Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:55:48.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomic revision of Brazilian Tethya (Porifera: Hadromerida) with description of four new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Suzi M. Ribeiro  and
Guilherme Muricy
Suzi M. Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia de Porifera, Departamento de Invertebrados, Museu Nacional—Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, s/nº, São Cristóvão, CEP 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Guilherme Muricy*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia de Porifera, Departamento de Invertebrados, Museu Nacional—Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, s/nº, São Cristóvão, CEP 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: G. Muricy, Laboratório de Biologia de Porifera, Departamento de Invertebrados, Museu Nacional—Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, s/nº, São Cristóvão, CEP 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The taxonomy of the genus Tethya from Brazil is revised. Five species are described, four of which are new to science: Tethya maza, T. beatrizae sp. nov., T. nicoleae sp. nov., T. parvula sp. nov., and T. solangeae sp. nov. Five earlier records of Tethya from Brazil (T. aurantium, T. diploderma, T. maza, T. japonica and T. seychellensis) are re-evaluated and only T. maza is confirmed. The other previous records of Tethya from Brazil, viz., Tethya brasiliana, T. cyanae, T. ignis and T. rubra, have been recently described in detail using scanning electron microscopy and are also considered valid. An amendment to the nomenclature of micrasters is made, recognizing at least two different morphologies of each type of micraster (strongylasters types 1 and 2, tylasters types 1 and 2, and oxyasters types 1, 2 and 3). A neotype was designated for T. maza. With four new species described here and four previous records considered invalid the known diversity of Tethya in Brazil still remains nine species. However, its rate of endemism has increased from 44% to 89%.

Keywords

DemospongiaeTethyanew speciessouth-western AtlanticBrazil
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 91 , Issue 7 , November 2011 , pp. 1511 - 1528
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baer, L. (1906) Silicospongien von Sansibar, Kapstadt and Papeete (inaugural dissertation: Berlin). Archiv für Naturgeschichte 72, 1–32.Google Scholar
Bergquist, P. and Kelly-Borges, M. (1991) An evaluation of the genus Tethya (Porifera: Demospongiae: Hadromerida) with descriptions of new species from the Southwest Pacific. The Beagle, Records of the Northeastern Territory Museum of Arts and Sciences 8, 37–72.Google Scholar
Boury-Esnault, N. (1973) Campagne de la ‘Calypso’ au large des côtes atlantiques de l'Amérique du Sud (1961–1962) I. 29. Spongiaires. Résultats Scientifiques des Campagnes de la ‘Calypso’ V (Supplement), 263–295.Google Scholar
Boury-Esnault, N. and Rützler, K. (eds) (1997) Thesaurus of sponge morphology. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 596, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, M. (1924) A revision of the sponge family Donatiidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 4, 1033–1046.Google Scholar
Burton, M. (1930) Norwegian sponges from the Norman collection. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1930, 487–546.Google Scholar
Burton, M. (1948) Marine sponges of Congo coast. Institut Royal Colonial Belge Bulletin des Séances 19, 753–758.Google Scholar
Carter, H.J. (1890) Porifera. Journal of the Linnean Society, Zoology 20, 473–570.Google Scholar
Corriero, G., Balduzzi, A. and Sarà, M. (1989) Ecological differences in the distribution of two Tethya (Porifera, Demospongiae) species coexisting in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon. PSZNI Marine Ecology 10, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenauer, E. (1915) Die Knospenentwicklung von Donatia ingalli und Donatia maza. Die feineren Bauverhältnisse bei der Knospenentwicklung der Donatien. Zoologischer Anzeiger, Band 45, 151–164.Google Scholar
Fishelson, L. (1981) Observations on the moving colonies of the genus Tethya (Demospongiae, Porifera): 1. Behavior and cytology. Zoomorphology 98, 89–100.Google Scholar
Gaino, E. and Sarà, M. (1994) Siliceous spicules of Tethya seychellensis (Porifera) support the growth of a green alga: a possible light conducting system. Marine Ecology Progress Series 108, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J.E. (1848) List of the specimens of British sponges in the collection of the British Museum (London). British Museum Publication 8, 1–24.Google Scholar
Gray, J.E. (1867) Observations on sponges and on their arrangement and nomenclature. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 1, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hechtel, G.J. (1965) A systematic study of the Demospongiae of Port Royal, Jamaica. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University Bulletin 20, 1–103.Google Scholar
Hechtel, G.J. (1976) Zoogeography of Brazilian marine Demospongiae. In Harrison, F.W. and Cowden, R.R. (eds) Aspects of sponge biology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, I., Nickel, M., Picton, B. and Brümmer, F. (2007) Description and molecular phylogeny of Tethya hibernica sp. nov. (Porifera, Demospongiae) from Northern Ireland with remarks on the European species of the genus Tethya. Zootaxa 1595, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J.N.A. and Wiedenmayer, F. (1994) Porifera. In Wells, A. (ed.) Zoological catalogue of Australia. Melbourne: CSIRO Australia, pp. 1–620.Google Scholar
ICZN (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature) (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. 4th edition. London: The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature.Google Scholar
Indap, M.M. and Pathare, S.P. (1998) Cytotoxicity and bioactivity of some marine animals. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences 27, 433–437.Google Scholar
Klautau, M., Russo, C.A.M., Lazoski, C., Boury-Esnault, N., Thorpe, J.P. and Solé-Cava, A.M. (1999) Does cosmopolitanism result from overconservative systematics? A case study using the marine sponge Chondrilla nucula. Evolution 53, 1414–1422.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.B.P.A. de M. (1814) Suíte des polypiers empâtés. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris 1, 69–80.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, M.W. (1934) New sponges from the Puerto Rican deep. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 91, 1–28.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, M.W. (1936) A discussion of the sponge fauna of the Dry Tortugas in particular and the West Indies in general, with material for a revision of the families and orders of the Porifera. Papers from Tortugas Laboratory 30, 1–225.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, M.W. (1953) Sponges of the Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean 2, 511–557.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, M.W. (1956) Preliminary discussion of the sponges of Brazil. Contribuições Avulsas do Instituto Oceanográfico da Universidade de São Paulo, Série Oceanografia Biológica 1, 1–4.Google Scholar
Lehnert, H. and van Soest, R.W.M. (1998) Shallow water sponges of Jamaica. Beaufortia 48, 71–103.Google Scholar
Lendenfeld, R. von (1888) Descriptive catalogue of the sponges in the Australian Museum, Sidney. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Mothes-de-Moraes, B. (1980) Esponjas de São Sebastião, litoral de São Paulo, Brasil (Porifera, Demospongiae). Iheringia, Série Zoologia 56, 75–86.Google Scholar
Mothes-de-Moraes, B. (1987) Ocorrência de poríferos na zona de maré da Ilha João da Cunha, Porto Belo, Santa Catarina, Brasil (Porifera, Demospongiae) I. Iheringia, Série Zoologia 66, 129–139.Google Scholar
Mothes, B. and Bastian, M.C.K. de A. (1993) Esponjas do Arquipélago de Fernando de Noronha, Brasil (Porifera, Demospongiae). Iheringia, Série Zoologia 75, 15–31.Google Scholar
Nardo, G.D. (1833) Auszug aus einem neuen System der Spongiarien, wonach bereits die Aufstellung in der Universitats-Sammlung zu Pádua gemacht ist. In Isis, oder Encyclopadische Zeitung Coll. Jena: Oken, pp. 519–523.Google Scholar
Nickel, M. (2006) Like a ‘rolling stone’: quantitative analysis of the body movement and skeletal dynamics of the sponge Tethya wilhelma. Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2839–2846.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, B.R. (2001) Biologically active proteins from natural product extracts. Journal of Natural Products 64, 1373–1381.Google Scholar
Pallas, P.S. (1766) Elenchus Zoophytorum sistens generum adumbrations generaliores et specierum cognitarum succinctas descriptiones cum selectis auctorum synonymis. The Hague: Petrum van Cleef, pp. 1–451.Google Scholar
Pulitzer-Finali, G. (1982) Some shallow-water sponges from Hong Kong. In Morton, B.S. and Tseng, C.K. (eds) The Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China (Proceedings of the First International Marine Biology Workshop). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 97–110.Google Scholar
Pulitzer-Finali, G. (1986) A collection of West Indian Demospongiae (Porifera). In appendix, a list of the Demospongiae hitherto recorded from the Mediterranean Sea. Annali del Museo civico di storia naturale Giacomo Doria 86, 65–216.Google Scholar
Reiswig, H.M. (1971) In situ pumping activities of tropical Demospongiae. Marine Biology 9, 38–50.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, S.M. and Muricy, G. (2004) Four new sympatric species of Tethya (Demospongiae: Hadromerida) from Abrolhos Archipelago (Bahia State, Brazil). Zootaxa 557, 1–16.Google Scholar
Rützler, K. (1978) Results of the Austrian–Indian Hydrobiological Mission 1976 to the Andaman Islands—Part II. Report on a freshwater sponge (Porifera: Spongillidae) from the Andaman Islands. Aquatic Biology 3, 143–145.Google Scholar
Samaai, T. and Gibbons, M.J. (2005) Demospongiae taxonomy and biodiversity of the Benguela region on the west coast of South Africa. African Natural History 1, 1–96.Google Scholar
Sarà, M. (1987) A study on the genus Tethya (Porifera Demospongiae) and new perspectives in sponge systematics. In Vacelet, J. and Boury-Esnault, N. (eds) Taxonomy of Porifera. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 207–225.Google Scholar
Sarà, M. (1994) A rearrangement of the family Tethyidae (Porifera, Hadromerida) with establishment of new genera and description of two new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 110, 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarà, M. (2002) Family Tethyidae Gray 1867. In Hooper, J.N.A. and van Soest, R.W.M. (eds) Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 246–272.Google Scholar
Sarà, M. and Bavestrello, G. (1998) Two new species of Tethya (Porifera, Demospongiae) from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands. Italian Journal of Zoology 65, 371–376.Google Scholar
Sarà, M. and Burlando, B. (1994) Phylogenetic reconstruction and evolutionary hypotheses in the family Tethyidae (Demospongiae). In van Soest, R.W.M., van Kempen, Th.M.G. and Braekman, J.C. (eds) Sponges in time and space. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, pp. 111–116.Google Scholar
Sarà, M. and Corriero, G. (1994) A new species of Tethya, Tethya tenuisclera (Porifera, Demospongiae) from the Maldives. Bollettino dei Musei e degli Istituti Biologici dell'Università di Genova 58–59, 69–75.Google Scholar
Sarà, M. and Sarà, A. (2004) A revision of Australian and New Zealand Tethya (Porifera: Demospongiae) with preliminary analysis of species-groupings. Invertebrate Systematics 18, 117–156.Google Scholar
Sarà, M., Bavestrello, G. and Calcinai, B. (2000) New Tethya species (Porifera, Demospongiae) from the Pacific area. Zoosystema 22, 345–353.Google Scholar
Sarà, M., Sarà, A., Nickel, M. and Brümmer, F. (2001) Three new species of Tethya (Porifera: Demospongiae) from German aquaria. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde (A, Biologie) 631, 1–15.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. (1870) Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des Atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Selenka, E. (1879) Ueber einen Kieselschwamm von achtstrah ligem Bau, und über Entwicklung der Schwammknospen. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Zoologie 33, 467–476.Google Scholar
Shim, E.J. and Sim, C.J. (2008) Two sponges of Family Tethyidae (Demospongiae: Hadromerida) from Korea. Animal Cells and Systems 12, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, A.C., Kratz, J.M., Farias, F.M., Henriques, A.T., Santos, J., Leonel, R.M., Lerner, C., Mothes, B., Barardi, C.R.M. and Simões, C.M.O. (2006) In vitro antiviral activity of marine sponges collected off Brazilian coast. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 29, 135–140.Google Scholar
van Soest, R.W.M. and Beglinger, E.J. (2008) Tetractinellid and hadromerid sponges of the Sultanate of Oman. Zoologische Mededelingen 82, 749–790.Google Scholar
van Soest, R.W.M., Boury-Esnault, N., Hooper, J.N.A., Rützler, K, de Voogd, N.J., Alvarez, B., Hajdu, E., Pisera, A.B., Vacelet, J., Manconi, R., Schönberg, C., Janussen, D., Tabachnick, K.R. and Klautau, M. (2010) World Porifera database. Available online at http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera (accessed 1 May 2010).Google Scholar
Sollas, I.B.J. (1902) On the sponges collected during the ‘Skeat’ Expedition to the Malay Peninsula. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 2, 210–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollas, W.J. (1885) A classification of the sponges. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 16, 1–395.Google Scholar
Sollas, W.J. (1888) Report on the Tetractinellida collected by H.M.S. Challenger, during the years 1873–1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, 1873–1876. Zoology 25, 1–458.Google Scholar
Stone, S.M. (1986) Index to important sponge collections. 2nd edition. Available on www.habitas.org.uk/marinelife/sponge_guide/collections (accessed 15 January 2009).Google Scholar
Thiele, J. (1898) Studien über pazifische Spongien. I. Japanische Demospongien. Zoologica. Original-Abhandlugen aus dem Geesamtgebiete der Zoologie. Stuttgart 24, 1–33.Google Scholar
Thomas, P.A. (1973) Marine Demospongiae of Mahe Island in the Seychelles Bank (Indian Ocean). Annales du Musée Royal de l'Afrique Central, Série 8, Sciences Zoologiques 203, 1–96.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1894) Une réforme dans la classification des Halichondrina. Mémoires de la Société Zoologique de France 7, 27–36.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1918) Éponges de San Thomé. Essai sur le genres Spirastrella, Donatia et Chondrilla. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale 57, 535–618.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1920) Tethya aurantium (Pallas) et les Tethya de Lamarck. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle 26, 640–646.Google Scholar
Wright, E.P. (1881) On a new genus and species of sponge (Alemo seychellensis) with supposed heteromorphic zooids. Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 28, 13–20.Google Scholar