Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T00:36:41.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomic confusion in the genus Pontocrates (Crustacea: Amphipoda) and the presence of P. arcticus in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. G. Moore  and
D. J. Beare
P. G. Moore
Affiliation:
University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland, KA28 0EG
D. J. Beare
Affiliation:
University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland, KA28 0EG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Notice is given of the presence of a previously un-reported oedicerotid amphipod species, Pontocra tes arcticus Sars, in the shallow sublittoral zone of the sandy beach at Kames Bay, Millport (Scotland). Distinguishing features from P. arenarius are the parallel-sided second coxal plates, strongly deflexed narrow rostrum and lack of sternal dark pigmentation patterns in both sexes. A key to the three species in the genus is provided.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , August 1993 , pp. 609 - 615
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bate, C. S., 1858. Description of two rare crustaceans from the coast of Durham, one of them a new species. Transactions of the Tyneside Naturalists' Field Club, 4, 15–16.Google Scholar
Bate, C. S. & Westwood, J. O., 1862. A history of the British sessile-eyed Crustacea. Vol. 1, parts 4–10, pp. 145–480. London: John Van Voorst.Google Scholar
Boeck, A., 1871. Crustacea Amphipoda borealia et arctica. Forhandlinger i Videnskabsselskabet i Kristiania, 1870, 83–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevreux, E. & Fage, L., 1925. Amphipodes. Faune de France, 9, 1–488.Google Scholar
Clark, R. B. & Milne, A., 1955. The sublittoral fauna of two sandy bays on the Isle of Cumbrae, Firth of Clyde. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 34, 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. & Segrove, F., 1955a. The fauna living in Stoupe Beck Sands, Robin Hood's Bay (Yorkshire, North Riding). Journal of Animal Ecology, 24, 426–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. & Segrove, F., 1955b. The tidal plankton over Stoupe Beck Sands, Robin Hood's Bay (Yorkshire, North Riding). Journal of Animal Ecology, 24, 445–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, A. A., 1969. Amphipods of the shallow-water sand community in the northern Irish Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 1003–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, A. A., 1970. Amphipods in the surf plankton. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P. J. & Ryland, J. S., 1990. The marine fauna of the British Isles and north-west Europe. Vol. 1. Introduction and protozoans to arthropods. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lincoln, R. J., 1979. British marine Amphipoda: Gammaridea. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Moore, P. G., 1984. The fauna of the Clyde Sea area. Crustacea: Amphipoda. Occasional Publications. University Marine Biological Station, Millport, no. 2, 84 pp.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1893. An account of the Crustacea of Norway, with short descriptions and figures of all the species. Vol. 1, parts 10–15, pp. 213–340, Amphipoda. (1890–1895). Christiania: Cammermeyer.Google Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1941. Observations on the night tidal migrant Crustacea of Kames Bay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 25, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1942. The macrofauna of the intertidal sand of Kames Bay, Millport, Buteshire. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 60, 543–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar