Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:37:03.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of the Diatoms of the Ouse Estuary, Sussex III. The Seasonal Variation in the Littoral Epiphyte Flora and the Shore Plankton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. T. Hopkins
J. T. Hopkins
Affiliation:
2 Valley Road, Newhaven, Sussex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Analyses have been made of some of the constituents of the coastal sea water and the river water, and the results have been correlated with the growth phases of some planktonic diatom species and littoral epiphytes, although for most species the sea-water temperature and light intensity were limiting factors.

The factor determining the death of an epiphytic diatom community in the littoral zone has been considered to be the air temperature in conjunction with desiccation and a summary of the limiting temperatures for each of the four substrata is given in Table 7. Table 10 is a summary of all the distribution and temperature records. The heat itself is not lethal in many cases but the desiccation of the epiphyte in the littoral zone is accelerated at higher temperatures. Diatoms in damp situations were found to occur at temperatures which in a dry site were limiting, and further work indicating the relationship between relative humidity and lethal temperatures is needed.

The ability of a diatom to survive depends upon the water-retaining ability of the substratum. Chalk and large algae favoured the growth of most solitary epiphytes, and filamentous epiphytes grew particularly well on algae except the filamentous Navicula, which were best suited by chalk. The Achnanthes blue-green community was most frequent on wood. Concrete makes a firm substratum and allows rapid growth in winter but it is easily dried and most diatoms on it are destroyed in the summer.

Four diatom genera (Fragilaria, Grammatophora, Biddulphia and Melosira) are able to exist in the epiphyte flora and the shore plankton and the term facultative epiphyte is suggested to describe the behaviour of at least some of the species of these genera.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , October 1964 , pp. 613 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aleem, A. A., 1949. A quantitative method for estimating the periodicity of diatoms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 713–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aleem, A. A., 1950a. Distribution and ecology of British marine littoral diatoms. J. Ecol., Vol. 38, pp. 75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aleem, A. A., 1950b. The diatoms community inhabiting the mud-flats at Whitstable. New Phytol., Vol. 49, pp. 174–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, W. E., 1925. Statistical studies of surface catches of marine diatoms and dinoflagellates, etc. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc., Vol. 44, pp. 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, W. R. G. & Wilson, E. G., 1926. The colorimetric estimation of minute amounts of silicon, of phosphorus and of arsenic. Biochem. J., Vol. 20, pp. 1223–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boalch, G. T., 1957. Marine algal zonation and substratum in Beer Bay, south-east Devon. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 519–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castenholz, R. W., 1963. An experimental study of the vertical distribution of littoral marine diatoms. Limnol. Oceanogr., No. 4, pp. 450–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritsch, F. E., 1945. Structure and Reproduction of the Algae. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geitler, L., 1932. Cyanophyceae. In Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora, Bd. 14. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ghazzauri, F. M., 1933. The littoral diatoms of the Liverpool and Port Erin shores. J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K., Vol. 19, pp. 165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendey, N. I., 1951. The littoral diatoms of Chichester harbour with special reference to fouling. J. R. micr. Soc., Vol. 71, pp. 1–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendey, N. I., 1954. A preliminary check list of British marine diatoms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33, pp. 537–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, J. T., 1963. A study of the diatoms of the Ouse estuary, Sussex. I. The movement of the mud-flat diatoms in response to some chemical and physical changes. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 653–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, J. T., 1964. A study of the diatoms of the Ouse estuary, Sussex. II. An ecological study of the composition of the mud-fiat diatom flora. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 333–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hustedt, F., 1930. Kieselalgen. In Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora, Bd. 7. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hustedt, F., 1939. Die Diatomeenflora des Küstengebietes der Nordsee vom Dollart bis zur Elbemündung. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen, Bd. 31, pp. 572–677.Google Scholar
Hustedt, F., 1955. Marine littoral diatoms of Beaufort, North Carolina. Duke University mar. St. Bull., No. 6, pp. 5–67.Google Scholar
Hustedt, F. & Aleem, A. A., 1951. Littoral diatoms from the Salstone near Plymouth. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 30, pp. 177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, J. M., 1962. The effect of waves on the composition of a population of attached marine algae. Bull. Torrey bot. Cl., No. 89, pp. 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1929. The Planktonic Diatoms of Northern Seas. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Lund, J. W. G., 1951. A sedimentation technique for counting algae and other organisms. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 3, pp. 390–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marumo, R., 1954. Plankton in the neighbourhood of the Ocean Weather Station T. in S. Kuroshio water. [In Japanese. From Dr Parkes's collection.]Google Scholar
McLean, R. C. & Ivemy Cook, W. R., 1953. Practical Field Ecology. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Newton, L., 1931. A Handbook of British Seaweeds. London: British Museum (Nat. Hist.).Google Scholar
Parke, M., 1953. A preliminary check-list of British Marine Algae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, C. B., 1940. A preliminary study of the ecology of a mud-flat. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Round, F. E., 1960. The diatom flora of a salt marsh on the River Dee. New Phytol., Vol. 59, pp. 332–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland Taylor, W. & Palmer, J. D., 1963. The relationship between light and photosynthesis in intertidal benthic diatoms. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 125, p. 395Google Scholar
Smith, W., 1853, 1856. A Synopsis of the British Diatomaceae. Vols.I, II. London.Google Scholar
Southward, A. J. & Orton, J. H., 1954. The effect of wave action on the distribution and numbers of the commoner plants and animals living on the Plymouth breakwater. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansley, A. G., 1953. The British Islands and their Vegetation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Takano, H., 1962. Notes on epiphytic diatoms upon seaweeds from Japan. J. ocean. Soc. Japan, Vol. 18, pp. 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thresh, J. C., Beale, J. F. & Suckling, E. V., 1949. The Examination of Water and Water Supplies. 6th ed. Ed. by Taylor, E. W.. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Ütermohl, H., 1931. Über das ungekehrte Mikroscop. Arch. Hydrobiol. (Plankt.), Bd. 22, pp. 643–5.Google Scholar
Vogel, A. I., 1939. A Text-book of Quantitative Inorganic Analysis. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Von Stosch, H. A., 1956. Die zentrischen Grundiatomeen. Beiträge zur Floristik und Ökologie einer Pflanzengese Ilschaft der Nordsee. Wiss. Meeresunters, Abt. Helgoland, Bd. 5, pp. 273–91.Google Scholar