Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:41:18.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Approaches to Rural Recreation Planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Frederic O. Sargent
Frederic O. Sargent*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Vermont
Get access

Extract

Outdoor recreation concepts, programs, and planning have developed at a fast rate during the last decade. However, most criteria, standards, and guidelines for recreation planning have been developed for urban areas and have limited relevance to planning in rural areas. It has become evident that rural towns have different needs, requirements, and opportunities, and require distinctly different standards and concepts than urban areas. The goals of rural people, the types of recreation needed and resources available, the financial situation, the leadership, and the land suitabilities all conspire against use of urban standards and indicate the need for procedures and standards designed for rural areas (2).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 1976 , pp. 27 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brown, Tommy L., and Wilkins, Bruce T. “Methods of Improving Recreation Projections,” Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 225–234, 1975.Google Scholar
2. Grofts, Edward C., Director, “Outdoor Recreation Space Standards,” Department of Interior, Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, 1967.Google Scholar
3. Knetsch, Jack L., “Assessing the Demand for Outdoor Recreation,” Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 85–87, 1969.Google Scholar
4. McKechnie, George E., “The Psychological Structure of Leisure Past Behavior,” Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 27–45, 1974.Google Scholar
5. Newlinger, John, and Breit, Miranda, “Attitude Dimensions of Leisure,” Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 255–261, 1969.Google Scholar
6. Outdoor Recreation Trends, Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, USDI, p. 15, 1967.Google Scholar
7. Parks for America, A Survey of Park and Related Resources in the 50 States, and a Preliminary Plan, USDI, National Parks Service, 1964, p. 479.Google Scholar
8. Ritchie, J. R. Brent, “On the Derivation of Leisure Activity Types—A Perceptual Mapping Approach,” Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 128–140, 1975.Google Scholar
9. Sargent, Frederic O., “Hiking on Camels Hump,” Vermont Agr. Exp. Sta., 1969.Google Scholar
10. Sargent, Frederic O., “Motives for Outdoor Recreation,” Journal of Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 217–224, 1972.Google Scholar
11. Sargent, Frederic O., “Recreation Potential of Vermont,” Vermont Resources Research Center Report No. 16, 1966.Google Scholar
12. Sargent, F. O., “Scenery Classification,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1966.Google Scholar
13. “Thesaurus of Outdoor Recreation Terms, Department of Recreation and Parks,” Texas A&M University and Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, 1970.Google Scholar