Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:27:47.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Thixotropy and Dilatancy of a Marine Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Garth Chapman
Garth Chapman
Affiliation:
From the Department of Zoology, Queen Mary College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Modifications are described to the penetrometer originally designed by Chapman & Newell (1947) for the measurement of the resistance to penetration of marine soils.

An account is given of qualitative and quantitative tests made during the study of the thixotropy and dilatancy of the muddy sand of the Arenicola region of the shore at Whitstable. The results of tests made with the dilatancy viscometer originally used by Freundlich & Röder are shown not to be in clear agreement with the observed behaviour of the soil.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , June 1949 , pp. 123 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boswell, P. G. H., 1948. The thixotropy of certain sedimentary rocks. Science Progress, No. 143, pp. 412–22.Google Scholar
Chapman, G. & Newell, G. E., 1947. The role of the body-fluid in relation to movement in soft-bodied invertebrates. I. The burrowing of Arenicola. Proc. Roy. Soc., B, Vol. CXXXIV, pp. 431–55.Google Scholar
Freundlich, H., 1935. Thixotropy. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Freundlich, H. & Jones, A. D., 1936. Sedimentation volume, dilatancy, thixotropy and plastic properties of concentrated suspensions. Journ. Phys. Chem., Vol. XL, pp. 1217–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freundlich, H. & Juliusburger, F., 1935. Quicksand as a thixotropic system. Trans. Faraday Soc., Vol. XXXI, pp. 769–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freundlich, H. & Röder, H. L., 1938. Dilatancy and its relation to thixotropy. Trans. Faraday Soc., Vol. XXXIV, pp. 308–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruyt, H. R. & Van Selms, F. G., 1943 a. The influence of traces of water on the plasticity of starch and quartz suspensions in organic media. Rec Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, Vol. LXII, pp. 407–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruyt, H. R. & Van Selms, F. G., 1943 b. The influence of a third phase on the rheology of suspensions. Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, Vol. LXII, pp. 415–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, G. E. & Chapman, G., 1948. Distribution of lugworms. Nature, Vol. CLXII, p. 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryce-Jones, J., 1946. The flow of suspensions—thixotropy and dilatancy. Proc. Univ. Durham Philos. Soc., Vol. X, pp. 427–67.Google Scholar
Reynolds, O., 1885. On the dilatancy of media composed of rigid particles in contact. With experimental illustrations. Phil. Mag., Vol. XX, pp. 469–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. W., 1932. Soils, their Origin, Constitution and Classification. London.Google Scholar
Röder, H. L., 1939. Rheology of Suspensions. Amsterdam: Paris.Google Scholar
Van Selms, F. G. & Kruyt, H. R., 1943. Apparatus for measuring the consistency of plastic suspensions. Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, Vol. LXII, pp. 398–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. P., 1945. The mode of life of Arenicola marina L. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXVI, pp. 170–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar