Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:36:01.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Vertical Distribution and Diurnal Migration of the Crustacea Amphipoda Collected during the SOND Cruise, 1965 II. The Hyperiidea and General Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Michael H. Thurston
Michael H. Thurston
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, Wormley, Godalming, Surrey, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

INTRODUCTION

This paper forms the second and last part of a study of the vertical distribution and migration of pelagic Amphipoda based on material collected off Fuertaventura, Canary Islands, during the SOND Cruise in 1965. The first part (Thurston, 1976b) dealt with the Gammaridea. The data presented herein deal with the Hyperiidea, to which is added a general discussion.

The background to the cruise has been given by Currie, Boden & Kampa (1969), and Foxton (1969) has described the gear and methods used. This analysis is based primarily on samples obtained from a series of 1 m2 ring-net (N 113) hauls, but has been supplemented by selected materials from modified 3 m Isaacs-Kidd Mid-water Trawl (IKMT), neuston net and 1 m2 Rectangular Mid-water Trawl (RMT 1) hauls. Thurston (1976b) has discussed the limitations of the sampling techniques as they affect the present results.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , May 1976 , pp. 383 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angel, M. V., 1969. Planktonic ostracods from the Canary Island region; their depth distributions, diurnal migrations, and community organisation. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 515–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschoff, J., 1966. Circadian activity patterns with two peaks. Ecology, 47, 657–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badcock, J., 1970. The vertical distribution of mesopelagic fishes collected on the SOND Cruise. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 1001–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. De C., 1970. The vertical distribution of euphausiids near Fuertaventura, Canary Islands (‘Discovery’ SOND Cruise, 1965). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 301–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. De C., Clarke, M. R. & Harris, M. J., 1973. The N.I.O. combination net (RMT 1 + 8) and further developments of rectangular midwater trawls. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 53, 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banse, K., 1964. On the vertical distribution of zooplankton in the sea. In Progress in Oceanography, vol. 2 (ed. Sears, M.), pp. 55–125. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Barnard, K. H., 1930. Crustacea. XI. Amphipoda. Natural History Report. British Antarctic Terra Nova Expedition, 1910, Zoology, 8 (4), 307–454.Google Scholar
Barnard, K. H., 1931. Amphipoda. Great Barrier Reef Expedition 1928–29, Scientific Reports, 4 (4), 111–135.Google Scholar
Barnard, K. H., 1932. Amphipoda. ‘Discovery’ Reports, 5, 1–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, K. H., 1937. Amphipoda. John Murray Expedition 1933–34, Scientific Reports, 4 (6), 131–201.Google Scholar
Bary, B. M., 1963. Distribution of Atlantic pelagic organisms in relation to surface water bodies. In Marine Distributions (ed. Dunbar, M. J.), pp. 51–67. Toronto: University of Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behning, A., 1925. Amphipoda der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. 1. Hyperiidea Fam. Vibiliidae Claus 1872. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer ‘Valdivia’ 1898–1899, 19 (9), 479–500.Google Scholar
Behning, A., 1939. Die Amphipoda-Hyperiidea der den Fernen Osten der UdSSR. umgrendzenden Meere. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie u Hydrographie, 38, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogorov, B. G., 1958. Biogeographical regions of the plankton of the north-western Pacific Ocean and their influence on the deep-sea. Deep-Sea Research, 5, 149–161.Google Scholar
Bovallius, C., 1889. Contributions to a monograph of the Amphipoda Hyperiidea. Part 1: 2. The families Cyllopodidae, Paraphronimidae, Thaumatopsidae, Mimonectidae, Hyperiidae, Phronimidae and Anchylomeridae. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar, 22 (7), 1–434.Google Scholar
Bovallius, C., 1890. The oxycephalids. Nova acta Regiae Societatis scientiarum upsaliensis, Ser. III, 14 (4), 1–141.Google Scholar
Bowman, T. E., 1960. The pelagic amphipod genus Parathemisto (Hyperiidea: Hyperiidae) in the north Pacific and adjacent Arctic Ocean. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 112, 343–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, T. E., 1973. Pelagic amphipods of the genus Hyperia and closely related genera (Hyperiidea: Hyperiidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, No. 136, 1–76.Google Scholar
Bowman, T. E. & Gruner, H.-E., 1973. The families and genera of Hyperiidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, No. 146, 1–64.Google Scholar
Brinton, E., 1967. Vertical migration and avoidance capability of euphausiids in the California Current. Limnology and Oceanography, 12, 451–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brusca, G. J., 1967. The ecology of pelagic Amphipoda. 1. Species accounts, vertical zonation and migration of Amphipoda from the waters off Southern California. Pacific Science, 21, 382–393.Google Scholar
Brusca, G. J., 1973. Pelagic Amphipoda from the waters near Oahu, Hawaii, excluding the family Scinidae. Pacific Science, 27, 8–27.Google Scholar
Bruun, A., 1943. The biology of Spirilla spirula (L.). Dana Reports, No. 24, 1–46.Google Scholar
Candeias, A., 1934. Crustáceos planctónicos das Costas de Portugal. Memórias e estudos Museu zoológico da Universidade de Coimbra, Sér. 1, No. 75, 1–8.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1900. Amphipodes provenant des campagnes de l'Hirondelle (1885–1888). Résultats des campagnes scientifique accompliés sur son yacht par Albert Ier Prince Souverain de Monaco 16, 1–195.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1905. Liste des Scinidae de la Princesse Alice et description d'une espèce nouvelle. Bulletin de Musée océanographique de Monaco, No. 37, 1–5.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1919. Révision des Scinidae provenant des campagnes de S.A.S. le Prince de Monaco. Bulletin de l'Institut océanographique de Monaco, No. 352, 1–24.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1935. Amphipodes provenant des campagnes scientifiques du Prince Albert ler de Monaco. Résuhats des campagnes scientifiques accompliés sur son yacht par Albert ler Prince Souverain de Monaco, 90, 1–230.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E. & Fage, L., 1925. Amphipodes. Faune de France, 9, 1–488.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. R., 1969. Cephalopoda collected on the SOND Cruise. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 961–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, C., 1879. Die Gattungen und Arten der Platysceliden in systematischer Übersicht. Arbeiten aus den Zoologischen Instituten der Universität Wien, 2, 147–198.Google Scholar
Claus, C., 1887. Die Platysceliden. 77 pp. Vienna: Alfred Hölder.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutter, R. I. & Anraku, M., 1968. Avoidance of samplers. Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology, 2, 57–76.Google Scholar
Currie, R. I., Boden, B. P. & Kampa, E. M., 1969. An investigation on sonic-scattering layers: the R.R.S. ‘Discovery’ SOND Cruise, 1965. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 489–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, D. H., 1951. The vertical migration of planktonic Crustacea. Biological Reviews, 26, 158–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dick, R. I., 1970. Hyperiidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) keys to South African genera and species, and a distribution list. Annals of the South African Museum, 57, Part 3, 25–86.Google Scholar
Evans, F., 1961. The planktonic Crustacea of the Petula transatlantic expedition. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 172, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fage, L., 1960. Oxycephalidae, amphipodes pelagique. Dana Reports, No. 52, 1–145.Google Scholar
Fleminger, A., Isaacs, J. D. & Wyllie, J. G., 1974. Zooplankton biomass measurements from CalCOFI cruises of July 1955 to 1959 and remarks on comparisons with results from October, January and April cruises of 1955 to 1959. California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigation, Atlas, No. 21, 118 pp.Google Scholar
Foxton, P., 1969. SOND Cruise 1965. Biological sampling methods and procedures. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxton, P., 1970 a. The vertical distribution of pelagic decapods (Crustacea: Natantia) collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. I. The Caridea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 939–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxton, P., 1970 b. The vertical distribution of pelagic decapods (Crustacea: Natantia) collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. II. The Penaeidea and general discussion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 961–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxton, P. & Roe, H. S. J., 1974. Observations on the nocturnal feeding of some mesopelagic decapod Crustacea. Marine Biology, 28, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franqueville, C., 1971. Macroplancton profond (invertébrés) de la Mediterranée nord-occidental. Téthys, 3, 11–56.Google Scholar
Fraser, J. H., 1961. The oceanic and bathypelagic plankton of the north-eastern Atlantic and its possible significance to fisheries. Marine Research, 1961, No. 4, 1–48.Google Scholar
Furnestin, M.-L., 1957. Chaetognaths et zooplancton du secteur Atlantique marocain. Revue des Travaux. Institut des pêches maritimes, 21, 1–356.Google Scholar
Grice, G. D. & Hart, A. D., 1962. The abundance, seasonal occurrence and distribution of the epizooplankton between New York and Bermuda. Ecological Monographs, 32, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, A. C. & Gunther, E. R., 1935. The plankton of the South Georgia whaling grounds and adjacent waters. ‘Discovery’ Reports, 9, 1–456.Google Scholar
Harker, J. E., 1958. Diurnal rhythms in the animal kingdom. Biological Reviews, 33, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. E., 1963. The role of endogenous rhythms in vertical migration. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 43, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hure, J., 1955. Distribution annuelle verticale du zooplancton sur une station de l'Adriatique meridionale. Acta adriatica, 7 (7), 1–72.Google Scholar
Hurley, D. E., 1956. Bathypelagic and other Hyperiidea from Californian waters. Occasional Papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation, No. 18, 1–25.Google Scholar
Hurley, D. E., 1960. Pelagic Amphipoda of the N.Z.O.I. Pacific cruise, March 1958. New Zealand Journal of Science, 3, 274–289.Google Scholar
Hurley, D. E., 1969. Amphipoda Hyperiidea. In Distribution of Selected Groups of Marine Invertebrates in Waters South of 35°s Latitude, folio 11 (ed. Bushnell, V. C. and Hedgpeth, J. W.), pp. 32–4. Antarctic Map Folio Series.Google Scholar
Isaacs, J. D., Tont, S. A. & Wick, G. L., 1974. Deep scattering layers: vertical migration as a tactic for finding food. Deep-Sea Research, 21, 651–656.Google Scholar
Johansen, A. C., 1925. On the diurnal vertical movements of young of some fishes in Danish waters. Meddelelser fra Kommissionen for Havundersøgelser, Serie: Fiskeri, 8 (2), 1–27.Google Scholar
Jossi, J. W., 1973. Distribution and abundance of pelagic Amphipoda in the Arabian Sea, Java Sea and Indian Ocean with notes on their contribution to the total plankton. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 14, 115–138.Google Scholar
Kane, J. E., 1962. Amphipoda from waters south of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Science, 5, 295–315.Google Scholar
King, J. E. & Hida, T. S., 1954. Variations in zooplankton abundance in Hawaiian waters, 1950–1952. Special Scientific Report. United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (Fisheries), No. 118, 1–66.Google Scholar
King, J. E. & Hida, T. S., 1957. Zooplankton abundance in the central Pacific. Part II. Fishery Bulletin. Fish and Wildlife Service. United States Department of the Interior, 57 (118), 365–396.Google Scholar
Laval, P., 1963. Sur la biologie et les larves de Vibilia armata Bov. et de V. propinqua Stebb., Amphipodes Hypérides. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l'Académie des sciences, 257. 1389–1392.Google Scholar
Laval, P., 1965. Présence d'une période larvaire au début du développement de certains Hypérides parasites (Crustaces Amphipodes). Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l'Academie des sciences, 260, 6195–6198.Google Scholar
Laval, P., 1966. Bougisia ornata, genre et espèce nouveaux de la famille des Hyperiidae (Amphipoda, Hyperiidea). Crustaceana, 10, 210–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laval, P., 1968 a. Developpement en élevage et systématique d'Hyperia schizogeneios Stebb. (Amphipoda, Hypéride). Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale, 109, 25–67.Google Scholar
Laval, P., 1968 b. Observations sur la biologie de Phronima curvipes Voss. (Amphipode Hypéride) et description du mâle adult. Cahiers de biologie marine, 9, 347–362.Google Scholar
Laval, P., 1970. Sur les Phronimidae de l'océan Indien et de l'océan Pacifique avec la validation de Phronima bucephala Giles, 1887 comme espèce distincte de P. colletti Bov., 1887 (Crustacés Amphipodes). Cahiers de l'Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique Outre-Mer, série Océanographie, 8 (1), 47–57.Google Scholar
