Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:30:13.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resource partitioning among juvenile snappers in a semi-arid estuary in north-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2020

Silvia Yasmin Lustosa-Costa ,
Maria Rita Nascimento Duarte ,
Priscila Rocha Vasconcelos Araújo  and
André Luiz Machado Pessanha Open the ORCID record for André Luiz Machado Pessanha [Opens in a new window]
Silvia Yasmin Lustosa-Costa
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Campus I, Avenida das Baraúnas, 351, Bairro Universitário, 58429-500, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil
Maria Rita Nascimento Duarte
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Campus I, Avenida das Baraúnas, 351, Bairro Universitário, 58429-500, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil
Priscila Rocha Vasconcelos Araújo
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Campus I, Avenida das Baraúnas, 351, Bairro Universitário, 58429-500, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil
André Luiz Machado Pessanha*
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Campus I, Avenida das Baraúnas, 351, Bairro Universitário, 58429-500, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: André Luiz Machado Pessanha, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Resource partitioning is important for species coexistence. Species with similar ecomorphological characters have a high potential for competition, especially when close phylogenetically. The diet and resource partitioning of four snappers (Lutjanus alexandrei, L. analis, L. jocu and L. synagris) was studied in the Tubarão River, north-eastern Brazil, between March and November 2012. Specimens were caught using a beach seine, and a total of 731 stomachs were analysed. The highest abundance of snappers was found near to vegetated habitats in the middle estuary. Crustaceans were dominant in the diet of all four species, being found in over 90% of the stomachs, followed by fish and molluscs. The species did not appear to compete for common resources, probably because there was not always spatial overlap, and differences in the proportions of consumption of items were observed. Ontogenetic comparisons of dietary compositions suggested differences among species, with changes in the diet related to changes in the mouth area as the body size increased. The changes were more evident in L. analis and L. synagris where microcrustaceans (Calanoida, Cyclopoida and Amphipoda) were dominant in the diet of the smaller size classes, and benthic crustaceans (Brachyura) and fish in the diet of larger individuals. The intra- and inter-specific differences in the dietary compositions, differences in the mouth area and feeding strategy contribute to allow the co-existence of these snappers in the study area.

Keywords

HabitatshypersalineLutjanusPerciformestrophic ecologyTubarão River estuary
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 100 , Issue 5 , August 2020 , pp. 807 - 816
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdurahiman, KP, Nayak, TH, Mohamed, KS and Zacharia, PU (2010) Trophic organisation and predator-prey interactions among commercially exploited demersal finfishes in the coastal waters of the south eastern Arabian Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 87, 601–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adite, A and Winemiller, KO (1997) Trophic ecology and ecomorphology of fish assemblages in coastal lakes of Benin, West Africa. Ecoscience 4, 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvares, CA, Stape, JL, Sentelhas, PC, Gonçalves, JLM and Sparovek, G (2013) Köppen's climate classification map of Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22, 711–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim, E, Ramos, S, Elliott, M and Bordalo, AA (2016) Immigration and early life stages recruitment of the European flounder (Platichthys flesus) to an estuary nursery: the influence of environmental factors. Journal of Sea Research 107, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amundsen, PA, Gabler, HM and Staldvik, FJ (1996) A new approach to graphical analysis of feeding strategy from stomach contents data – modification of Costello (1990) method. Journal of Fish Biology 48, 607–614.Google Scholar
Anderson, MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26, 32–46.Google Scholar
Anderson, MJ, Gorley, RN and Clarke, KR (2008) PERMANOVA for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Araújo, ALF, Dantas, RP and Pessanha, ALM (2016) Feeding ecology of three juvenile mojarras (Gerreidade) in a tropical estuary of northeastern Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 14, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschenbrenner, A and Marques, S (2018) First record of foraging association between juveniles of endemic Brazilian snapper (Lutjanus alexandrei) and green moray at mangrove prop roots in the southwestern Atlantic. Marine Biodiversity 48, 1275–1276.Google Scholar
Aschenbrenner, A, Hackradt, CW and Ferreira, B (2016) Spatial variation in density and size structure indicate habitat selection throughout life stages of two Southwestern Atlantic snappers. Marine Environmental Research 113, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, MW, Heck, KL, Able, KW, Childers, DL, Eggleston, DB, Gillanders, BM, Halpern, B, Hays, CG, Hoshino, K, Minello, TJ, Orth, RJ, Sheridan, PF and Weinstein, MP (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioScience 51, 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bemvenuti, MA (1990) Hábitos alimentares de peixe-rei (Atherinidae) na região estuarina da Lagoa dos Patos. Atlântica 12, 79–102. (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
Boyle, KS and Horn, MH (2006) Comparison of feeding guild structure and ecomorphology of intertidal fish assemblages from central California and central Chile. Marine Ecology Progress Series 319, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, JS (1995) Role of feeding and prey distribution of summer and southern flounder in selection of estuarine nursery habitats. Journal of Fish Biology 47, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, RA and Tejerina-Garro, FL (2014) Environmental and spatial processes: what controls the functional structure of fish assemblage in tropical rivers and headwater streams? Ecology of Freshwater Fish 24, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, JE, Westneat, MW and Marshall, CD (2008) Feeding biomechanics of juvenile red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) from the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 3826–3835.Google ScholarPubMed
Castillo-Vargasmachuca, S, Ponce-Palafox, JT, Arredondo-Figueroa, JL, Chávez-Ortiz, E, Rodríguez-Chávez, G and Seidavi, A (2013) Effects of temperature and salinity on growth and survival of the Pacific red snapper Lutjanus peru (Pisces: Lutjanidae) juvenile. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 41, 1013–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, KR and Warwick, RM (2001) Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd Edn. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Clarke, KR, Somerfield, P and Gorley, RN (2008) Testing of null hypotheses in exploratory community analyses: similarity profiles and biota-environment linkage. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 366, 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocheret de la Moriniére, E, Pollux, BJA, Nagelkerken, I and Van der Velde, G (2003) Diet shifts of Caribbean grunts (Haemulidae) and snappers (Lutjanidae) and the relation with nursery-to-coral reef migrations. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57, 1079–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, MJ (1990) Predator feeding strategy and prey importance: a new graphical analysis. Journal of Fish Biology 36, 261–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doncel, O and Paramo, J (2010) Hábitos alimenticios del pargo rayado, Lutjanus synagris (Perciformes: Lutjanidae), en la zona norte del Caribe colombiano. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 38, 413–426. (In Spanish)Google Scholar
Dorenbosch, M, Vanriel, MC, Gelkerken, I and Van der Velde, G (2004) The relationship of reef fish densities to the proximity of mangrove and seagrass nurseries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 60, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
França, S, Vasconcelos, RP, Cabral, HN, Costa, MJ, Fonseca, VF, Reis-Santos, P and Tanner, SE (2012) Predicting fish community properties within estuaries: influence of habitat type and other environmental features. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 107, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, JS and VanderKooy, KE (2000) Feeding habits of juvenile lane snapper Lutjanus synagris from Mississippi coastal waters, with comments on the diet of gray snapper Lutjanus griseus. Gulf and Caribbean Research 12, 11–17.Google Scholar
Frédou, T, Ferreira, BP and Letourneur, Y (2009) Assessing the stocks of the primary snappers caught in Northeastern Brazilian reef systems. 1 – Traditional modeling approaches. Fishery Research 99, 90-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freitas, MO, Abilhoa, V and Silva, GHC (2011) Feeding ecology of Lutjanus analis (Teleostei: Lutjanidae) from Abrolhos Bank, Eastern Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 9, 411–418.Google Scholar
Harrison, TD and Whitfield, AK (2012) Fish trophic structure in estuaries, with particular emphasis on estuarine typology and zoogeography. Journal of Fish Biology 81, 2005–2029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyslop, EJ (1980) Stomach contents analysis – a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology 17, 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idema (1999) Instituto de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Meio Ambiente do Rio Grande do Norte. Macau. Informativo Municipal 5, 1–14. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
Igulu, MM, Nagelkerken, I, Fraaije, R, Ligtenberg, H, Mgaya, YD and Van Hintum, R (2011) The potential role of visual cues for microhabitat selection during the early life phase of a coral reef fish (Lutjanus fulviflamma). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 401, 118–125.Google Scholar
Kadison, E, Nemeth, RS and Blondeau, JE (2009) Assessment of an unprotected red hind (Epinephelus guttatus) spawning aggregation on the Saba Bank in the Netherland Antilles. Bulletin of Marine Science 85, 101–118.Google Scholar
Kamukuru, AT and Mgaya, YD (2004) The food and feeding habits of blackspot snapper, Lutjanus fulviflamma (Pisces: Lutjanidae) in shallow waters of Mafia Island, Tanzania. African Journal of Ecology 42, 49–58.Google Scholar
Karpouzi, VS and Stergiou, KI (2003) The relationships between mouth size and shape and body length for 18 species of marine fishes and their trophic implications. Journal of Fish Biology 62, 1353–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, CJ (1989) Ecological Methodology. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Labroupoulou, M and Eleftheriou, A (1997) The foraging ecology of two pairs of congeneric demersal fish species: importance of morphological characteristics in prey selection. Journal of Fish Biology 50, 324–340.Google Scholar
Ley, JA, McIvor, CC and Montague, CL (1999) Fishes in mangrove prop-root habitats of Northeastern Florida Bay: distinct assemblages across an estuarine gradient. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 48, 701–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshak, AR and Heck, KL Jr (2017) Interactions between range-expanding tropical fishes and the northern Gulf of Mexico red snapper Lutjanus campechanus. Journal of Fish Biology 91, 1139–1165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshak, AR and Heck, KL Jr (2019). Competitive interactions among juvenile and adult life stages of northern Gulf of Mexico red snapper Lutjanus campechanus and a tropical range-expanding congener. Marine Ecology Progress Series 622, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshak, AR, Heck, KL Jr and Jud, ZR (2018) Ecological interactions between Gulf of Mexico snappers (Teleostei: Lutjanidae) and invasive red lionfish (Pterois volitans). PLoS ONE 13, e0206749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, CRF, Costa, AKS, Lima, CSS, Oliveira, JM, Júnior, MMC, Silva, MRA, Gouveia, RSD, De Melo, JIM, Dias, TLP and Molozzi, J (2016) Environmental drivers of the benthic macroinvertebrates community in a hypersaline estuary (Northeastern Brazil). Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 18, e4. ISSN 0102-6712Google Scholar
Mendoza-Carranza, M and Vieira, JP (2009) Ontogenetic niche feeding partitioning in juvenile of white sea catfish Genidens barbus in estuarine environments, southern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 839–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, DP, Giarrizzo, T and Isaac, V (2009) Feeding ecology of juvenile dog snapper Lutjanus jocu (Bloch and Schneider, 1801) (Lutjanidae) in intertidal mangrove creeks in Curuçá estuary (Northern Brazil). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 52, 1421–1430.Google Scholar
Mueller, KW, Dennis, GD, Eggleston, DB and Wicklund, RI (1994) Size-specific social interactions and foraging styles in a shallow water population of mutton snapper, Lutjanus analis (Pisces: Lutjanidae), in the central Bahamas. Environmental Biology of Fishes 40, 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murie, DJ (1995) Comparative feeding ecology of two sympatric rockfish congeners, Sebastes caurinus (copper rockfish) and S. maliger (quillback rockfish). Marine Biology 124, 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagelkerken, I, Van der Velde, G, Gorissen, MW, Meijer, GJ, Van't Hof, T and Den Hartog, C (2000) Importance of mangroves, seagrass beds and the shallow coral reef as a nursery for important coral reef fishes, using a visual census technique. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 51, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osório, FM, Godinho, WO and Lotufo, TMC (2011) Ictiofauna associada às raízes de mangue do estuário do Rio Pacoti – CE, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 11, 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, CR and Joyeux, JC (2010) Diet and food partitioning between juveniles of mutton Lutjanus analis, dog Lutjanus jocu and lane Lutjanus synagris snappers (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) in a mangrove-fringed estuarine environment. Journal of Fish Biology 76, 2299–2317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkas, L, Oliphant, MS and Iverson, ILK (1971) Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters. California Sacramento, CA: State of California, Department of Fish and Game.Google Scholar
Previero, M, Minte-Vera, CV, Freitas, MO, Moura, RL and Tos, CD (2011) Age and growth of the dog snapper Lutjanus jocu (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) in Abrolhos Bank, Northeastern Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 9, 393-401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queiroz, RNM and Dias, TLP (2014) Molluscs associated with macroalgae of the genus Graciliaria (Rhodophyta): importance of algal fronds as microhabitat in a hypersaline mangrove in Northeast Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology (Impresso) 74, 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resende, SM, Ferreira, BP and Frédou, T (2003) A pesca de lutjanídeos no Nordeste do Brasil: histórico das pescarias, características das espécies e relevância para o manejo. Boletim Técnico Científico – CEPENE 11, 56–63. (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
Ross, ST (1986) Resource partitioning in fish assemblages: a review of field studies. Copeia 1986, 352–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sales, NS, Dias, TLP, Baeta, A and Pessanha, ALM (2016) Dependence of juvenile reef fishes on semi-arid hypersaline estuary microhabitats as nurseries. Journal of Fish Biology 89, 661–679.Google ScholarPubMed
Sales, NS, Dias, TLP, Baeta, A, Lima, LG and Pessanha, ALM (2018) Do the shallow-water habitats of a hypersaline tropical estuary act as nursery grounds for fishes? Marine Ecology 39, e12473. doi: 10.1111/maec.12473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarre, GA, Platell, ME and Potter, IC (2000) Do the dietary compositions of Acanthopagrus butcheri in four estuaries and a coastal lake vary with body size and season and within and amongst these water bodies? Journal of Fish Biology 56, 103–122.Google Scholar
Schafer, LN, Platell, ME, Potter, IC and Valesini, FJ (2002) Comparisons between the influence of habitat type, season and body size on the dietary compositions of fish species in nearshore marine waters. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 278, 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheaves, M (1995) Large lutjanid and serranid fishes in tropical estuaries: are they adults or juveniles? Marine Ecology Progress Series 129, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szedlmayer, TS and Lee, JD (2004) Diet shifts of juvenile red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) with changes in habitat and fish size. Fishery Bulletin 102, 366–375.Google Scholar
Tarnecki, JH and Patterson, WF (2015) Changes in red snapper diet and trophic ecology following the deepwater horizon oil spill. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 7, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, SF, Duarte, YF and Ferreira, BP (2010) Reproduction of the fish Lutjanus analis (mutton snapper) (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) from Northeastern Brazil. Revista de Biologia Tropical 58, 791–800.Google ScholarPubMed
Wells, RJD, Cowan, JH Jr and Fry, B (2008) Feeding ecology of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Marine Ecology Progress Series 361, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeager, LA, Layman, CA and Hammerschlag-Peyer, CM (2014) Diet variation of a generalist fish predator, grey snapper Lutjanus griseus, across an estuarine gradient: trade-offs of quantity for quality? Journal of Fish Biology 85, 264–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Yasmin Lustosa-Costa et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Yasmin Lustosa-Costa et al. supplementary material(File)
File 32 KB