No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Terrigenous leaf-utilizing life of the tube-bearing annelid Anchinothria cirrobranchiata (Annelida: Onuphidae) in the deep sea
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 November 2022
Abstract
Deep-sea ecosystems are generally oligotrophic because they lack photosynthesizing producers. On deep-sea slopes near land, however, various terrestrial plant remains flow to and are deposited on near-shore deep bottoms. From a depth of 300 m off the Pacific coast of Owase, central Japan, we collected an onuphid polychaete, Anchinothria cirrobranchiata (Annelida: Onuphidae), which lives in a dorsoventrally flattened portable tube. The polychaete tubes were made of sand, as well as leaves and twigs of terrestrial evergreen trees. The leaves glued on the portable tubes were chartaceous, blackish and tough; they belonged mainly to two genera of Fagaceae, Castanopsis and Quercus, which are dominant components of coastal evergreen oak forests. In aquaria, the polychaetes fed on the leaves on their tubes, as well as autochthonous sedimented leaves, suggesting utilization of terrigenous plant litter as food. As to the evolution of Anchinothria, a molecular phylogenetic analysis suggests that Anchinothria is monophyletic with other Hyalinoeciinae (Nothria, Leptoecia, Hyalinoecia).
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 102 , Issue 7 , November 2022 , pp. 496 - 501
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
References
Budaeva, N, Pyataeva, S and Meissner, K (2014) Development of the deep-sea viviparous quill worm Leptoecia vivipara (Hyalinoeciinae, Onuphidae, Annelida). Invertebrate Biology 133, 242–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budaeva, N, Schepetov, D, Zanol, J, Neretina, T and Willassen, E (2016) When molecules support morphology: phylogenetic reconstruction of the family Onuphidae (Eunicida, Annelida) based on 16S rDNA and 18S rDNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 94, 791–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castresana, J (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17, 540–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edgar, RC (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elwood, H, Olsen, GJ and Sogin, M (1985) The small-subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences from the hypotrichous ciliates Oxytricha nova and Stylonychia pustulata. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2, 399–410.Google ScholarPubMed
Fauchald, K (1982) Revision of Onuphis, Nothria, and Paradiopatra (Polychaeta: Onuphidae) based upon type material. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Galtier, N, Gouy, M and Gautier, C (1996) SEAVIEW and PHYLO_WIN: two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12, 543–548.Google ScholarPubMed
Giangrande, A (1997) Polychaete reproductive patterns, life cycles and life histories: an overview. Oceanography and Marine Biology 35, 323–386.Google Scholar
Gouy, M, Guindon, S and Gascuel, O (2010) SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27, 221–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, G, Kelly, P, Pautard, F and Wilson, R (1965) Onuphic acid – a sugar phosphate polymer from the tube of Hyalinoecia tubicola. Nature 206, 1256–1257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, DM, Ammerman, LK, Dixon, MT and de Sá, RO (1993) Ribosomal DNA and the phylogeny of frogs. Herpetological Monographs 7, 118–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imajima, M (1999) Onuphidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) from Japan, excluding the genus Onuphis. National Science Museum Monographs 16, 1–115.Google Scholar
Menzies, RJ and Rowe, GT (1969) The distribution and significance of detrital turtle grass, Thallassia testudinata, on the deep-sea floor off North Carolina. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 54, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzies, RJ, Zaneveld, JS and Pratt, RM (1967) Transported turtle grass as a source of organic enrichment of abyssal sediments off North Carolina. Proceedings of the Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 111–IN117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, KS, Wagner, JKS, Ball, B, Turner, PJ, Young, CM and Van Dover, CL (2016) Hyalinoecia artifex: field notes on a charismatic and abundant epifaunal polychaete on the US Atlantic continental margin. Invertebrate Biology 135, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbi, S, Martin, A, Romano, S, McMillan, W, Stice, L and Grabowski, G (1991) The Simple Fool's Guide to PCR. Version 2. University of Hawaii, Zoology Department, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
Paxton, H (1986) Generic revision and relationships of the family Onuphidae (Annelida: Polychaeta). Records of the Australian Museum 38, 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, H (1998) The Diopatra chiliensis confusion – redescription of D-chiliensis (Polychaeta, Onuphidae) and implicated species. Zoologica Scripta 27, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronquist, F and Huelsenbeck, JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silvestro, D and Michalak, I (2012) raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 12, 335–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, KR (2012) Decomposition of materials in the sea. In Jones EBG and Pang K-L (eds), Marine Fungi and Fungal-Like Organisms, Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, pp. 475–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamatakis, A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688–2690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struck, T, Hessling, R and Purschke, G (2002) The phylogenetic position of the Aeolosomatidae and Parergodrilidae, two enigmatic oligochaete-like taxa of the ‘Polychaeta’, based on molecular data from 18S rDNA sequences. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 40, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchanek, TH, Williams, SL, Ogden, JC, Hubbard, DK and Gill, IP (1985) Utilization of shallow-water seagrass detritus by Carribbean deep-sea macrofauna: δ13C evidence. Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers 32, 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talavera, G and Castresana, J (2007) Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Systematic Biology 56, 564–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanabe, AS (2011) Kakusan4 and Aminosan: two programs for comparing nonpartitioned, proportional and separate models for combined molecular phylogenetic analyses of multilocus sequence data. Molecular Ecology Resources 11, 914–921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, JA, Frandsen, PB, Prendini, E, Zhou, X and Holzenthal, RW (2020) A multigene phylogeny and timeline for Trichoptera (Insecta). Systematic Entomology 45, 670–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiebe, PH, Madin, LP, Haury, LR, Harbison, GR and Philbin, LM (1979) Diel vertical migration by Salpa aspera and its potential for large-scale particulate organic matter transport to the deep-sea. Marine Biology 53, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, T (1979) Magrofaunal utilization of plant remains in the deep sea. Sarsia 64, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, W, Pang, K-L and Luo, Z-H (2014) High fungal diversity and abundance recovered in the deep-sea sediments of the Pacific Ocean. Microbial Ecology 68, 688–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamamori et al. supplementary material
Yamamori et al. supplementary material
File
15.2 KB