Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:49:36.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on a Calanus Patch II. The estimation of algal productive rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. H. Cushing
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft

Extract

Algal productive rates have rarely been estimated at sea, although many estimates have been made of primary productivity as g carbon/m2/day. A distinction may be drawn between productive rate and productivity, and it is in the use of the term ‘standing stock’. The latter is the quantity of living algal material per unit volume or beneath unit surface. The productive rate is the rate at which the standing stock reproduces itself; for a given species it is of course a division rate. It is expedient to use the term ‘division rate’ for a single species, but the term ‘productive rate’ may be used for the whole algal community. The productivity is the product of standing stock and productive rate and so contains in it the very great variations of standing stock that are the common experience of all planktologists.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cushing, D. H., 1955. Production and a pelagic fishery. Fish. Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 18, No. 7.Google Scholar
Cushing, D. H., 1959, On the nature of production in the sea. Fish. Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 22, No. 6.Google Scholar
Cushing, D. H. & Tungate, D. S., 1963. Studies on a Calanus patch. I. The identification of a Calanus patch. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 327–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, V. W., 1902. Om jordrotationens inverkan på vindstrommar i hafvet. Nyt Mag. Naturv., Bd. 40.Google Scholar
Harding, J. P., 1949. The use of probability paper for the graphical analysis of polymodal frequency distributions. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 141–53.Google Scholar
Jenkin, P. M., 1937. Oxygen production by the diatom Coscinodiscus excentricus Ehr. in relation to submarine illumination in the English Channel. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 22, pp. 301–43.Google Scholar
Jerlov, N. G., 1951. Optical studies of ocean waters. Rep. Swedish deep-sea Exped., 1947–8, Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 159.Google Scholar
Kimball, H. H., 1928. Amount of solar radiation that reaches the surface of the earth on the land and on the sea and methods by which it is measured. Mon. Weath. Rev., Vol. 56, pp. 393–8.Google Scholar
Lund, J. W. G., 1950. Studies on Asterionella formosa Hass. II. Nutrient depletion and the spring maximum. J. Ecol., Vol. 38, (1), pp. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosby, H., 1936. Verdiinstung und Strahlung auf dem Meere. Ann. Hydrogr., Berl., Bd. 64, pp. 281–6.Google Scholar
Savage, R. E., 1926. The plankton of a herring ground. Fish. Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 9, No. 1.Google Scholar
Sverdrup, H. U., Johnson, M. W. & Fleming, R. H., 1942. The Oceans, their Physics, Chemistry and general Biology, 1087 pp. New York: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Thorade, H., 1914. Die Geschwindigkeit von Triftstromungen und die Ekmansche Theorie. Ann. Hydrogr., Berl., Bd. 42, p. 379.Google Scholar
Wiedling, S., 1948. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der vegetativen Vermehrung der Diatomeen. Bot. Notiser, 1948, No. 3.Google Scholar