Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:09:35.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of the Base-Excess Plan for Leveling Seasonal Milk Production: Case Example of Maryland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Allen M. Prindle
Allen M. Prindle*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland. Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station Contribution Number
Get access

Abstract

Seasonal incentive plans, such as the base-excess plan, have been initiated to encourage producers to shift their production to be more similar to seasonal consumption patterns. The effectiveness of the seasonal incentive plan was evaluated by examining Maryland milk production data for the period 1966–78. The analysis indicated that month-to-month variation in milk production has increased in recent years, and suggests that current seasonal incentive plans be evaluated to encourage dairy producers to shift their production schedules.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1980 , pp. 47 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babb, E. M., Bessler, D. A. and Pheasant, J. W. Analysis of Over-Order Payments in Federal Milk Marketing Orders. Indiana Agricultural Experiment Station Bul. No. 235, August 1979.Google Scholar
Christensen, R. A., Petterson, D. E., and Swainston, A. H. The Function and Cost of Market Milk Reserves and Balancing Supply with Demand. Utah State University, Economics Research Institute Study Paper 79–8, September 1979.Google Scholar
Dobson, W. D. and Salathe, Larry E. “The Effects of Federal Milk Orders on the Economic Performance of the U.S. Milk Markets.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 61 (1979): 213–227.Google Scholar
Lasley, F. A. and Sleight, L. G. Balancing Supply with Demand for Fluid Milk Markets—A Cost Comparison. USDA-ESCS Staff Report, October 1979.Google Scholar
Maryland Department of Agriculture, Maryland Agricultural Statistics, June 1979, and earlier issues.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. N. and Levine, S. G. Government's Role in Pricing Fluid Milk in the United States. USDA-ESCS, Agricultural Economic Report No. 397, March 1979.Google Scholar
Smith, B. J., Metzger, H. B., and Lasley, F. A. Fluid Milk Reserves and Production-Consumption Balances in Northeastern United States. Bul. 819, Penn State University Agricultural Experiment Station, May 1978.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Marketing Service. “Federal Milk Marketing Order No. 4.” Reprinted from Federal Register of April 30, 1975 (effective June 1, 1975).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Compilation of Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, with Amendments as of January 20, 1971. CMS Agricultural Handbook 421, October 1971.Google Scholar