Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:13:16.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermal Conductivity of Sand and Its Effect on The Temperature of Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta Caretta) Nests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J.R. Speakman ,
G.C. Hays  and
E. Lindblad
J.R. Speakman
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ.
G.C. Hays
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ.
E. Lindblad
Affiliation:
Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation, Sanibel Island, Florida 33957–0839, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The conductivity of sand at a depth of 30–50 cm was measured at 15 sites on the beach at Captiva Island in south-west Florida which is used by nesting loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta). The mean daily temperature of the sand was correlated with conductivity at the same depth measured the same day (r=0·611). When day to day variation was removed the correlation between nest temperature and conductivity increased to 0·694. The sand was highly variable in its grain structure. The dominant variability (80·6%) was redescribed by the first two principal components of a Principal Components Analysis (PCA). These two components were influenced mostly by percentages of large (> 1 mm) and small (< 500 μm) grains respectively. Conductivity was strongly correlated with the grain structure of the sand. The first three principal components describing sand grain structure, explained 84·1% of the variation in conductivity. Moisture content of the sand (always < 5%) was not an important factor. Sites dominated by larger grains generally had poorer conductivity and were cooler. Comparisons of eight nests to seven adjacent random sites revealed no strong evidence for directional selection in nest placement relative to sand conductivity. The variance in conductivities recorded at nests was also not significantly different from the variance at random sites.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 78 , Issue 4 , November 1998 , pp. 1337 - 1352
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, S., 1981. The racoon (Procyon lotor) on St. Catherines Island, Georgia. 7. Nesting sea turtles and foraging racoons. American Museum Noviatates, 2713, 1–9.Google Scholar
Bjorndal, K.A. & Bolten, A.B., 1992. Spatial distribution of green turtle (Chelonia mydas) nests at, Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Copeia, 1992, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodie, J.R., Smith, K.R. & Burke, V.J., 1996. A comparison of diel nest temperature and nest site selection for 2 sympatric species of fresh water turtles. American Midland Naturalist, 136, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, J.J., 1980. Sex determination in reptiles. Quarterly Review of Biology 55, 3–21.Google Scholar
Bull, J.J., 1983. Evolution of sex determining mechanisms. Ontario: Benjamin/Cummings Don Mills.Google Scholar
Carr, A. & Hirth, H., 1962. The ecology and migrations of sea turtles. 5. Comparative features of isolated green turtle colonies. American Museum Novitates, 2091, 1–42.Google Scholar
Carr, A. & Ogren, L., 1959. The ecology and migrations of sea turtles. 3. Dermochelys in Costa Rica. American Museum Novitates, 1958, 5–48.Google Scholar
Chan, E.H. & Liew, H.C., 1995. Incubation temperatures and sex ratios in the Malaysian leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea. Biological Conservation, 74, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, M.A.G., 1949. The thixotropy and dilitancy of marine soils. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 28, 123–140.Google Scholar
Davenport, J., 1989. Sea turtles and the greenhouse effect. British Herpetological Society Bulletin, 29, 11–15.Google Scholar
Dodd, C.K. Jr, 1988. Synopsis of the biological data on the loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758). Biological Report of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, 88, 110 pp.Google Scholar
Dunham, A.E. & Overall, K.L., 1994. Population responses to environmental change life history variation, individual based models and the population dynamics of short lived organisms. American Zoologist, 34, 382–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, K.L., 1987. Environmental unpredictability and leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) nest loss. Herpetologica, 43, 315–323.Google Scholar
Georges, A., 1992. Thermal characteristics and sex determination in field nests of the pig nosed turtle Carettochelys insculpta (Chelonia, Carettochelydidae), from Northern Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology, 40, 511–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georges, A., Limpus, C. & Stoutjesdijk, R., 1994. Hatchling sex in the marine turtle Caretta caretta is determined by the proportion of development at a temperature, not daily duration of exposure. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 270, 432–444.Google Scholar
Hays, G.C., Adams, C.R., Mortimer, J.A. & Speakman, J.R., 1995a. Inter- and intra-beach thermal variation for green turtle nests on Ascension Island, South Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 75, 405–411.Google Scholar
Hays, G.C., Mackay, A., Adams, C.R., Mortimer, J.A., Speakman, J.R. & Boerema, M., 1995b. Nest site selection by sea turtles. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 75, 667–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, G.C. & Speakman, J.R., 1993. Nest placement by loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta. Animal Behaviour, 45, 47–53.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, J.R. & Balsingham, E., 1966. Nesting beach preferences of Malayan sea turtles. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum of Singapore, 33, 69–76.Google Scholar
Henschel, J.R., Ward, D. & Lubin, Y., 1992. The importance of thermal factors for nest site selection, web construction and behaviour of Stegodyphus lineatus (Araneae, Eresidae) in the Negev Desert. Journal of Thermal Biology, 17, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillel, D., 1971. Soil and water. Physical principles and processes. London: Academic Press. [Physiological Ecology. A series of monographs texts and treatises.]Google Scholar
Horrocks, J.A. & Scott, N.McA., 1991. Nest site location and nest success in the hawksbill turtle Eretomochelys imbricata in Barbados, West Indies. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 69, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D.C. & Prange, H.D., 1979. Ventilation and gas exchange during rest and exercise in adult green sea turtles. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 134B, 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, F.J., 1994a. Vegetational cover predicts sex ratio of hatchling turtles in natural nests. Ecology, 75, 1593–1599.Google Scholar
Janzen, F.J., 1994b. Climate change and temperature dependent sex determination in reptiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 91, 7487–7490.Google Scholar
Janzen, F.J. & Paukstis, G.L., 1991. Environmental sex determination in reptiles: ecology, evolution, and experimental design. Quarterly Review of Biology, 66, 149–179.Google Scholar
Jeffers, J.N.R., 1978. An introduction to systems analysis: with ecological applications. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Jolliffe, I.T., 1986. Principal component analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Buff, C.R. Jr , 1990. The loggerhead turtle in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Sanibel, Florida: Caretta Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Leshem, A., Ar, A. & Ackerman, R.A., 1991. Growth, water and energy metabolism of the soft shelled turtle (Trinyx triunguis) embryo effects of temperature. Physiological Zoology, 64, 568–594.Google Scholar
Limpus, C.J., Reed, P. & Miller, J.D., 1983. Islands and turtles. The influence of choice of nesting beach on sex ratio. In Proceedings of the Inaugural Great Barrier Reef Conference (ed. J.T., Baker et al.), pp. 397–402. Townsville, Australia: James Cook University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J.D., 1985. Embryology of sea turtles. In Biology of the Reptilia, vol. 14 (ed. C., Gans et al.), pp. 269–328. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mortimer, J.A., 1982. Factors influencing beach selection by nesting sea turtles. In Biology and conservation of sea turtles (ed. K.A., Bjorndal), pp. 45–51. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Insitution Press.Google Scholar
Mortimer, J.A., 1990. The influence of beach sand characteristics on the nesting behavior and clutch survival of green turtles (Chelonia mydas). Copeia, 1990, 802–817.Google Scholar
Mortimer, J.A. & Portier, K.M., 1989. Reproductive homing and inter-nesting behaviour of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) at Ascension Island, South Atlantic Ocean. Copeia, 1989, 962–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrosovsky, N., 1983. Ecology and nest-site selection of leatherback turtles Dermochelys coriacea. Biological Conservation, 26, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrosovsky, N., 1988. Pivotal temperatures for loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) from northern and southern nesting beaches. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66, 661–669.Google Scholar
Mrosovsky, N., Dutton, P.H. & Whitmore, C.P., 1984. Sex ratios of two species of sea turtle nesting in Suriname. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 62, 2227–2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrosovsky, N., Lavin, C. & Godfrey, M.H., 1995. Thermal effects of condominiums on a turtle beach in Florida. Biological Conservation, 74, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrosovsky, N. & Provancha, J., 1989. Sex ratio of loggerhead sea turtles hatching on a Florida beach. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67, 2533–2539.Google Scholar
Mrosovsky, N. & Provancha, J., 1992. Sex ratio of hatchling loggerhead turtles: data and estimates from a 5-year study. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 70, 530–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrosovsky, N. & Yntema, C.L., 1980. Temperature dependence in sexual differentiation in sea turtles: implications for conservation practices. Biological Conservation, 18, 271–280.Google Scholar
Penn, D. & Brockmann, H.J., 1994. Nest site selection in the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphenus. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 187, 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, D.H. & Richmond, M.E., 1985. The influence of soil texture, moisture and temperature on nest site selection and burrowing by the pine vole, Microtus pinetorum. American Midland Naturalist, 113, 102–108.Google Scholar
Roosenberg, W.M., 1996. Maternal condition and nest site choice an alternative for the maintenance of environmental sex determination. American Zoologist, 36, 157–168.Google Scholar
Sapsford, C.W. & Hughes, G.R., 1978. Body temperature of the loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta and the leatherback sea turtle Dermochelys coriacea during nesting. Zoologica Africana, 13, 63–69.Google Scholar
Schmidt Nielsen, K., 1973. Animal physiology. Adaptation and environment. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schwartzkopf, L. & Brooks, R.J., 1987. Nest site selection and offspring sex ratio in painted turtles Chrysemys picta. Copeia, 1987, 53–61.Google Scholar
Seely, M.K., Roberts, C.S. & Mitchell, D., 1988. High Body Temperatures Of Namib Dune Tenebrionids - Why? Journal of Arid Environments, 14, 135–143.Google Scholar
Shine, R. & Harlow, P.S., 1996. Maternal manipulation of offspring phenotypes via nest site selection in an oviparous lizard. Ecology, 77, 1808–1817.Google Scholar
Souza, R.R. de & Vogt, R.C., 1994. Incubation temperature influences sex and hatchling size in the neotropical turtle Podocnemis unifilis. Journal of Herpetology, 28, 453–464.Google Scholar
Spotilla, J.R., Standora, E.A., Morreale, S.J. & Ruiz, G.J., 1987. Temperature dependent sex determination in the sea turtle (Chelonia mydas): effects on the sex ratio on a natural nesting beach. Herpetologica, 43, 74–81.Google Scholar
Stancyk, S.E. & Ross, J.P., 1978. An analysis of sand from green turtle nesting beaches on Ascension Island. Copeia, 1978, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standora, E.A. & Spotila, J.R., 1985. Temperature dependent sex determination in sea turtles. Copeia, 1985, 711–722.Google Scholar
Stoneburner, D.L. & Richardson, J.I., 1981. Observations on the role of temperature in loggerhead turtle nest site selection. Copeia, 1981, 238–241.Google Scholar
VriesD.A., de D.A., de, 1995. Heat transfer in soils. In Heat and mass transfer in the biosphere. I. Transfer processes in the plant environment (ed. D.A., de Vries and D.H., Atgan). Amsterdam: Halstead Press.Google Scholar
Wachob, D.G., 1996. A microclimate analysis of nest site selection by mountain chickadees. Journal of Field Ornithology, 67, 525–533.Google Scholar
Walsberg, G.E., 1981. Nest site selection and the radiative environment of the warbling vireo. Condor, 83, 86–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, C.P. & Dutton, P.H., 1985. Infertility, embryonic mortality and nest-site selection in leatherback and green turtles in Suriname. Biological Conservation, 34, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
With, K.A. & Webb, D.R., 1993. Microclimate of ground nests - the relative importance of radiative cover and wind breaks for 3 grassland species. Condor, 95, 401–413.Google Scholar
Yntema, C.L. & Mrosovsky, N., 1982. Critical periods and pivotal temperatures for sexual differentiation in loggerhead sea turtles. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 60, 1012–1016.Google Scholar