Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:02:29.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Vertical Distribution of Marine Macroplankton. An Observation on Diurnal Changes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

F. S. Russell
F. S. Russell
Affiliation:
Assistant Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

INTRODUCTION.

1. A series of hauls with the ring-trawl were made at five depths in water 50 metres deep, so that samples were obtained approximately in daylight, at dusk, at midnight, at dawn, and again in daylight.

A depth-recorder was used with the net giving a graphic record of its path through the water.

2. Examination of the catches demonstrated the diurnal changes in vertical distribution of the species caught by the ring-trawl.

3. Four types of behaviour were shown:—

(a) A definite migration to the surface in the dark hours of certain forms living in the deeper layers in the daytime.

(b) An expanding of the distribution of other organisms, that in the daytime had a zone of maximum abundance in the deeper layers, so that they were evenly scattered from the surface downwards.

(c) Certain animals showed no or very little change in their vertical distribution during the dark hours.

(d) A movement up to the midwater region by those forms that during the daytime adopt either a truly benthic existence or are congregated in the water layers immediately adjacent to the sea floor.

(Lists of species grouped under their respective types of behaviour are to be found on page 780.)

4. Many such observations are required before conclusions can be drawn as to the normal diurnal behaviour of plankton animals: this is a definite record of what occurred in this locality in mid-July at a period of full moon in fair weather.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1925 , pp. 769 - 809
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE

1Atkins, W. R. G.Seasonal Changes in the Phosphate Content of Sea Water in relation to the growth of the Algal Plankton during 1923–1924. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XIII, No. 3, p. 701. 1925.Google Scholar
2Esterly, C. O.The occurrence and vertical distribution of the Copepoda of the San Diego region. Univ. Cal. Pub. Zool., Berkeley, Vol. IX, No. 6, pp. 253–340. 1912.Google Scholar
3Farran, G. P.Bulletin Planktonique, Pt. II, p. 84. 1911.Google Scholar
4Gough, L. H. Report on the Plankton of the English Channel in 1903. Mar. Biol. Assoc. Intern. Fish. Invest., 1902–1903. Southern Area. 1905.Google Scholar
5Gurney, R.The larval stages of Processa canaliculata Leach. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. N.S., Vol. XIII, No. 1, p. 263. 1923.Google Scholar
6Harvey, H. W. Hydrography of the English Channel. Cons. Perm. Int. pour I'Explor. de la Mer. Rapport Atlantique. 1924. (In Press.)Google Scholar
7Herdman, W. A., and Scott, A.The Marine Biological Station at Port Erin. Proc. Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc., Vol. XXII, p. 66. 1908.Google Scholar
8Herdman, W. A., and Scott, A.An Intensive Study of the Marine Plankton around the South End of the Isle of Man. Pt. II., Vol. XXIII, p. 323. 1909Google Scholar
9Herdman, W. A., and Scott, A. Ibid., Pt. V, Vol. XXVI, p. 217. 1912.Google Scholar
10Jackson, H. G. Eupagurus. L.M.B.C. Memoirs, No. XXI, Proc. Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc, Vol. XXVII, p. 553. 1913.Google Scholar
11Lebour, M. V.Young Anglers in Captivity and some of their Enemies. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, N.S., Vol. XIII, No. 3, p. 730. 1925.Google Scholar
12Mayer, A. G. Medusæ of the World, Vol. II. The Hydroniedusæ, p. 491.Google Scholar
13Michael, E. L.Classification and Vertical Distribution of the Chæitognatha of the San Diego Region. Univ. Cal. Pub. Zool., Berkeley, Vol. VIII, No. 3, pp. 21–186. 1911.Google Scholar
14Russell, F. S.Depth Recording with Plankton Nets. Nature, Vol. 115, No. 2895, pp. 603–604. April 25th, 1925.Google Scholar
15Sabs, G. O.An account of the Crustacea of Norway, Vol. III, Cumacea, p. 8. 1900.Google Scholar
16Scott, T.Bulletin Planktonique, Pt. II, p. 122. 1911.Google Scholar
17Stephensen, K.Hyperiidea-Amphipoda (Part 2). Rep. Danish Ocean. Exp., 1908–1910, No. 8, Vol II (Biology), D 4, p. 101. 1924.Google Scholar