Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:20:52.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on Polystomella Lamarck (Foraminifera)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Margaret W. Jepps
Margaret W. Jepps
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Zoology in the University of Glasgow, late Leverhulme Research Fellow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Part I. After a brief statement of the present unsatisfactory position regarding the life history of Polystomella crispa, an account is given of experiments with various fixatives on P. crispa, collected near Drake's Island, Plymouth. A method is described for the cultivation of Polystomella in diatom cultures, especially with Navicula mutica var., with which a flagellate (Bodo sp.) was constantly present. The identification of individual Foraminifera, and determination of growth, were often possible by some irregularity in the shell, or by noting the attachment of one or more stalked egg cocoons of an unknown turbellarian worm. The feeding of Polystomella on diatoms seized by the pseudopodia outside the shell is described; the structures previously taken for ingested algal cells inside the shell are shown to be foraminal plugs (‘bouchons’ of le Calvez) which are discarded from time to time and thrown out of the shell along with the excretory granules (xanthosomes), mostly via the canal system.

Part II. Notes are given on the microspheric form and its reproduction, through the spring and summer, by schizogony. The rearing of two broods in laboratory cultures is described, with an account of the formation of a new chamber to the shell. It is concluded that a complete life cycle consisting of one microspheric and one megalospheric phase occupies a period of about two years.

Part III. Sporulation of the megalospheric form is described as seen during life; and various factors are discussed which might affect the process. The relatively small size of the reproducing Polystomella with which Lister worked is ascribed to their having lived under less favourable conditions. From a study of stained preparations, certain details are added concerning the opening up of the shell, presumably to facilitate the eventual escape of the flagellate swarm spores; also concerning the accompanying cytoplasmic and nuclear changes. Some account is given of the form and structure of the swarm spores, both alive and in permanent preparations. Experiments are described which constitute an attempt to carry the life cycle beyond the stage of sporulation. They are so far unsuccessful, with one possible exception, under all the various experimental conditions which are briefly discussed in their turn.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , October 1942 , pp. 607 - 666
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brady, H. B., 1884. Report on the Foraminifera dredged by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’ during the years 1873–6. Challenger Reports, Vol. IX, Zoology.Google Scholar
Bütschli, O., 1894. Protoplasm and Microscopic Foams. Translated by Minchin, E. A.. London, p. 94.Google Scholar
Calvez, J.LE, , 1938. Recherches sur les Foraminifères. Arch. Zool. Expr. Gén., T. 80, p. 163.Google Scholar
Carpenter, W. B., 1860. Researches on Foraminifera, 4th series. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Vol. 150, p. 535.Google Scholar
Cushman, , Joseph, A., 1933. Foraminifera; their Classification and Economic Use, 2nd ed.; also illustrated key to the same. Sharon, Mass.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1835. Observations nouvelles sur les prétendus Céphalopodes microscopiques. Ann. Set. Nat., Sér. 2, T. III, Zoologie.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. 1841. Histoire Naturelle des Zoophytes. Paris.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, H., 1839. Über noch jetzt zahlreich lebende Thierarten der Kreidebildung und der Organismus der Polythalamien. Abhandl. d. Akad. der Wiss. zu Berlin, p. 18.Google Scholar
Føyn, , Bjørn, , 1936a. Über die Kernverhältnisse der Foraminifere Myxotheca arenilega Schaudinn. Arch, für Protistenk., Bd. 87, p. 272.Google Scholar
Føyn, , Bjørn, , 1936b. Foraminiferenstudien. I. Der Lebenszyklus von Discorbina villardeboana. Bergens Mus. Årb., Naturv. rekke, No. 2.Google Scholar
Føyn, , Bjørn, 1937. Foraminiferenstudien. II. Zur Kenntniss der sexuellen Fortpflanzung und der Entwicklung der Gamonten von Discorbina villardeboana. Bergens Årb., Naturv. rekke, No. 5.Google Scholar
Gatenby, J.Brontë, , 1937. Biological Laboratory Technique. London.Google Scholar
Gatenby, J.Brontë, & Cowdry, E. V., 1928. Bolles Lee's Microtomist's vade-mecum, 9th ed. London.Google Scholar
Gross, F., 1934. Zur Biologie und Entwicklungsgeschichte von Noctiluca miliaris. Arch, für Protistenk., Bd. 83, p. 178.Google Scholar
Gross, F., 1937. Notes on the culture of some marine plankton organisms. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, p. 753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, H. W., 1928. Biological Chemistry and Physics of Sea Water. Cambridge Comparative Physics Series.Google Scholar
Heron-Allen, E., 1914. Contribution to the bionomics and reproductive processes of the Foraminifera. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B, Vol. 206, p. 227.Google Scholar
Heron-Allen, E., 1930. The further and final researches of Joseph Jackson Lister upon the reproductive processes of Polystomella crispa (Linné). Publication No. 3067, Smithsonian Institution, Washington.Google Scholar
Hofker, J., 1930a. Notizen über die Foraminiferen des Golfes von Neapel. Publ. Staz. Zool. di Napoli, Vol. X, Fasc. 3, p. 365.Google Scholar
Hofker, J., 1930b. Die Fortpflanzung der Foraminiferen. Ann. Protistologie, Vol. III, p. 25.Google Scholar
Jennings, H. S., 1939. Mating in Paramecium. Genetics, Vol. 24, p. 202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jepps, , Margaret, W., 1926. Contribution to the study of Gromia oviformis Duj. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., Vol. 70, p. 701.Google Scholar
Kerrj, J.Graham, , 1921. Zoology for Medical Students. London.Google Scholar
Klebs, G.J. 1892. Flagellatenstudien. I. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., Bd. LV, p. 265.Google Scholar
Kofoid, C. A., 1934. An interpretation of the conflicting views as to the life cycle of the Foraminifera. Science, Vol. 79, p. 436.Google Scholar
Lang, A., 1901. Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie der wirbellosen Tiere, Lief. II, Protozoa. 2nd ed. Jena.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, J. J., 1892–1905. Laboratory Notebooks, Vols. I and II. In Heron-Allen and Earland collection of the British Museum of Natural History, London.Google Scholar
Lister, J. J. 1895. Contributions to the life-history of the Foraminifera. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B, Vol. 186, p. 401.Google Scholar
Lister, J. J. 1903. The Foraminifera, in A Treatise of Zoology, edited by Lankester, E. Ray, Pt. 1, Fasc. 2. London.Google Scholar
Lister, J. J. 1906. The life-history of the Foraminifera. Rep. Brit. Assoc. Av. Sci., Section D.Google Scholar
Lister, J. J. 1907. The Foraminifera. Proc. Roy. Inst. Great Britain, Vol. XVIII, p. 459.Google Scholar
Lowndes, A. G., 1935. The twin polygraph and strobograph. Nature, Vol. 135, p. 1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclagan, D.Stewart, , 1932. An ecological study of the Lucerne Flea. Bull. Ent. Res., Vol. 23, p. 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1931. Plymouth Marine Fauna, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. & Hayden, F. V., 1864. Palaeontology of the Upper Missouri. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, No. 172, p. 13.Google Scholar
Millet, F. W., 1904. Report on the recent Foraminifera of the Malay Archipelago. Pt. XVII. Journ. Roy. Micr. Soc., p. 597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, , Earl Hamlet, , 1935a. The life–history of Patellina corrugata. Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanography. Technical series, Vol. 3, No. 15, p. 355.Google Scholar
Myers, , Earl Hamlet, , 1935b. Morphogenesis of the test and the biological significance of dimorphism in the Foraminifer Patellina corrugata Williamson. Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanography. Technical series, No. 16, p. 393.Google Scholar
Myers, , Earl Hamlet, , 1936. The life–cycle of Spirillina vivipara. Journ. Roy. Micr. Soc., Vol. LVI, p. 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ovey, C. D., 1938. Difficulties in establishing relationships in the Foraminifera. Proc. Geologists' Assoc., Vol. XLIX, p. 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhumbler, L., 1900. Foraminiferen, in Nordisches-Plankton, Erste Lief, Teil XIV. Kiel and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rhumbler, L., 1909. Die Foraminiferen der Plankton-Expedition, Pt. 1. Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der IIumboldt-Stiftung, Bd. III.Google Scholar
Romeis, B., 1928. Taschenbuch der microscopischen Technik, 12th ed. Munich and Berlin.Google Scholar
Saedeleer, H.DE, , 1932. Recherches sur les pseudopodes des Rhizopodes testacés Arch. Zool. Expér, Gén., T. 74, p. 597.Google Scholar
Sandon, H.J. 1934. Pseudopodial movements of Foraminifera. Nature, Vol. 133, p. 761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaudinn, F., 1893. Myxotheca arenilega n.g., n.sp., ein neuer mariner Rhizopode. Arbeiten, p. 31.Google Scholar
Schaudinn, F., 1894a. Über die systematischen Stellung und Fortpflanzung von Hyalopus n.g. (Gromia dujardinii Schultze). Arbeiten, p. 45.Google Scholar
Schaudinn, F., 1894b. Die Fortpflanzung der Foraminiferen und eine neue Art der Kernvermehrung. Arbeiten, p. 41.Google Scholar
Schaudinn, F., 1895a. Über den Dimorphismus der Foraminiferen. Arbeiten, p. 57.Google Scholar
Schaudinn, F., 1895b. Untersuchungen an Foraminiferen. I. Calcituba polymorpha. Arbeiten, p. 1.Google Scholar
Schaudinn, F., 1899. Untersuchungen über den Generationswechsel von Trichosphaerium sieboldii Schn. Arbeiten, p. 150.Google Scholar
Schaudinn, F., 1903. Untersuchungen über die Fortpfianzung einiger Rhizopoden. I. Polystomella crispa. Arbeiten, p. 499.Google Scholar
Schlumberger, , Ch., , 1896. La plastogamie dans les Foraminifères. Abstracted in Zool. Centralbl., Bd. III, p. 684.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W. J., 1937. Über den Feinbau der Filopodien insbesondere ihre Doppelbrechung bei Miliola. Protoplasm, Bd. 27, p. 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, , Max, S., 1854. Über den Organismus der Polythalamien. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E., 1877. Rhizopodienstudien. VI. Arch, für mikr. Anat., Bd. 13, p. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan Sin Hok, , 1935. Zur Theorie des Trimorphismus und zum initial Polymorphismus der Foraminiferen. Natuurk. Tijdschr. Ned. Ind., Vol. XCV, p. 171.Google Scholar
Verworn, M., 1889. Psycho-physiologische Protistenstudien. Jena.Google Scholar
Wilhelmi, J., 1909. Tricladen. Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel. Mongr. 32.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C., 1849. On the structure of the shell and soft animal of Polystomella crispa. Trans. Micr. Soc., Vol. 11.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C., 1852. On the minute structure of the calcareous shells of some recent species of Foraminifera. Trans. Micr. Soc., Vol. III.Google Scholar
Winter, F. W., 1907. Zur Kenntniss der Thalamophoren. Arch, für Protistenk., Bd. X, p. 1.Google Scholar
Young, J. Z., 1935. Osmotic pressure of fixing solutions. Nature, Vol. 135, p. 823CrossRefGoogle Scholar