Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:30:50.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive strategies of male and female Loligo forbesi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. A. Collins ,
G. M. Burnell  and
P. G. Rodhouse
M. A. Collins
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, Cork, Ireland. British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OET.
G. M. Burnell
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, Cork, Ireland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The reproductive strategies of male and female Loligo forbesi Steenstrup, 1856 were investigated from samples obtained from commercial catches and research cruises in Irish waters. In females maturity increased with size, but in males two modes in the size at maturity were identified, with approximately 40% mature at small size (180–200 mm mantle length), and the remainder mature at >250 mm mantle length. The difference in estimated age of the two modes of mature males was small, so size differences were probably due to different growth rates. Growth and maturation proceeded together in both sexes over much of the life-cycle. The effect of maturation on relative growth of somatic tissues was examined using analysis of covariance and multivariate regressions. In males there was a significant decline in total mass, and in mass of mantle, head and viscera, relative to mantle length with maturation. In females total mass was not significantly affected by maturation, but relative masses of head, mantle and viscera declined with maturation, indicating that energy was diverted from somatic growth to gonad production. Potential fecundity estimates were obtained by counting eggs and ova in the oviduct and ovary of mature females and were in the range 2500 to 10,500 (mean 5800). Fecundity was positively related to mantle length. The ovaries of mature females contained a range of egg sizes and developmental stages, indicating that spawning probably occurs intermittently.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , August 1995 , pp. 621 - 634
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, J.M. & Williams-Arnold, L.D., 1977. Cephalopoda: Decapoda. In Reproduction of marine invertebrates. Vol. 4. Molluscs, gastropods and cephalopods (ed. A.C., Giese and J.S., Pearse), pp. 243–290. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, P.R. & Ngoile, M.A.K., 1993. Assessment of maturity state and seasonality of reproduction in Loligo forbesi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) from Scottish waters. In Recent advances in cephalopod fisheries biology (ed. T., Okutani et al.), pp. 37–48. Tokyo: Tokai University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, P.R., Pierce, G.J. & Hastie, L.C., 1995. Flexible reproductive strategies in the squid Loligo forbesi. Marine Biology, 121, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calow, P., 1987. Fact and theory - an overview. In Cephalopod life cycles. Vol. II. Comparative reviews (ed. P.R., Boyle), pp. 351–365. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collins, M.A., Burnell, G.M. & Rodhouse, P.G., 1995. Age and growth of the squid Loligo forbesi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in Irish waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 75, 605–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, M.A., Burnell, G.M. & Rodhouse, P.G., in press a. Recruitment, maturation and spawning of Loligo forbesi Steenstrup (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in Irish waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, M.A., Burnell, G.M. & Rodhouse, P.G., in press b. Demography and distribution of Loligo forbesi in the Irish Sea. Biology and Environment. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.Google Scholar
Durward, R.D., Amaratunga, T. & O'dor, R.K., 1979. Maturation index and fecundity for female squid, Illex illecebrosus (LeSueur, 1821). International Commission for Northwest Atlantic Fisheries (ICNAF), Research Bulletin no. 14, 67–72.Google Scholar
Fields, W.G., 1965. The structure, development, food relations, reproduction and life history of the squid, Loligo opalescens Berry. Fish Bulletin. Department of Fish and Game, California, 131,1–108.Google Scholar
Forsythe, J.F. & Van Heukelem, W.F., 1987. Growth. In Cephalopod life cycles. Vol. II. Comparative reviews (ed. P.R., Boyle), pp. 135–156. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garci'a-Berthou, E. & Moreno-Amich, R., 1993. Multivariate analysis of covariance in morphometric studies of the reproductive cycle. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50,1394–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerra, A. & Castro, B.G., 1994. Reproductive-somatic relationships in Loligo gahi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) from the Falkland Islands. Antarctic Science, 6,175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerra, A. & Rocha, F., 1994. The life history of Loligo vulgaris and Loligo forbesi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in Galician waters (NW Spain). Fisheries Research, 21, 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, R.F., Young, R.E., Reid, S.B., Mangold, K.M., Suzuki, T. & Hixon, R.F., 1989. Evidence for multiple spawning in the tropical oceanic squid Stenoteuthis oualaniensis (Teuthoidea: Ommastrephidae). Marine Biology, 101, 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, E.M.C., 1992. Recruitment, demography and growth of the Patagonian squid Loligo gahi (d'Orbigny) in the Falkland Islands.. PhD thesis, CNNA.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E.M.C., Rodhouse, P.G. & Barber, D.L., 1992. Production of soma and gonad in maturing female Illex argentinus (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 72, 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holme, N.A., 1974. The biology of Loligo forbesi Steenstrup (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in the Plymouth area. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juanico, M., 1983. Squid maturity scales for population analysis. In Advances in assessment of world cephalopod resources (ed. J.F., Caddy), pp. 341–378. Rome: Fao. [FAO Fisheries Technical Paper no 231.]Google Scholar
Kirkendall, L.R. & Stenseth, N.C., 1985. On defining ‘breeding once’. American Naturalist, 125, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knipe, J.H. & Beeman, R.D., 1978. Histological observations on oogenesis in Loligo opalescens. Fish Bulletin. Department of Fish and Game, California, 169, 23–34.Google Scholar
Lewis, A.R. & Choat, J.H., 1993. Spawning mode and reproductive output of the tropical cephalopod Idiosepius pygmaeus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50, 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipinski, M.R., 1979. Universal maturity scale for the commercially-important squids (Cephalopoda: Teuthoidea). The results of the maturity classification of Illex illecebrosus (LeSueur, 1821) population for years 1973–1977. International Commission for Northwest Atlantic Fisheries (ICNAF), Research Document 79/11/38. Serial no. 5364,40 pp.Google Scholar
Lum-Kong, A., Pierce, G.J. & Yau, C, 1992. Timing of spawning and recruitment in Loligo forbesi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in Scottish waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 72, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangold, K., 1987. Reproduction. In Cephalopod life cycles. Vol. II Comparative reviews (ed. P.R., Boyle), pp. 157–200. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mangold, K.M., Young, R.E. & Nixon, M., 1993. Growth versus maturation in cephalopods. In Recent advances in cephalopod fisheries biology (ed. T., Okutani et al.), pp. 697–703. Tokyo: Tokai University Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, G.J., Boyle, P.R., Hastie, L.C. & Key, L., 1994. The life history of Loligo forbesi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in Scottish waters. Fisheries Research, 21, 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodaniche, A.D., 1984. Iteroparity in the lesser striped octopus Octopus chierchiae (Jatta, 1889). Bulletin of Marine Science, 35, 99–104.Google Scholar
Rodhouse, P.G. & Hatfield, E.M.C., 1992. Production of soma and gonad in maturing male Illex argentinus (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 72, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodhouse, P.G., Swinfen, R.C. & Murray, A.W.A., 1988. Life cycle, demography and reproductive investment in the myopsid squid Alloteuthis subulata. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 45,245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, C.F.E., Sweeney, M.J. & Nauen, C.E., 1984. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 3. Cephalopods of the world: an annotated and illustrated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. Rome: FAO. [FAO Fisheries Synopsis, no 125(3).]Google Scholar
Ryan, B.F., Joiner, B.L. & Ryan, T.A., 1985. Minitab handbook. Boston: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J., 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Summers, W.C., 1971. Age and growth of Loligo pealei, a population study of the common Atlantic coast squid. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 141, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voss, G.L, 1983. A review of cephalopod fisheries biology. Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria, 44, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worms, J., 1983. Loligo vulgaris. In Cephalopod life cycles. Vol. I. Species accounts (ed. P.R., Boyle), pp. 143–157. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar