Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:41:09.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal Abundance and Population Flux of Tigriopus Californicus (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) in Barkley Sound, British Columbia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

James J. Powlik
James J. Powlik
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Department of Oceanography, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The study describes the seasonal density and age structure for splashpool metapopulations of Tigriopus californicus (Copepoda: Harpacticoida). Natural populations were highly variable, ranging from 217 ± 401·7 ind 1−1 in winter (mean ± SE) to 835 ± 1750·6 ind 1−1 in summer, with some populations approaching 20,000 ind 1−1 in all seasons except winter. Male-to-female ratio ranged from 1·36 in spring and summer to 1·84 in autumn, and reproduction was observed throughout the year. Nauplii abundance averaged 28 + 7·4 ind 11, a value much lower than expected for in situ copepod populations and possibly due to behavioural processes such as cannibalism and inhibition of egg deposition. The densest assemblages of splashpool microcrustacea were almost entirely T. californicus, principally mature adults and including clasped male-female pairs and ovigerous females. A simple population growth model is presented, along with parameters for calculating the instantaneous rate of increase, birth, and death in the absence of disturbance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , May 1998 , pp. 467 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H., 1907. The education of Henry Adams, p.16. New York: Clarke & Sons.Google Scholar
Baker, C.F., 1912. Notes on the Crustacea of Laguna Beach. First Annual Report of the Laguna Marine Laboratory, 1, 100–117.Google Scholar
Belser, W.L., 1959. The research frontier: where is science taking us? Saturday Review, 48, 58.Google Scholar
Burton, R.S. & Feldman, M.W., 1981. Population genetics of Tigriopus californicus. II. Differentiation among neighboring populations. Evolution, 35, 1192–1205.Google ScholarPubMed
Comita, G.W. & Comita, J.J., 1966. Egg production in Tigriopus brevicornis. In Some contemporary studies in marine science (ed. H., Barnes), pp. 171–185. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Dethier, M.N., 1980. Tidepools as refuges: predation and the limits of the harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus californicus (Baker). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 42, 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybdahl, M.F., 1989. Evolutionary consequences of limited dispersal and environmental heterogeneity in Tigriopus californicus life histories. PhD thesis, University of California, Davis, USA.Google Scholar
Dybdahl, M.F., 1994. Extinction, recolonization, and the genetic structure of tidepool copepod populations. Evolutionary Ecology, 8, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybdahl, M.F., 1995. Selection on life history traits across a wave exposure gradient in the tidepool copepod Tigriopus californicus (Baker). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 192, 195–210.Google Scholar
Egloff, D.A., 1966. Biological aspects of sex ratio in experimental and field populations of the marine copepod Tigriopus californicus. PhD thesis, Stanford University, California, USA.Google Scholar
Feller, R.J., 1980. Quantitative cohort analysis of a sand-dwelling meiobenthic harpacticoid copepod. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 11, 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, J.H., 1936a. The distribution of rock pool copepoda according to tidal level. Journal of Animal Ecology, 5, 23–28.Google Scholar
Fraser, J.H., 1936b. The occurrence, ecology and life history of Tigriopus fulvus (Fischer). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 20, 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gannon, J.E. & Gannon, S.A., 1975. Observations on the narcotization of crustacean zooplankton. Crustaceana, 28, 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R.P., 1973. Feeding, growth, reproduction and nitrogen utilization by the harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus brevicornis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 35, 785–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huizinga, H.W., 1971. Cultivation, life history, and salinity tolerance of the tidepool copepod Tigriopus californicus Baker 1912 in artificial seawater. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Sciences, 64, 230–236.Google Scholar
Igarashi, S., 1959. On the relationship between the environmental conditions and the Tigriopus population. Bulletin. Marine Biology Station of Asamushi, 9, 167–171.Google Scholar
Igarashi, S., 1960. On the relationship between sex ratio and salinity as a regulator of growth speed in Tigriopus japonicus Mori. Bulletin. Marine Biology Station of Asamushi, 10, 103–108.Google Scholar
Itô, T., 1970. The biology of a harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus japonicus Mori, journal of the Faculty of Science. Series 6. Zoology. Hokkaido University, 17, 474–500.Google Scholar
Kahan, D., Berman, Y. & Bar-El, T., 1988. Maternal inhibition of hatching at high population densities in Tigriopus japonicus (Copepoda, Crustacea). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 174, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazzaretto, I. & Salvato, B., 1992. Cannibalistic behaviour in the harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus fulvus. Marine Biology, 113, 579–582.Google Scholar
Lee, C.-S. & Hu, F., 1981. Salinity tolerance and salinity effects on brood size of Tigriopus japonicus Mori. Aquaculture, 22, 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R.H., Abbott, D.P. & Haderlie, E.C., 1980. Intertidal invertebrates of California. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Paloheimo, J.E., 1974. Calculation of instantaneous birth rate. Limnology and Oceanography, 19, 692–694.Google Scholar
Powlik, J.J. & Lewis, A.G., 1996. Desiccation resistance in Tigriopus californicus (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 43, 521–532.Google Scholar
Powlik, J.J., Lewis, A.G. & Spaeth, M., 1997a. Development, body length, and feeding of Tigriopus californicus (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) in laboratory culture and field populations. Crustaceana, 70, 324–343.Google Scholar
Powlik, J.J., Lewis, A.G. & Verma, N., 1997b. The response of Tigriopus californicus to chlorophytic macroalgae, including Cladophora trichotoma Kützing. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 44, 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vacquier, V.D., 1962. Hydrostatic pressure has a selective effect on the copepod Tigriopus. Science, New York, 135, 724–725.Google Scholar
Vacquier, V.D. & Belser, W.L., 1965. Sex conversion induced by hydrostatic pressure in the marine copepod Tigriopus californicus. Science, New York, 150, 1619–1621.Google Scholar
Vittor, B.A., 1971. Effects of the environment on fitness-related life history characters in Tigriopus californicus. PhD thesis, University of Oregon, Eugene, USA.Google Scholar