Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:52:29.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact on Livestock Producers of U.S. Policies Affecting Feed Supplies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Allen M. Prindle
Allen M. Prindle*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland
Get access

Extract

U.S. agricultural policy has been implemented by various means including price supports, production or acreage controls, trade agreements, commodity reserves, food aid, and other programs (Brandow, 1976). These have been advanced to respond to various public policy objectives. Most of these policies have been directed toward food and feed grains, resulting in varying impacts on producers and consumers of these grains.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , October 1979 , pp. 289 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is based on research conducted at the Pennsylvania State University, while the author was a graduate research assistant. Scientific Article No. A2629, Contribution No. 5667 of the Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Arzac, Enrique R. and Wilkenson, Maurice. “A Quarterly Econometric Model of the United States Livestock and Feed Grain Markets and Some of Its Policy Implications.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61 (1979):297–308.Google Scholar
Brandow, George E. Interrelationships Among Demand for Farm Products and Implications for Control of Market Supply. Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 680, 1961.Google Scholar
Brandow, George E., “An Evaluation of Policy Instruments,” Paper presented to the 1976 National Public Policy Education Conference, Zion, Illinois.Google Scholar
Breimyer, Harold F. and Rhodes, James. “Livestock Aspects of Feed Grain Policy.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 57, No. 5 57 (1975) 945–948.Google Scholar
Egbert, Alvin C. and Ruetlinger, S. “A Dynamic Long-Run Model of the Livestock Feed Sector.” Journal of Farm Economics, 47 (1965): 1288–1305.Google Scholar
Evans, M.K. “An Agricultural Submodel for the U.S. Economy.” Essay in Industrial Economics, Vol. II, Klein, L.K. (editor), Philadelphia: Wharton School of Finance and Commerce, 1969.Google Scholar
Hallberg, M.C. and Fallert, R.S. Policy Simulation Model for the United States Dairy Industry. Bulletin No. 805, Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station, January, 1976.Google Scholar
King, Gordon A. “Econometric Models of the Agricultural Sector.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57 (1975): 164–171.Google Scholar
Martin, Larry and Meilke, Karl D. “Implications of International Trade on Resources for Animal Production.” Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Houston, Texas, January, 1979.Google Scholar
Meilke, Karl D. “An Aggregate U.S. Feed Grain Model.” Agricultural Economics Research, 27 (1975): 9–18.Google Scholar
Prindle, Allen M. A Static Equilibrium Model of the U.S. Feed-Livestock Sector. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, 1977.Google Scholar
Reiger, Donald W. Livestock and Derived Feed Demand in the World GOL Model. USDA-ESCS, Foreign Agricultural Economic Report No. 152, September, 1978.Google Scholar
Rojko, A., Regier, D., O'Brien, P., Coffing, A. and Bailey, L. Alternative Futures for World Food in 1985: The World GOL Model, USDA-ESCSGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics, 1977.Google Scholar