Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:19:33.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial Distribution and Biological Rhythms of Suprabenthic Mysids from the English Channel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Souaad Zouhiri ,
Carole Vallet ,
Pascal Mouny  and
Jean-Claude Dauvin
Souaad Zouhiri
Affiliation:
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de Biologie des Invertébrés Marins et Malacologie, CNRS URA 699, 57 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris, France.
Carole Vallet
Affiliation:
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de Biologie des Invertébrés Marins et Malacologie, CNRS URA 699, 57 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris, France.
Pascal Mouny
Affiliation:
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de Biologie des Invertébrés Marins et Malacologie, CNRS URA 699, 57 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris, France.
Jean-Claude Dauvin
Affiliation:
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de Biologie des Invertébrés Marins et Malacologie, CNRS URA 699, 57 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris, France.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One hundred and ninety-eight suprabenthic hauls from the English Channel and the Seine Estuary were taken with a modified Macer-GIROQ sledge. Numerically, mysids were the dominant group amongst the peracarids collected with the sledge and 28 species were recorded. Mysid densities were higher in the oligohaline zone (>200,000 ind 100 m-3) of the Seine Estuary than at other stations in the English Channel (where the density was the highest on medium sand stations, ~5000 ind 100 m-3). Two main gradients of mysid distribution were identified: (1) a higher species richness in the western part of the Channel compared with the eastern part of the Channel; and (2) an increasing density gradient from west to east during spring and a decreasing gradient from west to east during the autumn (eastern high abundance of Haplostylus spp. during spring, and western high abundance of Schistomysis ornata and Erythrops elegans during autumn). Mysids showed important diel rhythms with maximum abundance at sunrise and sunset, and low density at night. According to their swimming activities, suprabenthic mysids were classified into three groups: upper organisms with a very strong activity, species with a strong activity and occupying the whole water column near the sea-floor, and lower species with limited swimming activity. Nevertheless, the swimming activity could be modified according to the hydrodynamics of each site. A seasonal cycle of abundance (summer recruitment for dominant species Anchialina agilis, Haplostylus lobatus, Haplostylus normani) was observed on two stations where temporal samples along the year were available.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 78 , Issue 4 , November 1998 , pp. 1181 - 1202
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anger, K. & Valentin, C., 1976. In situ studies of the diurnal activity of Diastylis rathkei (Cumacea, Crustacea) and its importance for the “hyperbenthos”. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 28, 138–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzécri, J.P., 1973. L'analyse des données. Tome 2. L'analyse des correspondances. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Brattegard, T. & Fosså, J.H., 1991. Replicability of an epibenthic sampler. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunei, P., Besner, M., Messier, D., Poirier, L., Granger, D. & Weinstein, M., 1978. Le traîneau MACER-GIROQ: appareil amélioré pour l'échantillonnage quantitatif de la petite faune nageuse au voisinage du fond. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie, 63, 815–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhl-Jensen, L. & Fossâ, J.H., 1991. Hyperbenthic crustacean fauna of the Gullmarfjord area (western Sweden): species richness, seasonal variation and long-term changes. Marine Biology, 109, 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabioch, L., Gentil, F., Glacpn, R. & Retière, C., 1977. Le macrobenthos des fonds meubles de la Manche: distribution générate et écologie. In Biology of Benthic Organisms, Proceedings of the 11th European Marine Biology Symposium, Galway, Ireland, October 1976 (ed. B.F., Keegan et al.), pp. 115–128. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cartes, J.E. & Sorbe, J.C., 1995. Deep-water mysids of the Catalan Sea: species composition, bathymetric and near-bottom distribution. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 75, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauvin, J.-C., Iglesias, A. & Lorgeré, J.C., 1994. Suprabenthic crustacean fauna of the circalitoral coarse sand community off Roscoff (English Channel): composition, swimming activity and seasonal variation. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 74, 543–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauvin, J.-C. & Lorgeré, J.C., 1989. Modifications du traîneau Macer-GIROQ pour amélioration de l'échantillonnage quantitatif étagé de la faune suprabenthique. Journal de Recherches Oceanographiques, 14, 65–67.Google Scholar
Dauvin, J.-C., Sorbe, J.C. & Lorgere, J.C., 1995. The Benthic Boundary Layer macrofauna from the upper continental slope and the Cap-Ferret Canyon (Bay of Biscay). Oceanologica Acta, 18, 113–122.Google Scholar
Dauvin, J.-C. & Zouhiri, S., 1996. Suprabenthic crustacean fauna of a dense Ampelisca community from the English Channel. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 76, 909–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elizalde, M., Dauvin, J.-C. & Sorbe, J.C., 1991. Les mysidacés suprabenthiques de la marge sud du canyon du Cap-Ferret (Golfe de Gascogne): répartition bathymétrique et activité natatoire. Annales de l'Institut Océanographique, 67, 129–144.Google Scholar
Fosså, J.H., 1985. Near-bottom vertical zonation during daytime of deep-living hyperbenthic mysids (Crustacea: Mysidacea). Sarsia, 70, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froglia, C., Laposta, S., Mariniello, L. & Ruffo, S., 1995. Crustacea Malacostraca II (Phyllocarida, Hoplocarida, Bathynellacea, Thermosbaenacea, Mysidacea, Cumacea). In Checklist delle species della fauna Italiana (ed. A., Minelli and S., Ruffo), 29, 1–12. Bologna: Calderini.Google Scholar
Fulton, R.S. III, 1982a. Preliminary results of an experimental study of the effects of mysid predation on estuarine zooplankton community structure. Hydrobiologia, 93, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, R.S. III, 1982b. Predatory feeding of two marine mysids. Marine Biology, 72, 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, P.M., 1985. The distribution of Mysidacea in the open ocean and near-bottom over slope regions in the northern North Sea, Atlantic ocean during 1979. Journal of Plankton Research, 7, 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesthagen, I.H., 1973. Diurnal and seasonal variations in the near-bottom fauna - the hyperbenthos - in one of the deeper channels of the Kieler Bucht (western Baltic). Kieler Meeresforschungen, 29, 116–140.Google Scholar
Jambu, M. & Lebeaux, M.O., 1978. Classification automatique pour l'analyse des données. 2. Logiciels. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Kaartvedt, S., 1985. Diel changes in small-scale vertical distribution of hyperbenthic mysids. Sarsia, 70, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaartvedt, S., 1989. Retention of vertically migrating suprabenthic mysids in fjords. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 57, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macquart-Moulin, C., 1973. L'activité natatoire rythmique chez les péracarides benthoplanctoniques. Déterminisme endogène des rythmes nycthéméraux. Tethys, 5, 209–231.Google Scholar
Macquart-Moulin, C., 1975. Les peracarides benthiques dans le plancton Amphipodes, Cumacés, Isopodes, Mysidacés. Analyse des comportements migratoires dans le Golfe de Marseille. Recherches expérimentales sur l'origine des migrations et le controle de la distribution des espèces. Thèse Doctorat d'Etat Université, Aix-Marseille II, France.Google Scholar
Macquart-Moulin, C., 1977. Les réactions photocinétiques des péracarides du plancton nocturne. Fraction planctonique: Gastrosaccus lobatus et Gastrosaccus armatus. Tethys, 7, 339–348.Google Scholar
Macquart-Moulin, C., 1984. La phase pélagique nocturne et les comportements migratoires des Amphipodes benthiques (Méditerranée nord-occidentale). Tethys, 11, 171–196.Google Scholar
Macquart-Moulin, C., 1985. Le contrôle des phases pélagiques nocturnes chez les crustacés péracarides benthiques. Tethys, 11, 275–287.Google Scholar
Macquart-Moulin, C., Bourdillon, A., Cubizolles, F., Passelaige, F. & Rasoanarivo, R., 1987. Un cas typique de migration vertical ‘retard’ chez l'amphipode Ampelisca typica. Journal of Plankton Research, 9, 785–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macquart-Moulin, C. & Patriti, G., 1993. Canyons sous-marins et advection vers le talus continental du plancton neritique. Oceanologica Acta, 16, 179–189.Google Scholar
Macquart-Moulin, C. & Ribera Maycas, E., 1995. Inshore and offshore diel migrations in European benthopelagic mysids, genera Gastrosaccus, Anchialina and Haplostylus (Crustacea, Mysidacea). Journal of Plankton Research, 17, 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1971. Seasonal occurrence of mysids (Crustacea) and evidence of social behaviour. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 809–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1980. The biology of mysids and euphausiids. Advances in Marine Biology, 18, 1–681.Google Scholar
Mees, J., 1994. The hyperbenthos of shallow coastal waters and estuaries: community structure and biology of the dominant species. PhD thesis, University of Gent.Google Scholar
Mees, J., Cattrijsse, A. & Hamerlynck, O., 1993a. Distribution and abundance of shallow-water hyperbenthic mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) and euphausiids (Crustacea, Euphausiacea) in the Voordelta and the Westerschelde, southwest Netherlands. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 34, 165–186.Google Scholar
Mees, J., Dewicke, A. & Hamerlynck, O., 1993b. Seasonal composition and spatial distribution of hyperbenthic communities along estuarine gradients in the Western-Shelde. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 27, 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mees, J. & Hamerlynck, O., 1992. Spatial community structure of the winter hyperbenthos of the Shelde Estuary, the Netherlands, and the adjacent coastal waters. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 29, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mees, J. & Jones, M.B., 1997. The hyperbenthos: a review. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review, 35, 221–255.Google Scholar
Moffat, A.M. & Jones, M.B., 1992. Bionomics of Mesopodopsis slabberi and Neomysis integer (Crustacea: Mysidacea) in the Tamar Estuary. In Taxonomy, biology and ecology of (Baltic) mysids (Mysidacea: Crustacea) (ed. Von J., Köhn et al.), pp. 109–119. Rostock: Rostock University Press.Google Scholar
Moffat, A.M. & Jones, M.B., 1993. Correlation of the distribution of Mesopodopsis slaberri (Crustacea, Mysidacea) with physico-chemical gradients in a partially-mixed estuary (Tamar, England). Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 27, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouny, P., Wanz, Z. & Dauvin, J.-C., 1996. Premieres données sur la structure spatio-temporelle du mesozooplancton et du suprabenthos de l'estuaire de la Seine. Journal de Recherches Océanographiques, 21, 100–108.Google Scholar
Roger, N., Bamber, N. & Henderson, P.A., 1994. Seasonality of caridean decapod and mysid distribution and movements within the Severn Estuary and Bristol Channel. Biology Journal of the Linnean Society, 51, 83–91.Google Scholar
Scherrer, B., 1984. Biostatistique. Chicoutimi: Gatan Morin Editeur.Google Scholar
Sorbe, J.C., 1984. Contribution à la connaissance des peuplements suprabenthiques néritiques sudGascogne. Thèse Doctorat d'Etat, Université de Bordeaux, France.Google Scholar
Tattersall, W.M. & Tattersall, O.S., 1951. The Bristish Mysidacea. London: The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Vallet, C. & Dauvin, J.-C. 1995. Qualitative et quantitative composition of the hyperbenthic Amphipods from the English Channel. Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii, 42, 461–481.Google Scholar
Vallet, C. & Dauvin, J.-C., 1998. Composition and diversity of the Benthic Boundary Layer Macrofauna from the English Channel. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 78, 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallet, C., Zouhiri, S., Dauvin, J.-C. & Wang, X., 1995. Variations nycthémérales de l'abondance de la faune démersale en Manche. Journal de Recherches Océanographiques, 20, 94—102.Google Scholar
Wang, X. & Dauvin, J.-C., 1994. The suprabenthic crustacean fauna of the infralittoral fine sand community in the Bay of Seine (eastern English Channel): composition, swimming activity and diurnal variations. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 35, 135–155.Google Scholar
Webb, P. & Wooldridge, T.H., 1990. Diel horizontal migration of Mesopodopsis slabberi (Crustacea: Mysidacea) in Algoa Bay, southern Africa. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 62, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zouhiri, S. & Dauvin, J.-C., 1995. Diel changes of the Benthic Boundary Layer macrofauna over coarse sand sediment in the western English Channel. Oceanologica Acta, 19, 141–153.Google Scholar