Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T13:50:25.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of the Spring Diatom Increase in Loch Striven

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

S. M. Marshall  and
A. P. Orr
S. M. Marshall
Affiliation:
Assistant Naturalist
A. P. Orr
Affiliation:
Chemist, Marine Station, Millport.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The spring diatom increase in the open sea and probably also in inshore waters is one of the most important annual biological events and information regarding it or its causes is likely to be of value. In an inshore area changes are not only more pronounced, but also take place more rapidly than in the open sea and, for this reason among others, the increase was studied in Loch Striven, a well-sheltered loch in the Clyde Sea Area. A general description of the weekly changes occurring in this loch has already been made (Marshall and. Orr, 1927). The changes during the spring, however, are so rapid that an examination at even closer intervals during this period was thought advisable. Such an examination was made in 1927 and 1928, the interval between successive visits being generally two days. The methods used were the same as those described in the above-mentioned paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , May 1930 , pp. 853 - 878
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1926. Atkins, W. R. G. A quantitative consideration of some factors concerned in plant growth in water. Part 2. Some chemical factors. Journal du Conseil, Vol. I, No. 3.Google Scholar
1927 (a). Atkins, W. R. G. Seasonal changes in the Silica Content of Natural Waters in Relation to the Phytoplankton. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XIV.Google Scholar
1927 (6). Atkins, W. R. G.The Phosphate Content of Sea-Water in Relation to the Growth of the Algal Plankton. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIV.Google Scholar
1928. Atkins, W. R. G.Seasonal variations in the phosphate and silicate content of sea-water during 1926 and 1927 in relation to the phytoplankton. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XV, No. 1.Google Scholar
1924. Bigelow, H. B. Plankton of the Offshore waters of the Gulf of Maine. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries, Vol. XL, Part 2.Google Scholar
1929. Föyn, Birgithe Ruud. Investigations of the Phytoplankton at Lofoten, March–April, 1922–1927. Skrifter utgitt av Det Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo. I. Matem.-Naturv. Klasse, 1928, No. 10.Google Scholar
1928. Föyn, B., and Gran, H. H. Über Oxydation von organischen Stoffen im Meerwasser durch Bacterien. Avhandlinger utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo. I. Matem.-Naturv. Klasse, No. 3.Google Scholar
1927. Gaarder, T., and Gran, H. H. Investigations of the Production of Plankton in the Oslofjord. Rapports et Procès-verbaux des Réunions, Vol. XLII.Google Scholar
1927. Gran, H. H.The Production of Plankton in coastal waters off Bergen, March–April, 1922. Report on Norwegian Fishery and Marine Investigations, Vol. III, No. 8Google Scholar
1929. Gran, H. H.Investigation of the Production of Plankton outside the Romsdal-fjord, 1926–1927. Rapports et Procès-verbaux des Reunions, Vol. LVI.Google Scholar
1918. Gran, H. H., and Gaarder, T. Üer die Einfluss des atmo-sphärischen veränderangen Nordeuropas auf die hydrograph-ischen Verhältnisse des Kristianiafjord bei Dröbak im Marz, 1916. Publications de Circonstance, No. 71.Google Scholar
1926. Gran, H. H., and Ruud, B. Untersuchungen uber die im Meer-wasser gelösten organischen Stoffe und ihr Verhältnis zur Planktonproduktion. Avhandlinger utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo. I. Matem.Naturv. Klasse, No. 6. 1907.Google Scholar
1907. Karsten, G. Das Indische Phytoplankton nach dem Material der deutschen Tiefsee Expedition,. 1898–99. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der deutschen Tiefsee Expedition, Zweiter Band, Zweiter Teil.Google Scholar
1927. Marshall, S. M., and Orr, A. P.The Relation of the Plankton to some Chemical and Physical Factors in the Clyde Sea Area. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, N.S., Vol. XIII, No. 4.Google Scholar
1928. Marshall, S. M., and Orr, A. P.The Photosynthesis of Diatom Cultures in the Sea. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, N.S., Vol. XV, No. 1.Google Scholar
1888. Murray, John. On the effects of winds on the distribution of temperature in the sea- and fresh-water lochs of the West of Scotland. Scottish Geographical Magazine.Google Scholar
1929. Poole, H. H., and Atkins, W. R. G.Photoelectric measurements of submarine illumination throughout the year. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, N.S., Vol. XVI, No. 1.Google Scholar
1924. Pütter, August. Der Umfang der Kohlensäurereduktion durch die Planktonalgen. Pflügers Archiv. fur die gesamte Physiologie, Bd. 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1904. Ruppin, E. Ueber die Oxydierbarkeit des Meereswasser durch Kaliumpermanganat. Publications de Circonstance, No. 20.Google Scholar