Laval, P., 1972. Comportement parasitisme et écologie d'Hyperia schizogeneios Stebb. (Amphipode Hypéride) dans le plancton de Villefranche-sur-Mer. Annales de l'Institut océanographique, 48, 49–74.Google Scholar
Laval, P., 1974. Un modèle mathématique de l'évitement d'un filet à plancton, son application pratique, et sa vérification indirecte en recourant au parasitisme de l'amphipode hypéride Vibilia armata Bovallius. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 14, 57–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legand, M., 1958. Etude sommaire des variations quantitatives diurnes du zooplancton autour de la Nouvelle Caledonie. Rapport Scientifique. Institut français d'Océanie (Océanographie), No. 6, 1–42.Google Scholar
Legand, M., Bourret, P., Fourmanoir, P., Grandperrin, R., Guérédrat, J. A., Michel, A., Rancurel, P., Repelin, R. & Roger, C., 1972. Relations trophiques et distributions verticales en milieu pélagique dans l'ocean Pacifique intertropical. Cahiers de l'Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique Outre-Mer, série Oceanographie, 10 (4), 303–393.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. B. & Fish, A. G., 1969. Seasonal variation of the zooplankton fauna of surface waters entering the Caribbean Sea at Barbados. Caribbean Journal of Science, 9 (1–2), 1–24.Google Scholar
Lo, Bianco S., 1903. Le pesche abissali eseguite da F. A. Krupp col yacht Puritan nelle adiacenze di Capri ed in altre località del Mediterraneo. Mitteilungen aus der Zoologischen Station zu Neapel, 16, 109–279.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. A., 1934. Distribution of the macroplankton in the Atlantic sector of the Antarctic. ‘Discovery’ Reports, 9, 65–160.Google Scholar
Merrett, N. R. & Roe, H. S. J., 1974. Patterns and selectivity in the feeding of certain mesopelagic fishes. Marine Biology, 28, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, K., 1963. Diurnal rhythm in ‘organic drift’ of Gammarus pulex. Nature, London, 198, 806–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T. S., 1968. Calanoid copepods from the central North Pacific Ocean. Fishery Bulletin. Fish and Wildlife Service. United States Department of the Interior, 66, 527–572.Google Scholar
Pearre, S., 1973. Vertical migration and feeding in Sagitta elegans Verrill. Ecology, 54, 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirlot, J. M., 1929. Résultats zoologiques de la croisière Atlantique de 1’ ‘Armauer Hansen’. I. Les amphipodes hypérides. Mémoires de la Société royale des sciences de Liège, Ser. 3, 15 (1), 1–196.Google Scholar
Pirlot, J. M., 1930. Les amphipodes de l'expedition du Siboga. Premiére partie. Les amphipodes hypérides (à l'exception des Thaumatopsidae et des Oxycephalidae). Siboga Expeditie, 33 a, Livr. 113, 1–54.Google Scholar
Pirlot, J. M., 1938. Les amphipodes gammarides. III. Les amphipodes hypérides families des Lanceolidae, Cystisomatidae et Oxycephalidae et la sexualité chez Cystisoma, Guérin Ménéville. Siboga Expeditie, 33 f, Livr. 132, 329–388.Google Scholar
Pirlot, J. M., 1939. Sur les amphipodes hypérides provenant des croisières du Prince Albert ler de Monaco. Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accompliés sur son yacht par Albert ler Prince Souvrain de Monaco, 102, 1–64.Google Scholar
Przibram, H., 1929. Quanta in biology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 49, 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, P. R., 1974. The vertical distribution of the siphonophores collected during the SOND cruise, 1965. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 25–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, T. S. S., 1973. Zooplankton studies in the Indian Ocean. In The Biology of the Indian Ocean (ed. Zeitzschel, B.), pp. 243–255. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1955. Amphipoda (Hyperiidea) of the coast of tropical west Africa. Atlantide Report, No. 3, 7–40.Google Scholar
Repelin, R., 1971. Phronimidae du bassin Indo-Australien (Amphipodes Hypérides), cycle genital et répartition saisonnière, relations quantitatives et écologiques. Cahiers de l'Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique Outre-Mer, série Océanographie, 8 (2), 65–109 (1970).Google Scholar
Roe, H. S. J., 1972 a. The vertical distributions and diurnal migrations of calanoid copepods collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. I. The total population and general discussion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 277–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, H. S. J., 1972 b. The vertical distributions and diurnal migrations of calanoid copepods collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. II. Systematic account: families Calanidae up to and including the Aetideidae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 315–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, H. S. J., 1972 c. The vertical distributions and diurnal migrations of calanoid copepods collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. III. Systematic account: families Euchaetidae up to and including the Metridiidae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 525–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, H. S. J., 1972 d. The vertical distribution and diurnal migrations of calanoid copepods collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. IV. Systematic account of families Lucicutiidae to Candaciidae. The relative abundance of the numerically most important genera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 1021–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, H. S. J., 1974. Observations on the diurnal migrations of an oceanic animal community. Marine Biology, 28, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudjakov, J. A., 1970. The possible causes of diel vertical migrations of planktonic animals. Marine Biology, 6, 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1927. The vertical distribution of plankton in the sea. Biological Reviews, 2, 213–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, C. T., 1969. The systematics and biology of the family Phronimidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Dana Reports, No. 74, 1–100.Google Scholar
Shih, C. T., 1971. Phronimidae (Amphipoda, Hyperiidea) of the south Pacific Ocean. Crustaceana, 20, 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, C. R., 1945. The Amphipoda of the Bermuda Oceanographic Expeditions, 1929–1931. Zoologica, New York, 30, 185–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singarajah, K. V., Moyse, J. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1967. The effect of feeding on the phototactic behaviour of cirripede nauplii. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1, 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spandl, H., 1924. Die Amphipoden des Roten Meeres. Denkschriften der Akademie der Wissenschaften, 99, 19–73.Google Scholar
Spandl, H., 1927. Die Hyperiiden (exkl. Hyperiidea Gammaroidea und Phronimidae) der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, 19, Zoologie 11, 145–287.Google Scholar
Stebbing, T. R. R., 1888. Amphipoda. Report of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. ‘Challenger’ during the years 1873–1876, 29, 1–1737.Google Scholar
Stebbing, T. R. R., 1904. Biscayan Plankton. II. The Amphipoda and Cladocera, with notes on a larval thyrostracan. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology), Ser. 2, to, 13–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1918. Hyperiidea-Amphipoda (Lanceolidae, Scinidae, Vibiliidae, Thaumatopsidae). Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions, 1908–10, to the Mediterranean and adjacent seas, 2, Biology, D 2, 1–70.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K. 1923. Crustacea Malacostraca. V. Amphipoda I. Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 3 (8), 1–100.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1924. Hyperiidea-Amphipoda 2. Paraphronimidae, Hyperiidae, Dairellidae, Phronimidae, Anchylomeridae. Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions, 1908–1910, to the Mediterranean and adjacent seas, 2, Biology, D 4, 71–149.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1925. Hyperiidea-Amphipoda 3. Lycaeopsidae, Pronoidae, Lycaeidae, Brachyscelidae, Oxycephalidae, Parascelidae, Platyscelidae. Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions, 1908–10, to the Mediterranean and adjacent seas, 2, Biology, D 5, 151–252.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K. & Pirlot, J. M., 1931. Les amphipodes hypérides du genre Mimonectes et de quelques genres voisin, Archives de zoologie expérimental et générate, 71, 501—553.Google Scholar
Steuer, A., 1913. Einige Ergebnisse der VII. Terminfahrt S.M.S. Najade im Sommer 1912 in der Adria. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie u Hydrographie, 5 (5/6), 551–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sverdrup, H. U., Johnson, M. W. & Flemming, R. H., 1942. The Oceans. 1060 pp. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Tattersall, W. M., 1906. The marine fauna of the coast of Ireland. VIII. Pelagic Amphipoda of the Irish Atlantic slope. Scientific Investigations of the Fisheries Branch. Department of Agriculture and Technical Instruction for Ireland for 1905, Appendix No. 4, 39 pp.Google Scholar
Thurston, M. H., 1973. On the identity of Lanceola aestiva Stebbing, 1888 (Amphipoda, Lanceolidae). Crustaceana, 24, 334–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, M. H., 1976 a. New pelagic amphipods (Crustacea: Amphipoda) collected on the SOND Cruise. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, M. H., 1976 b. The vertical distribution and diurnal migration of the Crustacea Amphipoda collected during the SOND Cruise, 1965. I. The Gammaridea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1957. Hyperiids (Amphipoda) of the northwestern Pacific Ocean. 1. Tribe Hyperiidea Physosomata. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR 20, 186–227. (English translation: Marine Biology, pp. 149–184. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Biological Sciences, 1959.)Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1960. Hyperiidea Physosomata of the tropical Pacific Ocean. Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 41, 198–247.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1962. Hyperiidea (Amphipoda) collected by the Soviet Antarctic Expedition on d/e ‘Ob’ south of 40 S. (In Russian.) Issledovaniya Fauny Morei I (IX), Resultaty biologicheskikh issledovanii Sovetskoi antarkticheskoi ekspeditsii (1955–1958), 1, 1–35. (English translation: Biological Reports of the Soviet Antarctic Expedition (1955–1958), 1, 1–32. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1966.)Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1964. Hyperiidea Physosomata from the northern part of the Indian Ocean (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 65, 107–151.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1968. Vertical Distribution of the Oceanic Zooplankton. 339 pp. (In Russian.) Moscow: Izdatelstvo Nauka. (English translation: Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1970.)Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1970. New data on the amphipods Hyperiidea Physosomata of the north-western part of the Pacific Ocean. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 86, 382–400. (English translation: Fauna of the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and its Environment, 398–418. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1972.)Google Scholar
Vives, F., 1966. Zooplancton néritico de las aguas de Castellón (Mediterráneo Occidental). Investigación pesquera, 30, 49–166.Google Scholar
Vosseler, J., 1901. Die Amphipoden der Plankton-Expedition. 1. Thiel. Hyperiidea 1. Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiffung, 2, G.e., 1–129.Google Scholar
Wagler, E., 1926. Amphipoda 2: Scinidae der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer ‘Valdivia’ 1898–1899, 20 (6), 317–446.Google Scholar
Wagler, E., 1927. Die Sciniden der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, 19, Zoologie 11, 85–111.Google Scholar
Walker, A. O., 1909. Amphipoda Hyperiidea of the ‘Sealark’ expedition to the Indian Ocean. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology), Ser. 2, 13, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterman, T. H., Nunnemacher, R. F., Chace, F. A. & Clarke, G. L., 1939. Diurnal vertical migrations of deep-water plankton. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 76, 256–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickstead, J. H., 1962. Food and feeding in pelagic copepods. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 139, 545–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woltereck, R., 1904. Zweite Mitteilung über die Hyperiden der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. ‘Physosoma’ ein neuer pelagischer Larven typus; nebst Bemerkungen zur Biologie von Thaumatops und Phronima. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 27, 553–563.Google Scholar
Woltereck, R., 1927. Die Lanceoliden und Mimonectiden der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, 19, Zoologie 11, 57–84.Google Scholar
Yoo, K. I., 1971. The biology of the pelagic amphipod Primno macropa Guér. in the western North Pacific. 1. Systematics. Korean Journal of Zoology, 14, 132–138.Google Scholar
Yoo, K. I., 1972. The biology of the pelagic amphipod, Primno macropa Guér., in the western North Pacific. 2. Geographical distribution and vertical distribution pattern. Korean Journal of Zoology, 15, 87–91.Google Scholar