Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:31:22.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stock size assessment and spatial distribution of bivalve species in the Gulf of Tunis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2011

Aymen Charef ,
Nedra Zamouri Langar  and
Ines Houas Gharsallah
Aymen Charef*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Fisheries Biology, Department of Aquatic Biosciences, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1, Yayoi, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 113-8657
Nedra Zamouri Langar
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Live Marine Resources, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, INSTM, 28 Rue 2 mars 1934, 2025 Salammbô, Tunisia
Ines Houas Gharsallah
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Live Marine Resources, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, INSTM, 28 Rue 2 mars 1934, 2025 Salammbô, Tunisia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A. Charef, Laboratory of Fisheries Biology, Department of Aquatic Biosciences, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1, Yayoi, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 113-8657 email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The shellfish ranching, its current exploitation status and its management are becoming a major interest in fisheries industry in Tunisia. In this respect, the coasts of the Gulf of Tunis were explored along 20 shore-perpendicular transects to evaluate the stock size of shellfish populations. 285 samples of malacological fauna were collected by a VanVeen grab. This sampling revealed the presence of six target bivalve species owing to their high commercial value. The determination of the weight–size relationships of each species pinpointed that five species have a negative allometric relationship (Tellina planata, Tellina nitida, Glycymeris violacescens, Donax semistriatus and Solen marginatus) whilst Mactra stultorum indicated an isometric growth. The stock size assessment of these target species revealed that abundance values ranged from 2 to 60 individuals m−2, and biomass values varied from 2 to 230 g m−2. The mapping of the spatial distribution of density and biomass showed that the majority of species colonized essentially shallow waters corresponding to sandy and muddy bottoms. These findings are consistent with ecological and physiological properties of species. Major physical parameters influencing spatial distribution patterns are discussed.

