Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:03:41.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social structure of the declining resident community of common bottlenose dolphins in the Sado Estuary, Portugal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2011

Joana F. Augusto ,
Patrícia Rachinas-Lopes  and
Manuel E. dos Santos
Joana F. Augusto*
Affiliation:
Unidade de Investigação em Eco-Etologia, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal Projecto Delfim—Centro Português de Estudo dos Mamíferos Marinhos, Rua Alto do Duque 45, 1400-009 Lisboa, Portugal
Patrícia Rachinas-Lopes
Affiliation:
Unidade de Investigação em Eco-Etologia, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal Projecto Delfim—Centro Português de Estudo dos Mamíferos Marinhos, Rua Alto do Duque 45, 1400-009 Lisboa, Portugal
Manuel E. dos Santos
Affiliation:
Unidade de Investigação em Eco-Etologia, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal Projecto Delfim—Centro Português de Estudo dos Mamíferos Marinhos, Rua Alto do Duque 45, 1400-009 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J.F. Augusto, Unidade de Investigação em Eco-Etologia, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The resident population of common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Sado Estuary, Portugal, has been declining at least during the past three decades. A complete photographic census produced a current count of 24 animals—19 adults, three subadults and two calves. It appears to be phylopatric and essentially closed, but given the likely importance that exchanges with neighbouring coastal groups may play, even if rare, the most adequate term to define this dolphin should be community and not population. Large groups with all age-classes are common in the community, possibly as a calf and subadult protection strategy, and this may be related to the fact that these age-classes have had high mortality rates in the last decade. Maternity of two calves was determined, and we found that the two mothers adopted different parenting strategies. While one mother spent more time alone with her calf, the other mother spent more time with her calf in larger groups. The average coefficient of association for this community is 0.45, quite high for this species. Associations and typical group size are similar between all individuals, with no patterning according to age-class or sex, which constitutes an atypical trait for dolphin societies. There are also no clear divisions in this community according to cluster analysis. Associations are preferred and long term, lasting approximately 34 days and fitting a pattern of casual acquaintances, where individuals associate for a period of time, disassociate and may reassociate after that. This reflects the fission–fusion character of the community, but in a more stable manner. We think this is caused by a combination of demographic characteristics and a stable and productive environment, which led to a decrease in competition between individuals.

