Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-26vmc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:12:22.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tube Formation in Pomatoceros triqueter L

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Extract

As a serpulid, Pomatoceros triqueter L. realises to the highest degree the adaptation to a sedentary life. The calcareous tube in which this annelid lives is characterised by a keel running along its upper surface. It is rather misleading to say that this tube is triangular in section. Figure 2 shows a newly formed calcareous rod; it is spur-shaped; the two rami of the spur might approach each other so nearly as to simulate an almost complete tube. The substratum in this species not only serves as a support, but completes the tube. This is in accordance with the fact that the tubes of Pomatoceros never extend freely off the support as happens with tubes of other serpulids–Protula, for instance. The aim of this paper is to record some observations on the way an adult Pomatoceros endeavours to build a new calcareous tube if it is artificially removed from its old one. I undertook this observation as original work at Roscoff, where a complete literature was not available. I discovered later that Harms, in the course of his research on regeneration in Hydroides pectinata, arrived at identical results. My paper cannot therefore pretend to more than a confirmation of previous results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE

Claparéde, E.Recherches sur la structure des Annélides Sédentaires. Mém. de la Soc. de Phys. et d'Hist. nat., T. XXII. Genéve, 1873.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P.Recherches sur les Ampharétiens. Thése de Sciences, Paris, 1897. Bull. Scient. France et Belg., T. XXX.Google Scholar
Gourret, P.Sur quelques Annélides sédentaires (genre Hydroides, Pomatoceros et Hermella) du Golfe de Marseille. C. R. Assoc. française avancement de Sci., 30. Ajaccio, 1901.Google Scholar
Hargitt, C. W.The behaviour of tubicolous annelids. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole. Vol. 22, 1912.Google Scholar
Harms, W.Beobachtungen über den natürlichen Tod der Tiere. I. Mitt: Der Tod bei Hydroides pectinata Phil, nebst Bemerkungen über die Biologie dieses Wurmes, Zool. Anz., Bd. 40. Leipzig, 1912.Google Scholar
Meyer, ED.Studien über den Körperbau den Anneliden. Mitteilungen aus der Zoologischen Station zu Neapel, Bd. 8, 1888.Google Scholar
Prenant, M.Contribution á l'étude cytologique du calcaire. Bull, biol. Paris. T. LVIII, Fasc. 3, 1924.Google Scholar
Quatrefages, DE.Hist. Nat. des Annelés marins et d'eau douce. T. II (pp. 412415). Paris, 1865.Google Scholar
Schiveley, M. A. Structure and development of Spirorbis borealis. Proc. Ac. Nat. Sc, Philadelphia, 1897.Google Scholar
Soulier, A. Études sur quelques points de l'anatomie des Annélides tubicoles de la Région de Cette. Thése de Paris, Trav. Inst. Zool. Montpellier et Stat. Mar. Cette. Nouv. Ser. Mém., No. 2, 1891.Google Scholar
Watson, A. Note on the habits and building organ of the tubicolous polychæte worm Pectinaria (Lagis) koreni. Rep. Brit. Assocn., 1913 (1914).Google Scholar