Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:26:46.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Valve structure and growth in the chiton Lepidochitona cinereus (Polyplacophora: Ischnochitonidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. M. Baxter  and
A. M. Jones
J. M. Baxter
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland
A. M. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Valve structure was investigated using light and scanning electron microscopy and each valve was found to comprise four layers; periostracum (dorsal), tegmentum, articulamentum and hypostracum (ventral). The penetration of the valves by the aesthetes within channels is described and three distinct types of aesthete channels are identified, namely, multiple branch aesthete channels, slit ray aesthete channels and jugal sinus aesthete channels. The distribution of the different aesthete channels within the various valves is defined and their relationship with the valve external sculpturing is described. The process of valve growth by marginal increment is discussed in relation to the formation of the aesthetes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 65 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arey, L. B. & Crozier, W. F., 1919. The sensory responses of chitons. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 29, 157–260.Google Scholar
Baxter, J. M., 1978. Studies on the Biology of Lepidochitona cinereus (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). Ph.D. Thesis, Dundee University.Google Scholar
Baxter, J. M. & Jones, A. M., 1978. Growth and population structure of Lepidochitona cinereus (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) infected with Minchinia chitonis (Protozoa: Sporozoa) at East-haven, Scotland. Marine Biology 46, 305–313.Google Scholar
Beedham, G. E. & Trueman, E. R., 1967. The relationship of the mantle and shell of the polyplacophora in comparison with that of other Mollusca. Journal of Zoology, 151, 215–231.Google Scholar
Bergenhayn, J. R. M., 1930. Kurje Bemerkungen der Kenntnis der Schalenstruktur und Systematik der Loricaten. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar, 9 (3), 54 pp.Google Scholar
Boggild, O. B., 1930. The shell structure of the mollusks. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter (Naturvidenskabelig og Mathematisk Afdeling), 2, 235–326.Google Scholar
Boyle, P. R., 1969. Fine structure of the eyes of Onithochiton neglectus (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). Zeitschrift fur Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anatomie, 102, 313–332.Google Scholar
Boyle, P. R., 1972. The aesthetes of chitons. I. Role in the light response of whole animals. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 1, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, P. R., 1974. The aesthetes of chitons. II. Fine structure in Lepidochitona cinereus (L.). Cell and Tissue Research, 153, 383–398.Google ScholarPubMed
Boyle, P. R., 1976. The aesthetes of chitons. III. Shell surface observations. Cell and Tissue Research, 172, 379–388.Google Scholar
Bunn, C. W., 1964. Crystals: Their Role in Nature and in Science, 286 pp. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cornish., V. & Kendall, P. F., 1888. On the Mineralogical Constituents of Calcareous Organisms (extracted from Geological Magazine, London). London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Crozier, W. J., 1920. Note on the photic sensitivity of the chitons. American Naturalist, 54, 376–380.Google Scholar
Dunachie, J. F., 1963. The periostracum of Mytilus edulis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 65, 383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrow, G. E., 1971. Periodicity structures in the bivalve shell: experiments to establish growth controls in Cerastoderma edule from the Thames estuary. Palaeontology, 14, 571–588.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E. & Franc, A., 1960. Classe des Polyplacophores. In Traité de Zoologie, vol. 5 (ed. P.-P., Grasse), pp. 1701–1785. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. P., 1978. Photorezeptor cells in chiton aesthetes (Mollusca, Polyplacophora, Chitonidae). Spixiana, 1, 209–213.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. P. & Renner, M., 1978. Die Feinstruktur der Ästheten von Chiton olivaceus (Mollusca, Polyplacophora). Helgoldānder wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 31, 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F. P. & Renner., M., 1979. SEM-observations on the shell plates of three polyplacophorans (Mollusca, Amphineura). Spixiana, 2, 49—58.Google Scholar
Kleber, W., 1970. An Introduction to Crystallography. 366 pp. Berlin: VEB Verlag Technik.Google Scholar
Knorre, H. von, 1925. Die Schale und die Rückensinnes-organe von Trachydermon (Chiton) cinereus (L.) und die Ceylonischen Chitonen der Sammlung Plate. Jenaische Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft, 61, 470–628.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., 1953. A key for use in the identification of British chitons. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 29, 241–248.Google Scholar
Moseley, H. N., 1885. On the presence of eyes in the shells of certain Chitonidae, and on the structure of the organs. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 25, 37–60.Google Scholar
Mutvei, H., 1964. On the shells of Nautilus and Spirula with notes on the shell secretion in noncephalopod molluscs. Arkivfor zoologi, 16, 223–278.Google Scholar
Omelich, P., 1967. The behavioural role and the structure of the aesthetes of chitons. Veliger, 10, 77–82.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G., 1960. Amphineura. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part 1. Mollusca, vol. 1 (ed. Moore, R. C.), pp. 141–176. Kansas: The University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar