Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:34:36.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ultrastructure and histochemistry of the larval cement of Ostrea edulis L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

H. J. Cranfield*
Affiliation:
N.E.R.C. Unit of Marine Invertebrate Biology, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, U.K.
*
*Present address: Fisheries Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, P.O. Box 19062, Wellington, New Zealand.

Extract

The larval cement of Ostrea edulis is formed from material secreted by the settling larva from two types of pedal gland (Cranfield, 1973b). Light microscope observations suggested that there were fibrous regions in this cement. The histochemistry and ultrastructure of the cement were therefore examined to establish the nature of this fibrous structure and to determine the part each of the two secretions might play in its formation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C. W. M., 1957. A p-dimethyl amino benzaldehyde-nitrite method for the histochemical demonstration of tryptophane and related compounds. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 10, 5662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, B. L., 1969. The gregarious behaviour of the larvae of Ostrea edulis L. at settlement. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 327–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranfield, H. J., 1973a. A study of the morphology, ultrastructure and histochemistry of the foot of the pediveliger of Ostrea edulis. Marine Biology, 22, 187202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranfield, H. J., 1973b. Observations on the function of the glands of the foot of the pediveliger of Ostrea edulis during settlement. Marine Biology, 22, 211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenner, G. G. & Lillie, R. D., 1959. Observations on the diazotization-coupling reaction for the histochemical demonstration of tyrosine: Metal chelation and formazan variants. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 7, 416–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazia, D., Brewer, P. A. & Alfert, M., 1953. The cytochemical staining and measurement of protein with mercuric bromophenol blue. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 104, 5767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowry, R. W., 1963. The special value of methods that colour both acidic and vicinal hydroxyl groups in the histochemical study of mucins. With revised directions for the colloidal iron stain, the use of Alcian blue G8X and their combinations with the periodic acid-Schiff reaction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 106, 402–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E., 1968. Histochemistry theoretical and applied., 1, 3rd edn, 759 pp. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Spicer, S. S., 1965. Diamine methods for differentiating mucosubstances histochemically. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 13, 211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar