Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T06:48:25.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Secretion of byssal threads and attachment strength of Mytilus galloprovincialis: the influence of size and food availability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2008

Jose M.F. Babarro ,
María José Fernández Reiriz  and
Uxío Labarta
Jose M.F. Babarro*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas CSIC, Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain
María José Fernández Reiriz
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas CSIC, Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain
Uxío Labarta
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas CSIC, Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Jose M.F. BabarroInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas CSICEduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Byssogenesis rate and attachment strength of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis were investigated in the laboratory considering different body sizes and feeding conditions. Byssal thread secretion was significantly higher in juveniles as compared to larger mussels of approximately 87 mm shell length. Asymptotic number of threads attached was obtained from approximately 72 hours onwards within a range of 42–46 and 27–31 for juveniles and larger experimental mussels, respectively (P < 0.05 ANOVA). Absorption efficiency values of control fed individuals dropped significantly from 0.78 in juveniles to 0.70 in larger mussels (P < 0.001 ANOVA) which pointed out energetic constraints of mussels with regard to their size and its probable effect on byssus secretion rates. Attachment force was 2.8 times higher in larger mussels than in juveniles (2.21 versus 0.78 N for both sizes, respectively; P < 0.001 ANOVA) which in turn followed the same order of magnitude than differences in the thread's thickness values of both experimental mussel sizes. Tenacity followed a reverse pattern with juveniles presenting two-fold higher values than larger mussels (P < 0.001 ANOVA) based on a lower increment of attachment force (x2.8) as compared to shell area (x6) for the comparison larger versus juvenile mussel size, which in turn might suggest that larger specimens secreted weaker threads. When animals were maintained unfed for a week, a significant drop in both byssus secretion and attachment force were observed in juveniles but was not the case for larger mussels most likely as a consequence of a relatively short period of maintenance under food availability stress for the latter individuals that showed significantly higher initial condition and/or energetic store values. Accordingly, the use of energetic reserves in juveniles kept unfed for a week together with a significant drop in byssus secretion and attachment force might suggest a link, i.e. transfer of energy between soft tissues and byssus under stress. Quantitative values of byssal threads, based on the significance of the byssus versus attachment force relationship, together with its morphometric value, i.e. thread's thickness, represented a primary mechanism to explain variability in attachment strength of M. galloprovincialis of the different body sizes studied here.

Keywords

Mytilus galloprovincialisbyssogenesisattachment strengthbody size
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 783 - 791
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, J.A., Cook, M., Jackson, D.J., Preston, S. and Worth, E.M. (1976) Observations on the rate of production and mechanical properties of the byssus threads of Mytilus edulis L. Journal of Molluscan Studies 42, 279–289.Google Scholar
Babarro, J.M.F., Fernández-Reiriz, M.J. and Labarta, U. (2000) Growth of seed mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk): effects of environmental parameters and seed origin. Journal of Shellfish Research 19, 187–193.Google Scholar
Babarro, J.M.F., Fernández-Reiriz, M.J. and Labarta, U. (2005) Byssogenesis of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis as a function of body size. Effects of starvation under laboratory conditions. In ASLO Summer Meeting (American Society of Limnology and Oceanography): Conference Abstracts, Santiago de Compostela (Spain), 19–24 June 2005, p. 11.Google Scholar
Bell, E.C. and Gosline, J.M. (1996) Mechanical design of mussel byssus: material yield enhances attachment strength. Journal of Experimental Biology 199, 1005–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, E.C. and Gosline, J.M. (1997) Strategies for life in flow: tenacity, morphometry, and probability of dislogement of two Mytilus species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 159, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, E. (2002) Seasonal variation in the attachment strength of blue mussels: causes and consequences. Limnology and Oceanography 47, 1723–1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. (1999) The effect of food availability on byssogenesis by the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha Pallas). Journal of Molluscan Studies 65, 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. and McMahon, R.F. (1996) Comparison of byssal attachment in Dreissenid and Mytilid mussels: mechanisms, morphology, secretion, biochemistry, mechanisms and environmental influences. Malacological Reviews 29, 1–16.Google Scholar
Conover, R.J. (1966) Assimilation of organic matter by zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 11, 338–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolmer, P. and Svane, I. (1994) Attachment and orientation of Mytilus edulis L. in flowing water. Ophelia 40, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckroat, L.R., Masteller, E.C., Shaffer, J.C. and Steel, L.M. (1993) The byssus of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha): morphology, byssal thread formation, and detattachment. In Nalepa, T.F. and Schoesser, D.W. (eds) Zebra mussels: biology, impact, and control. Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers, pp. 239–263.Google Scholar
Freeman, KR. (1974) Growth, mortality and seasonal cycle of Mytilus edulis in two Nova Scotian embayments. Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Canada, Technical Report No. 500, p. 112.Google Scholar
Hawkins, A.J.S. and Bayne, B.L. (1985) Seasonal variation in the relative utilization of carbon and nitrogen by the mussel Mytilus edulis: budgets, conversion efficiencies and maintenance requirements. Marine Ecology Progress Series 25, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, H. and Scheibling, R.E. (2001) Predicting wave dislodgement of mussels: variation in attachment strength with body size, habitat, and season. Marine Ecology Progress Series 213, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, T.E. and Valiela, I. (1982) A nitrogen budget of the ribbed mussel, Geukensia demissa, and its significance in nitrogen flow in a New England salt marsh. Limnology and Oceanography 27, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labarta, U. (2004) El mejillón, un paradigma bioeconómico. In Labarta, U., Fernández Reiriz, M.J., Pérez Camacho, A. and Pérez Corbacho, E. (eds) Bateeiros, mar, mejillón. Una perspective bioeconómica. Colección: Monografías. Serie: Estudios Sectoriales, Fundación CaixaGalicia, pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
Lee, C.Y., Shirley, S.L. and Owen, M.D. (1990) The rate and strength of byssal reattachment by blue mussels (Mytilus edulis L.). Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 2005–2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, G.H., Bertness, M.D. and Yund, P.O. (1999) Crab predation, waterborne cues, and inducible defenses in the blue mussel, M. edulis. Ecology 80, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martella, T. (1974) Some factors influencing byssus thread production in Mytilus edulis (Mollusca: Bivalvia) Linnaeus, 1758. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 3, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J.M. and Winter, J.E. (1982) Ingestion rate, assimilation efficiency and energy balance in Mytilus chilensis in relation to body size and different algal concentration. Marine Biology 67, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Camacho, A., Labarta, U. and Beiras, R. (1995) Growth of mussels (Mytilus edulis galloprovincialis) on cultivation rafts: influence of seed source, cultivation site and phytoplankton availability. Aquaculture 138, 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Camacho, A., Labarta, U. and Navarro, E. (2000) Energy balance of mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis: the effect of length and age. Marine Ecology Progress Series 199, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H.A. (1982) An analysis of factors determining seasonal variation in the byssal attachment strength of Mytilus edulis L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 62, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, O. and Harms-Ringdahl, S. (2001) Predator-inducible changes in blue mussels from the predator-free Baltic Sea. Marine Biology 139, 959–965 (DOI 10.1007/s002270100606).Google Scholar
Seed, R. and Suchanek, T.H. (1992) Population and community ecology of Mytilus. In Gosling, E.G. (ed.) The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics, and culture. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 87–169.Google Scholar
Seed, R. and Richardson, C.A. (1999) Evolutionary traits in Perna viridis (Linnaeus) and Septifer virgatus (Wiegmann) (Bivalvia: Mytilidae). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 239, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, J.D. and Parson, T.R. (1968) A practical handbook of sea water analysis. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 167, 173–174.Google Scholar
Van Winkle, W. (1970) Effect of environmental factors on byssal thread formation. Marine Biology (Berlin) 7, 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahl, O. (1973) Pumping and oxygen consumption rates of Mytilus edulis L. of different sizes. Ophelia 12, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdows, J. and Bayne, B.L. (1971) Temperature acclimation of Mytilus edulis with reference to its energy budget. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 51, 827–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, J.E. (1978) A review of the knowledge of suspension feeding in lamellibranchiate bivalves, with special reference to artificial aquaculture systems. Aquaculture 13, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, G.A. (1983) Response to and selection between, firm substrata by Mytilus edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 63, 653–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, G.A. (1985) Byssus-thread formation by the mussel Mytilus edulis: effects of environmental factors. Marine Ecology Progress Series 24, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar