Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:08:35.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sexually Dimorphic Free-Swimming Behaviour in the Amphipod Crustacean Ampelisca Abdita

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

B. Borowsky  and
P. Aitken
B. Borowsky
Affiliation:
Osborn Laboratories of Marine Sciences, Brooklyn, New York, USA
P. Aitken
Affiliation:
Osborn Laboratories of Marine Sciences, Brooklyn, New York, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper describes a novel sexually dimorphic pattern of behaviour in the tube-building amphiplodAmpelisca abdita (Mills). Mature males and females enter the water column at night. However, while males enter the water column every night, females enter it only when they moult. Since female amphipods only mate shortly after they moult, it is hypothesized that this sexually dimorphic pattern of free-swimming behaviour is an adaptation that permits males and receptive females to locale each other during the brief period when copulation can occur, while reducing the time that females are exposed to pelagic predators.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , August 1991 , pp. 655 - 663
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borowsky, B. 1980. The physiological control of reproductioninMicrodeutopusgryllotalpa (Crustacea: Amphipoda). I. The effects of exogenous ecdysterone on the females' moult and behavioural cycles. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 213, 399–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowsky, B. 1983. Reproductive behaviour of three tube-building peracarid crustaceans: the amphipods Jassafalcata and Amphithoe valida and the tanaid Tanais cavolinii. Marine Biology, 77, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowsky, B. 1984. Effects of receptive females' secretions on some male reproductive behaviours in the amphipod crustacean Microdeutopus gryllotalpa. Marine Biology, 84,183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowsky, B. 1985. The responses of the amphipod crustacean Gammarus palustris to conspecifics' and congenerics' secretions. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 11, 1545–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowsky, B. 1991. Patterns of reproduction of some amphipod crustaceans and insights into the nature of their stimuli. In Crustacean Sexual Biology (ed. Bauer, R. and Martin, J.), pp 56–62. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Borowsky, B. & Borowsky, R. 1987. The reproductive behaviours of the amphipod crustacean Gammarus palustris (Bousfield) and some insights into the nature of their stimuli. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 107,131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, E.L. 1973. Shallow-Water Gammaridean Amphipods of New England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dauvin, J.-C. 1988a. Biologie, dynamique et production de populations de crustacés amphipodes de la MancheOccidentale. 1.Ampelisca tenuicornis Liljeborg. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 118, 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauvin, J.-C. 1988b. Life cycle, dynamics, and productivity of Crustacea-Amphipoda from the western English Channel. 4.Ampelisca armoricana Bellan-Santini et Dauvin. Journal of Experi-mental Marine Biology and Ecology, 123, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauvin, J.-C. 1989. Life cycle, dynamics, and productivity of Crustacea-Amphipoda from the western English Channel. 5.Ampelisca sarsi Chevreux. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 128, 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, D.R. and Harris, W.H. 1988. Seasonal and spatial variability in macrobenthos communities in Jamaica Bay, New York - an urban estuary. Estuaries, 11, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleeson, R.A. 1982. Morphological and behavioural identification of the sensory structures mediating pheromone reception in the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 163, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, M.H. 1981. The life cycle and productivity of an intertidal population of the amphipod Ampelisca brevicornis. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, 12, 665–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaestner, A. 1970. Order Amphipoda. In Invertebrate Zoology, Crustacea, vol. 3, pp. 470–502. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mills, E.L. 1967. The biology of an ampeliscid amphipod crustacean sibling species pair. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 24, 305–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macquart-Moulin, C.Bourdillon, A.Cubizolles, F.Passelaigue, F. & Rasoanarivo, R. 1987. Un cas type de migration verticale ‘retard’ chez 1'amphipode Ampelisca typica. Journal of Plankton Re-search, 9, 785–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, J.S.Slattery, P.Silberstein, M. & O'Connor, E.F. 1984. Gray whale feeding on dense ampeliscid amphipod communities near Bamfield, British Columbia (Canada). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 62, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shillaker, R.O. & Moore, P.G. 1987. The biology of brooding in the amphipods Lembos ivebsteri Bate and Corophium bonnellii Milne Edwards. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 110, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar