Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:37:28.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some new supra-littoral Protista

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. R. Droop
M. R. Droop
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Six common supra-littoral Protista from the island of Cumbrae are described and details given of their cultivation. Chlorophyceae: Nannochloris oculata n.sp., Brachiomonas submarina var. pulsifera n.var.; Cryptophyceae: Hemiselmis virescens n.sp.; Chrysophyceae: Syracosphaera elongata n.sp., Microglena arenicola n.sp., Mallomonas epithalattia n.sp.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , June 1955 , pp. 233 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohlin, K., 1897. Zur Morphologie und Biologie einzelliger Algen. Öfvers. VetenskAkad. Förk., Stockh., No. 9, pp. 507–29.Google Scholar
Braarud, T. & Fagerland, E., 1946. A coccolithophoride in laboratory culture: Syracosphaera carterae n.sp. Avh. norske VidenskAkad., 1946, No. 2, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Butcher, R. W., 1952. Contributions to our knowledge of the smaller marine algae. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 31, pp. 175–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, N., 1937. New or interesting algae from brackish water. Arch. Protistenk., Bd. 90, pp. 1–68.Google Scholar
Conrad, W., 1927. Le genre Microglena C. G. Ehrenberg (1838). Arch. Protistenk., Bd. 60, pp. 415–39Google Scholar
Conrad, W. 1933. Révision du genre Mallomonas Perty (1851) inc. Pseudomallomonas Chodat (1920). Mem Mus. Hist. nat. Belg., No. 56580 pp.Google Scholar
Conrad, W. 1939. Notes Protistologiques. X. Sur le schorre de Lilloo. Bull. Mus. Hist. nat. Belg., T. 15, No. 41, 18 pp.Google Scholar
Droop, M. R., 1953. On the ecology of flagellates from some brackish and fresh water rock-pools of Finland. Acta bot.fenn., Vol. 51, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Droop, M. R., 1954a. A note on the isolation of small marine algae and flagellates for pure cultures. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33, pp. 511–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droop, M. R., 1954b. Cobalamin requirement in Chrysophyceae. Nature, Lond., Vol. 174, P 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinshelwood, C. N., 1946. The Chemical Kinetics of the Bacterial Cell. Oxford:Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hutner, S. H. & Provasoli, L., 1951. The phytoflagellates. In: Biochemistry and Physiology of Protozoa, ed. A. Lwoff. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Korschikoff, A., 1928. Notes on some new or little-known Protococcales. i. Dichotomococcus capitatus n.gen. n.sp. 2. Bernardinella bipyramidata Chodat. Arch. Protistenk., Bd. 62, pp. 416–26.Google Scholar
Levander, K. M., 1900. Zur Kenntniss des Lebens in den stehenden Kleingewassern auf den Skareninseln. Acta Soc. Fauna Flora fenn., Vol. 18, No. 6, 107 pp.Google Scholar
Naumann, E., 1931. Notizen zur Systematik der Siisswasseralgen. Arch. Bot., Vol. 16, pp. 16–18.Google Scholar
Parke, M., 1949. Studies on marine flagellates. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 256–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringsheim, E. G., 1946. Pure Cultures of Algae. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Provasoli, L. & Pintner, I. J., 1953. Ecological implications of in vitro nutritional requirements of algal flagellates. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., Vol. 56, pp. 839–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed