Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:20:38.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Land Use Conflicts in the Coastal Zone: An Approach for the Analysis of the Opportunity Costs of Protecting Coastal Resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Steven F. Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island
Glen D. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island
Get access

Abstract

The implicit price (hedonic) equation for the housing market in a coastal town in southern Rhode Island was estimated using a conditional Box-Cox maximum likelihood procedure. Linear, log-linear, and semi-log functional forms were rejected with 95% confidence. Estimates of marginal implicit prices for water related attributes (view of, frontage on, and proximity to a coastal salt water pond) derived from these rejected models were quite different from those determined from the optimal functional form. This result has important ramifications for public policy, as is shown in an example, since these attributes were found to be highly valued in the housing market.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Research was partially supported by Sea Grant and the Rhode Island Experiment Station.

References

Anderson, R. J., and Crocker, T.Air Pollution and Residential Property Values.” Urban Studies 8(1971): 171180.Google Scholar
Brookshire, D. S., Thayer, M. A., Schulze, W. D. and D’Agre, R. C.Valuing Public Goods: A Comparison of Survey and Hedonic Approaches.” Amer. Econ. Review 72(1982): 165177.Google Scholar
Brown, G. M. Jr., and Pollakowski, H. O.Economic Valuation of Shoreline.” Rev. Econ. Stat. 59(1977): 272278.Google Scholar
Butler, R. V.The Specification of Hedonic Indexes for Urban Housing.” Land Economics 58(1982): 96108.Google Scholar
David, E.Lakeshore Property Values: A Guide to Public Investment in Recreation.” Water Resources Res. 4(1968): 697707.Google Scholar
Freeman, A.M. III. “Hedonic Prices, Property Values and Measuring Environmental Benefits: A Survey of the Issues. Scand. J. Econ. 81 (1979): 154173.Google Scholar
Goodman, S. A.Measuring the Value of Housing Quality.” J. Regional Science 17(1977): 107115.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, R., and Pollakowski, H. O.Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Equations.” J. Urban Econ. 19(1981): 3749.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. Jr., and Rubinfeld, D. L.Hedonic Housing Prices and the Demand for Clean Air.” J. Envir. Econ. Management 5(1978): 81102.Google Scholar
Li, M. M., and Brown, H. J.Micro-neighborhood Externalities and Hedonic Housing Prices.” Land Economics 56(1980): 125141.Google Scholar
Linneman, P.Some Empirical Results on the Nature of the Hedonic Price Function for the Urban Housing Market.” J. Urban Econ. 8(1980): 4768.Google Scholar
Olsen, S., Lee, V., and Collins, C. Recommended Measures to Maintain and Protect the Qualities of Charlestown's Salt Pond Region. RI Coastal Resources Center, Univ. of Rhode Island, 1982a.Google Scholar
Olsen, S., Lee, V., and Collins, C. Recommended Measures to Maintain and Protect the Qualities of South Kingstown's Salt Pond Region. RI Coastal Resources Center, Univ. of Rhode Island, 1982b.Google Scholar
Ridker, R. G., and Henning, J. A.The Determinants of Residential Property Value with Special Reference to Air Pollution.” Rev. Econ. Stat. 49(1967): 246257.Google Scholar
Rosen, S.Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” J. Political Econ. 81(1974): 3455.Google Scholar
Shabman, L., and Bertelson, M. K.The Use of Development Value Estimates for Coastal Wetland Permit Decisions.” Land Economics 55(1979): 213222.Google Scholar
Willis, C. E., and Foster, J. H.The hedonic approach: No panacea for valuing water quality changes.” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, XII (1983): 5357, June 23, 1982, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar