloyd L. Agricultural Pollution of Water Bodies, The Ohio Journal of Science 70, No. 1: 50–56, 1970.Google Scholar
11 Casier, George L. Measurement of the Contribution of Agricultural Production and Processing to Environmental Pollution, Staff Paper No. 39, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, July 1971.Google Scholar
12 Jacobs, James J. Economics of Water Quality Management: Exemplified by Specified Pollutants in Agricultural Runoff, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Ames, Iowa, Library, Iowa State University, 1972.Google Scholar
13 Holt, R. F.; Dowby, R. H. and Timmons, D. R. Chemistry of Sediment in Water, In Willrich, Ted L. and Smith, George E., Editors, Agricultural Practices and Water Quality, pp, 21–34, Ames, Iowa, Iowa State University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
14 Nicholson, H. Page. Occurrence and Significance of Pesticide Residues in Water, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 59: 4–5, 1969.Google Scholar
15 Wischmeier, W. H. and Smith, D. D. Predicting Rainfall-Erosion Losses from Cropland East of the Rocky Mountains, U. S. Department Agricultural Handbook 282, 1965.Google Scholar
16 Thomas, A. W.; Carter, R. L. and Carreker, J. R. Soil Water and Nutrient Losses from Tifton Loamy Sand, ASAE Transactions 11, No. 5: 677–679, 1968.Google Scholar
17 Black, C. A. Behavior of Soil and Fertilizer Phosphorus in Relation to Water Pollution, In Willrich, T. L. and Smith, G. E., Agricultural Practices and Water Quality, pp. 72–93, Ames, Iowa, Iowa State University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
18 Massey, H. F.; Jackson, M. L. and Hays, O. E. Fertility Erosion on Two Wisconsin Soils, Agronomy Journal 45: 543–547, 1953.Google Scholar
19 Frankel, Richard Joel. Water Quality Management: An Engineering-Economic Model for Domestic Waste Disposal, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Berkeley, California, Library, University of California, 1965.Google Scholar
20 Kneese, Allen V. and Bower, Blair T. Managing Water Quality: Economics, Technology, Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, The Johns Hopkins Press, 1968.Google Scholar