Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:35:02.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cost of Education – A Synthetic Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Ronald A. Sadler ,
John V. Martin  and
C.T.K. Ching
Ronald A. Sadler
Affiliation:
Statistical Reporting Service, Salt Lake City, Utah
John V. Martin
Affiliation:
Statistical Reporting Service, Madison, Wisconsin
C.T.K. Ching
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Nevada, Reno
Get access

Extract

There is perennial interest in the quality of education relative to its cost. For example, several Supreme Courts have ruled that funding education on the basis of a real property tax is unconstitutional because it makes the quality of a child's education dependent upon the wealth of his parents and neighbors. California, Michigan, Texas, and other states have focused on this problem, though the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Texas decision (Rodriquez et. al. vs. San Antonio). These cases illustrate continuing interest in educational quality and cost. At the school level, the relation between quality and cost is also well known. Most, if not all, school administrators continually face the problem of providing education with rapidly increasing costs. In Nevada, for example, education costs have been increasing at a rate of 13.5 percent per year.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 1976 , pp. 87 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Contribution of the Nevada Agricultural Experiment Station, Journal Series No. 325.

References

1. Black, Guy, “Synthetic Method of Cost Analysis in Agricultural Marketing Firms,” Journal of Farm Economics, Vol 37, No. 2, May 1955.Google Scholar
2. Johnson, J., “Statistical Cost Functions: A Re-appraisal,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 40, No. 4, November 1958.Google Scholar
3. Lesher, William G. and Mapp, Harry P., “Economics of Size in Highway Maintenance and Administration: A Preliminary Analysis for the Counties of New York State,” Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Vol. 3, No. 1, May 1974.Google Scholar
4. Osborne, Donald D., “Economies of Size Associated With Public High Schools,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol 47, 1965.Google Scholar
5. Riew, J., “Economies of Scale in High School Operation,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47, 1965.Google Scholar
6. Sadler, Ronald A., “Optimal School Location and Equal Educational Opportunity in Rural Nevada,” Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada July 1974.Google Scholar
7. State of Nevada, Department of Education, Biennial Report of the Superintendent, selected issues.Google Scholar
8. State of Nevada, Department of Education, Nevada High School Graduation Requirements: Rules and Regulations, January 1973.Google Scholar
9. State of Nevada, Department of Education, School Finance Accounting Manual, January 1970.Google Scholar
10. State of Nevada, Department of Education, Summary of Nevada School District Budget for 1973–1974.Google Scholar
11. Walters, A.A., “Expectations and the Regression Fallacy in Estimating Cost Functions,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. XLII, No. 2, May 1960.Google Scholar
12. White, Fred and Tweeten, Luther, “Optimal School District Size Emphasizing Rural Areas,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 55, No. 1, February 1973.Google Scholar