Keywords

edible shellfish speciesweight–size relationshipabundancebiomassGulf of Tunis (Tunisia)
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 179 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Added, A., Ben Mammou, A., Abdeljaoued, S., Essonni, N. and Fernex, F. (2003) Caractérisation géochimique des sédiments de surface du Golfe de Tunis. Bulletin de L'Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, Salammbô 30, 135–142.Google Scholar
Ansell, A.D. (1983) The biology of the genus Donax. In McLachlan, A. and Erasmus, T. (eds) Sandy beaches as ecosystems. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Sandy Beaches, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 17–21 January, 1983. The Hague: Junk Publishers, pp. 607–635.Google Scholar
Ansell, A.D. and Lagardère, F. (1980) Observations on the biology of Donax trunculus and Donax vittatus at Ile d'Orelon (French Atlantic coast). Marine Biology 57, 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayari, R. and Afli, A. (2003) Bionomie benthique du petit Golfe de Tunis. Bulletin de l'Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, Salammbô 30, 79–90.Google Scholar
Azzouz, A. (1973) Les fonds chalutables de la région nord de la Tunisie. 1. Cadre physique et biocénoses benthiques. Bulletin de l'Institut National Scientifique et Technique d'Océanographie et de Peche de Salammbô 2, 473–563.Google Scholar
Ben Abdallah, O., Ben Hadj Hamida, N. and Jarboui, O. (2006) Evaluation et cartographie des coauillages dans la partie marine de la region de Zarzis. Bulletin de l'Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, Salammbô 33, 13–21.Google Scholar
Ben Salem, S., Franquesa, R. and El Abed, A. (2002) Indicateurs socioéconomiques pour la pêche au Golfe de Gabès (Tunisie). INSTM and FAO–Copemed, 34 pp.Google Scholar
Bustamante, R.H., Branch, G.M., Eekhout, S., Robertson, B., Zoutendyk, P., Schleyer, M., Dye, A., Hanekom, N., Keats, D., Jurd, M. and McQuaid, C. (1995) Gradients of intertidal primary productivity around the coast of South Africa and their relationships with consumer biomass. Oecologia 102, 189–201.Google Scholar
Charef, A., Zamouri-Langar, N., Romdhane, M.S., Houas-Garsallah, I. and Khazri, S. (2005) First Inventory of benthic macrofauna in the north lagoon of Tunis, 17 years after restoration. Proceedings of the 6th Tunisian Japanese Seminar on Culture, Science and Technology, pp. 155–157.Google Scholar
Daly Yahia, M.N., Daly Yahia-Kefi, O., Souissi, S., Maamouri, F. and Aissa, P. (2005) Associations Tintinnides (Ciliphora, Tintinnina)–Dinoflagellées (Dinophyceae) autotrophes potentiellement nuisibles au niveau de la Baie de Tunis et de deux lagunes associées: Ghar El Melh et Tunis Sud (Méditerranée Sud Occidentale), Société Franco-Japonaise d'Océanographie, Tokyo: La mer 43, 19–23.Google Scholar
DGPA (Direction Générale de la Pêche et de l'Aquaculture) (2009) Annual statistics of fisheries products in Tunisia. 135 pp.Google Scholar
Enzenross, L. and Enzenross, R. (2001) Untersuchungen über das Vorkommen mariner Mollusken in tunesischen Gewässern. Schriften für Malakozoologie 17, 45–62.Google Scholar
Gaspar, M.B., Santos, M.N. and Vasconcelos, P. (2001) Weight–length relationships of 25 bivalve species (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the Algarve Coast (southern Portugal). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 805–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, M.B., Chicharo, L. M., Vasconcelos, P., Garcia, A., Santos, A.R. and Moteiro, C.C. (2002) Depth segregation phenomenon in Donax trunculus (Bivalvia: Donacidae) populations of the Algarve coast (southern Portugal). Scientia Marina 66, 111–121.Google Scholar
Grall, J. and Glemarec, M. (1997) Using biotic indices to estimate macrobenthic community perturbations in the Bay of Brest. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 44 (Supplement A), 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, E.G. (1969) Form, function and evolution. In Moore, R.C. (ed.) Part N, I, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia. Kansas: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, pp. N129–N205.Google Scholar
Lauzier, R.B., Hand, C.M., Campbell, A. and Heizer, S. (1998) A review of the biology and fisheries of the horse clams (Tresus capax and Tresus nuttallii). Canadian Stock Assessment Secreteriat, Research Document N°98/88, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Le Moal, Y. (1993) Variabilité spatio-temporelle intrannuelle des populations de Donax en Baie de Douarnenez. Bulletin d'écologie 24, 75–77.Google Scholar
Lubet, P. and Azzouz, A. (1969) Etude des fonds chalutables du golfe de Tunis. Bulletin de l'Institut National Scientifique et Technique d'Océanographie et de Peche de Salammbô 1, 87–111.Google Scholar
Mars, P. (1958) Etude sur le seuil siculo-tunisien. Mollusques testacés. Résultats scientifiques de la campagne de Calypso. Annuaire de l'Institut Océanographique, Paris 34, 127–143.Google Scholar
Mayrat, A. (1970) Allometrie et taxinomie. Revue de Statistique Appliquée 18, 47–58.Google Scholar
Menge, B.A. and Olson, A.M. (1990) Role of scale and environmental factors in regulation of community. Trends in Ecolology and Evolution 5, 52–67.Google Scholar
Moilinier, R. and Picard, J. (1954) Eléments de la bionomie marine sur les côtes de Tunisie. Bulletin de l'Institut National Scientifique et Technique d'Océanographie et de Peche de Salammbô 1, 48–54.Google Scholar
Morrisey, D.J., Howitt, L., Underwood, A.J. and Stark, J.S. (1992) Spatial variation in soft-sediment benthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series 81, 197–204.Google Scholar
Neuberger-Cywiak, L., Achituv, Y. and Mizrahi, L. (1990) The ecology of Donax trunculus Linnaeus and Donax semistriatus Poli from the Mediterranean coast of Israel. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 134, 203–220.Google Scholar
Odum, E.P. (1971) Fundamentals of ecology. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
Pallary, P. (1914) Liste des Mollusques du golfe de Tunis. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de l'Afrique du Nord 5, 12–27.Google Scholar
Savina, M. (2004) Modélisation écologique des populations de palourdes roses (Paphia rhomboïdes) et d'amandes de mer (Glycymeris glycymeris) en Manche. PhD thesis. University of Aix-Marseille II, France.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.P. and Rohlf, F.J. (1987) Introduction to biostatistics. 2nd edition. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Stanley, S.M. (1970) Relation of shell form to life habits in the Bivalvia (Mollusca). The Geological Society of America, Memoirs 125, 1–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirado, C. and Salas, C. (1999) Reproduction of Donax venustus Poli 1795, Donax semistriatus Poli 1795 and intermediate morphotypes (Bivalvia: Donacidae) in the littoral of Málaga (Southern Spain). Marine Ecology 20, 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urban, J.H. (1994) Adaptations of six infaunal bivalve species of Chile: coexistence resulting from differences in morphology, burrowing depth and substrate preference. Archive of Fishery and Marine Research 42, 183–193.Google Scholar
Van Langevelde, F. and Prins, H. (2007) Resilience and restoration of soft-bottom near-shore ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 591, 1–4.Google Scholar
Zaklan, S.D. and Ydenberg., R. (1997) The body size–burial depth in the infaunal clam Mya arenaria. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 215, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamouri, N., Chouba, L. and Abed, A. (2001) Benthic macrofauna in the three ports of Tunis, impacts of pollution. In Özhan E. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Mediterranean Coastal Environment Med Coast01, 23–27 October, 2001. Hammamet, Tunisia, pp. 641–650.Google Scholar
Zaouali, J. (1971) Notes sur la présence de Standella (Eastonia) rugosa Gmelin Eulamellebrachia, Mactridae dans le Golfe de Tunis. Bulletin de l'Institut National Scientifique et Technique d'Océanographie et de Peche de Salammbô. 2, 95–97.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical analysis. 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International Inc.Google Scholar
Zarrad, R., Missaoui, H., Alemany, F., Hamza, A., Romdhane, M.S., García, A., Jarboui, O and M'rabet, R. (2008) Distribution and abundance of early life stages of Sardina pilchardus in the Gulf of Tunis (Central Mediterranean Sea) in relation to environmental and biological factors. Scientia Marina 72, 299–309.Google Scholar
Zarrad, R., El Abed, A., M'rabet, R., Missaoui, H. and Romdhane, M.S. (2003) Distribution spatiale de l'ichtyoplancton en été et en automne et conditions environnementales dans le golfe de Tunis. Bulletin de L'Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, Salammbô 30, 39–47.Google Scholar
Zeggaf Tahri, M. (1999) Etude de l'impact des ouvrages de protection sur la dynamique sédimentaire du littoral du golfe de Tunis et des côtes nord de Mahdia. PhD thesis. University of Sciences, Tunis.Google Scholar
Zouari, S. (1985) Contribution à l'étude systématique des Lamellibranches des côtes tunisiennes. Diplome d'Etudes Approfondies en Biologie Marine et Océanographie, University of Sciences, Tunis.Google Scholar