Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:23:54.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Significance of Squid, Whale and Other Remains From the Stomachs of Bottom-Living Deep-Sea Fish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Malcolm R. Clarke
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Nigel Merrett
Affiliation:
National Institute of Oceanography

Extract

Twenty-four out of 240 fishes caught by bottom lines at 366–3333 m had something in their stomachs. Stomach contents included parts of cephalopods, fish, cetaceans and bottom-living invertebrates, thin rubber sheet and terrestrial mammal bones. The material provides evidence that four species of cephalopod are at least partially demersal and suggests a means by which the tapeworm Phyllobothrium could pass from its secondary to its primary host.

During the five biological cruises of R.R.S. ‘Discovery’ between 1967 and 1971 a total of 31 bottom lines with 1483 hooks were fished in depths of water between 366 and 3333 m. The stomachs of the 240 fish caught were examined and 216 (90%) proved to be empty. The high incidence of empty stomachs is thought to be due to frequent loss of food during the ascent from great depths and accounts for our poor knowledge of the feeding habits of demersal fish living at depths exceeding 400 m.

The present collection of food from 25 stomachs (24 from ‘Discovery’ collections and one from a fish caught by Mr G. R. Forster from R. V. ‘Sarsia’) of fish belonging to 11 species (Table 1) probably gives little indication of the usual diet of the fish concerned, but its nature prompts some useful speculation and the rarity of such observations justifies placing them on record (Bigelow & Schroeder, 1948; Marshall, 1954).

All the fish were caught on lines which lay on the bottom for several hours and it is our firm belief that they were hooked while on or very near the bottom.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berland, B. 1971. Pigghå og hundfuge med gummistrik. Fauna (Blindem), Vol. 24, pp. 35–7.Google Scholar
Bigelow, H. B. & Schroeder, W. C. 1958. Sharks. In ‘Fishes of the Western North Atlantic’. Mem. Sears Fdn. mar. Res., Vol. 1, pp. 59576.Google Scholar
Bruun, A. Fr. 1956. The abyssal fauna: its ecology, distribution and origin. Nature, Lond., Vol. 117, pp. 1105–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. R. 1972. Cephalopoda in the diet of sperm whales of the Southern hemisphere and their bearing on sperm whale biology. ‘Discovery’ Rep. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Clarke, R. 1956. Sperm whales of the Azores. ‘Discovery’ Rep., Vol., 28, pp. 237–98.Google Scholar
Forster, G. R. 1964. Line-fishing on the Continental Slope. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 277–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, G. R. 1967. A new deep-sea ray from the Bay of Biscay. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 47, pp. 281–6.Google Scholar
Forster, G. R. 1968. Line fishing on the Continental Slope: II. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 479–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, G. R.Badcock, J. R.Longbottom, M. R.Merrett, N. R. & Thomson, K. S. 1970. Results of the Royal Society Indian Ocean Deep Slope Fishing Expedition. 1969. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, Vol. 175, pp. 367404.Google Scholar
Heezen, B. C. 1957. Whales entangled in deep sea cables. Deep-Sea Res., Vol. 4, pp. 105–15.Google Scholar
Margolis, L. & Pike, G. C. 1955. Some helminth parasites of Canadian Pacific whales. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., Vol. 12, pp. 97120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, N. B. 1954. Aspects of Deep Sea Biology. 380 pp. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Matthews, L. Harrison 1938. The sperm whale, Physeter catodon. ‘Discovery’ Rep., Vol. 17, pp. 93168.Google Scholar