Keywords

social structurebottlenose dolphinsTursiops truncatusdemographic effectsfission–fusion dynamics
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 92 , Issue 8: Marine Mammals , December 2012 , pp. 1773 - 1782
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bejder, L., Fletcher, D. and Bräger, S. (1998) A method for testing association patterns of social animals. Animal Behaviour 56, 719–725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information–theoretic approach. 1st edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Caeiro, S., Costa, M.H., Ramos, T.B., Fernandes, F., Silveira, N., Coimbra, A., Medeiros, G. and Painho, M. (2005) Assessing heavy metal contamination in Sado Estuary sediment: an index analysis approach. Ecological Indicators 5, 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, S.J. and Schwager, S.J. (1987) A comparison of association indices. Animal Behaviour 35, 1454–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilvers, B.L. and Corkeron, P.J. (2002) Association patterns of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) off Point Lookout, Queensland, Australia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 973–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockcroft, V.G. and Ross, G.J.B. (1990) Age, growth, and reproduction of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus from the east coast of southern Africa. Fishery Bulletin 88, 289–302.Google Scholar
Colgan, P.W. (1978) Hierarchical cluster analysis. In Colgan, P.W. (ed.) Quantitative ethology. 1st edition. New York: J. Wiley & Sons, pp. 116–144.Google Scholar
Connor, R.C., Smolker, R.A. and Richards, A.F. (1992) Two levels of alliance formation among male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89, 987–990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor, R., Wells, R.S., Mann, J. and Read, A.J. (2000) The bottlenose dolphin: social relationships in a fission–fusion society. In Mann, J., Connor, R.C., Tyack, P.L. and Whitehead, H. (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. 2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 91–126.Google Scholar
Connor, R. and Whitehead, H. (2005) Alliances II. Rates of encounter during resource utilization: a general model of intrasexual alliance formation in fission–fusion societies. Animal Behaviour 69, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currey, R.C.J., Dawson, S.M. and Slooten, E. (2009) An approach for regional threat assessment under IUCN Red List criteria that is robust to uncertainty: the Fiordland bottlenose dolphins are critically endangered. Biological Conservation 142, 1570–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
dos Santos, M.E. and Lacerda, M. (1987) Preliminary observations of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) in the Sado estuary (Portugal). Aquatic Mammals 13, 65–80.Google Scholar
Eisfeld, S.M. and Robinson, K.P. (2004) The sociality of bottlenose dolphins in the outer southern Moray Firth, NE Scotland: implications for current management proposals? European Research on Cetaceans 18. [on CD-ROM.]Google Scholar
Elliser, C.R. and Herzing, D.L. (2010) Replacement dolphins? Social restructuring of a resident pod of Atlantic bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, after two major hurricanes. Marine Mammal Science 27, 39–59. Published online: 15 July 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00403.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Félix, F. (1997) Organization and social structure of the coastal bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus in the Gulf de Guayaquil, Ecuador. Aquatic Mammals 23, 1–16.Google Scholar
Gaspar, R. (2003) Status of the resident bottlenose dolphin population in the Sado estuary: past, present and future. PhD thesis. St Andrews University, Scotland.Google Scholar
Gil, O. and Vale, C. (2001) Evidence for polychlorinated biphenyls dechlorination in the sediments of Sado Estuary, Portugal. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42, 453–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gowans, S., Würsig, B. and Karczmarski, L. (2008) The social structure and strategies of delphinds: predictions based on an ecological framework. Advances in Marine Biology 53, 195–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grellier, K., Hammond, P.S., Wilson, B., Sanders-Reed, C.A. and Thompson, P.M. (2003) Use of photo-identification data to quantify mother–calf association patterns in bottlenose dolphins. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81, 1421–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harzen, S. (1995) Behaviour and social ecology of the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus, in the Sado estuary, Portugal. PhD thesis. University of Bielefeld, Germany.Google Scholar
Harzen, S. and dos Santos, M.E. (1992) Three encounters with bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) carrying dead calves. Aquatic Mammals 18, 49–55.Google Scholar
IUCN (2009) 2009 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2. <http://www.iucnredlist.org> (accessed 2 February 2010).+(accessed+2+February+2010).>Google Scholar
Jarman, P.J. (1974) The social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48, 215–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, K.A., Defran, R.H. and Campbell, G.S. (2005) Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Drowned Cayes, Belize: group size, site fidelity and abundance. Caribbean Journal of Science 41, 172–177.Google Scholar
Lehman, J. and Boesch, C. (2004) To fission or to fusion: effects of community size on wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) social organization. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56, 207–216.Google Scholar
Lusseau, D. and Newman, M.E.J. (2004) Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (Supplement) 271, 447–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lusseau, D., Schneider, K., Boisseau, O.J., Haase, P., Slooten, E. and Dawson, S.M. (2003) The bottlenose dolphin community of Doubtful Sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations. Can geographic isolation explain this unique trait? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54, 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B.J.T., Simpson, M.J.A., Hanby, J.P. and Hall-Craggs, J. (1976) Visualizing interaction and sequential data in animal behaviour: theory and application of cluster-analysis methods. Behaviour 56, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, M.E.J. (2004) Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E 70, 056131 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, M.E.J. (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 8577–8582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrin, N. and Lehmann, L. (2001) Is sociality driven by the costs of dispersal or the benefits of phylopatry? A role for kin-discrimination mechanisms. American Naturalist 158, 471–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintana-Rizzo, E. and Wells, R.S. (2001) Resighting and association patterns of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Cedar Keys, Florida: insights into social organization. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, J.E. III, Wells, R.S. and Eide, S.D. (2000) The bottlenose dolphin. Biology and conservation. 1st edition. Florida: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Sequeira, M., Matias, S., Farinha, J.C., Gaspar, R., Silva, C., Augusto, J., Ferreira, C.V., Fonseca, M.J., Narra, P. and Luís, A.R. (2009) Bases para o Plano de Acção para a Salvaguarda e Monitorização da População de Roazes do Estuário do Sado. 1st edition. Lisbon: Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e da Biodiversidade. [In Portuguese.]Google Scholar
Scott, M.D. and Chivers, S.J. (1990) Distribution and herd structure of bottlenose dolphins in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. In Leatherwood, S. and Reeves, R.R. (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. 1st edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S.H. (1990a) Behavior and ecology of the bottlenose dolphin at Sanibel Island, Florida. In Leatherwood, S. and Reeves, R.R. (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. 1st edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S.H. (1990b) Comparison of bottlenose dolphin behavior in Texas and Florida, with a critique of methods for studying dolphin behavior. In Leatherwood, S. and Reeves, R.R. (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. 1st edition, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolker, R.A., Richards, A.F., Connor, R.C. and Pepper, J.W. (1992) Sex differences in patterns of association among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. Behaviour 123, 38–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, W.J. (1998) The importance of behavioral studies in conservation biology. Animal Behaviour, 56, 801–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teixeira, A.M. and Duguy, R. (1981) Observations de Delphinidés dans les eaux cotières portugaises. Relatórios de Actividades do Aquário Vasco da Gama 9, 1–9.Google Scholar
Wells, R.S. and Scott, M.D. (1994) Bottlenose dolphin. In Ridgway, S.R. and Harrison, F.R.S. (eds) Handbook of marine mammals. 2nd edition. London: Academic Press, pp. 137–182.Google Scholar
Whithead, H. (1995) Investigating structure and temporal scale in social organizations using identified individuals. Behavioral Ecology 6, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, H. (1999) Testing association patterns of social animals. Animal Behaviour 57, 26–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehead, H. (2007) Selection of models of lagged identification rates and lagged association rates using AIC and QAIC. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation 36, 1233–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whithead, H. (2008a) Analyzing animal societies: quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis. 1st edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, H. (2008b) Precision and power in the analysis of social structure using associations. Animal Behaviour 75, 1093–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, H. (2009) SOCPROG programs: analyzing social structures. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63, 765–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, H. and Connor, R. (2005) Alliances I. How large should alliances be? Animal Behaviour 69, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, H., Bejder, L. and Ottensmeyer, C.A. (2005) Testing association patterns: issues arising and extensions. Animal Behaviour 69, e1–e6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Würsig, B. and Würsig, M. (1977) The photographic determination of group size, composition, and stability of coastal porpoises (Tursiops truncatus). Science 198, 755–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical analysis. 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar