Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:30:42.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive morphology and mating behaviour in the hingebeak shrimp Rhynchocinetes durbanensis Gordon, 1936 (Decapoda: Caridea: Rhynchocinetidae) in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2015

Sanjeevi Prakash ,
Thipramalai Thangappan Ajithkumar ,
Raymond Bauer ,
Martin Thiel  and
Thanumalaya Subramoniam
Sanjeevi Prakash
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Porto Novo-608 502, Tamil Nadu, India Centre for Climate Change Studies, Sathyabama University, Jeppiaar Nagar, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 119, Tamil Nadu, India
Thipramalai Thangappan Ajithkumar
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Porto Novo-608 502, Tamil Nadu, India National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources (ICAR), Canal Ring Road, Dilkusha Post, Lucknow-226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India
Raymond Bauer
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana 70504-2451, USA
Martin Thiel
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile Millennium Nucleus Ecology and Sustainable Management of Oceanic Island (ESMOI), Coquimbo, Chile Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA), Coquimbo, Chile
Thanumalaya Subramoniam*
Affiliation:
Centre for Climate Change Studies, Sathyabama University, Jeppiaar Nagar, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 119, Tamil Nadu, India
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:T. Subramoniam, Centre for Climate Change Studies, Sathyabama University, Jeppiaar Nagar, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 119, Tamil Nadu, India. email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study tests hypotheses about sexual dimorphism in body size and morphology versus differential mating behaviours of three male ontogenetic stages (typus, intermedius and robustus morphotypes) of the hingebeak shrimp Rhynchocinetes durbanensis Gordon using canonical discriminant analysis. There is strong sexual dimorphism in this species, in that robustus morphotypes are greater in size and with larger appendages (extended third maxillipeds and major [first] chelipeds) than females. As typus males grow bigger in size, their third maxillipeds and major chelipeds become proportionately larger than those of females, and the numbers of corneous spines on the terminal segment of the maxillipeds are reduced. Although there is no sexual dimorphism in body size between typus and intermedius males and females, the robustus males are often substantially larger than females. During mating and spermatophore transfer, all male morphotypes performed similar behaviours (touching, overlapping and holding), but only intermedius and robustus morphotypes appeared to fertilize the broods of the females successfully. Robustus males were faster in approaching as well as mating with receptive females than subordinate males. When mating with robustus males, females spawned more quickly than after mating with typus and intermedius males. Additionally, the time taken for spermatophore transfer by typus males was longer. Rejection by females during the initial approach by typus males often resulted in unsuccessful spermatophore attachment. Results of this study suggest a dominance hierarchy in R. durbanensis similar to certain other rhynchocinetid species in which females appear to prefer mating with the larger robustus males.

Keywords

CarideaRhynchocinetes durbanensismorphotypesmale ontogenymating events
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 96 , Issue 6 , September 2016 , pp. 1331 - 1340
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baeza, J.A. and Anker, A. (2008) Lysmata hochi n. sp., a new hermaphroditic shrimp from the southwestern Caribbean sea (Caridea: Hippolytidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 28, 148–155.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A., Bauer, R.T., Okuno, J. and Thiel, M. (2014a) Molecular phylogeny of hinge-beak shrimps (Decapoda: Caridea: Rhynchocinetes and Cinetorhyncus) and allies: a formal test of familiar and generic monophyly using a multilocus phylogeny. Zoological Journal of Linnaen Society 172, 426–450.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A., Behringer, D.C., Hart, R.J., Dickson, M.D. and Anderson, J.R. (2014b) Reproductive biology of the marine ornamental shrimp Lysmata boggessi in the south-eastern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 94, 141–149.Google Scholar
Bailie, D.A., Fitzpatrick, S., Connolly, M., Thiel, M. and Prodöhl, P.A. (2014) A genetic assessment of parentage in a caridean rock shrimp species (Rhynchocinetes typus) based on microsatellite markers. Journal of Crustacean Biology 34, 658–662.Google Scholar
Bauer, R.T. (1977) Antifouling adaptations of marine shrimp (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea): functional morphology and adaptive significance of antennular preening by the third maxillipeds. Marine Biology 40, 261–276.Google Scholar
Bauer, R.T. (1986) Phylogenetic trends in sperm transfer and storage complexity in decapods crustaceans. Journal of Crustacean Biology 6, 313–325.Google Scholar
Bauer, R.T. (2000) Simultaneous hermaphroditism in caridean shrimps: a unique and puzzling sexual system in the Decapoda. Journal of Crustacean Biology 20, 116–128.Google Scholar
Bauer, R.T. (2004) Remarkable shrimps: adaptations and natural history of the carideans. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 282 pp.Google Scholar
Bauer, R.T., Okuno, J. and Thiel, M. (2014) Inferences on mating and sexual systems of two Pacific Cinetorhynchus shrimps (Decapoda, Rhynchocinetidae) based on sexual dimorphism in body size and cheliped weaponry. Zookeys 457, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, R.T. and Thiel, M. (2011) First description of pure search mating system and protandry in the shrimp Rhynchocinetes uritai (Decapoda: Caridea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 31, 286–295.Google Scholar
Calado, R. (2008) Marine ornamental shrimp: biology, aquaculture and conservation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 280 pp.Google Scholar
Calado, R., Lin, J., Rhyne, A.L., Araujo, R. and Narciso, L. (2003) Marine ornamental decapods – popular, pricey and poorly studied. Journal of Crustacean Biology 23, 963–973.Google Scholar
Chace, F.A. (1997) The Caridean Shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) of the Albatross Philippine Expedition, 1907–1910, Part 7: Families Atyidae, Eugonatonotidae, Rhynchocinetidae, Bathypalaemonellidae, Processidae and Hippolytidae. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 106 pp.Google Scholar
Chow, S., Ogasawara, Y. and Taki, Y. (1982) Male reproductive system and fertilization of the palaemonid shrimp Macrobrachium rosenbergii . Bulletin of Japanese Society for Science and Fishery 48, 177–183.Google Scholar
Correa, C., Baeza, J.A., Dupre, E., Hinojosa, I.A. and Thiel, M. (2000) Mating behavior and fertilization success of three ontogenetic stages of male rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 20, 628–640.Google Scholar
Correa, C., Baeza, J.A., Hinojosa, I.A. and Thiel, M. (2003) Male dominance hierarchy and mating tactics in the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 23, 33–45.Google Scholar
Correa, C. and Thiel, M. (2003a) Mating systems in caridean shrimp (Decapoda: Caridea) and their evolutionary consequences for sexual dimorphism and reproductive biology. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 76, 187–203.Google Scholar
Correa, C. and Thiel, M. (2003b) Population structure and operational sex ratio in the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 23, 849–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray, 845 pp.Google Scholar
Dennenmoser, S. and Thiel, M. (2007) Competition for food and mates by dominant and subordinate male rock shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typus . Behaviour 144, 33–59.Google Scholar
Dinesh Babu, A.P. and Zacharia, P.U. (2007) An assemblage of marine ornamental shrimp Rhynchocientes durbanensis off Karnataka coast. Marine Fisheries and Information Service Technical and Extension series No. 192 , p. 14.Google Scholar
Emlen, S.T. and Oring, L.W. (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215–223.Google Scholar
Gordon, I. (1936) On the macruran genus Rhynchocinetes, with description of a new species. Proceedings of Zoological Society of London 1936, 75–88.Google Scholar
Jayachandran, K.V. (1998) The taxonomic status of Macrobrachium birmanicum (Schenkel) and M. choprai (Tiwari) with a note on closely related species. Indian Journal of Fisheries 45, 345–348.Google Scholar
Jensen, G.C. (2014) Crabs and shrimps of the Pacific coast: a guide to the shallow water decapods from Southeastern Alaska to the Mexican Coast. Bremerton, WA: MolaMarine, 240 pp.Google Scholar
Konan, M.K., Allassane, O., Beatrice, A.A. and Germain, G. (2008) Morphometric differentiation between two sympatric Macrobrachium Bates 1868 shrimps (Crustacea Decapoda Palaemonidae) in West-African rivers. Journal of Natural History 42, 2095–2115.Google Scholar
Kuris, A.M., Ra'anan, Z., Sagi, A. and Cohen, D. (1987) Morphotypic differentiation of male Malaysian giant prawns. Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Journal of Crustacean Biology 7, 219–237.Google Scholar
Lee, C.L. and Fielder, D.R. (1982) Maintenance and reproductive behavior in the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium australiense Holthuis, 1950 (Decapoda: Palaemonidae). Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 33, 629–646.Google Scholar
Mariappan, P. and Balasundaram, C. (2004) Studies on the morphometry of Macrobrachium nobilii (Decapoda, Palaemonidae). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 47, 441–449.Google Scholar
Moraes-Riodades, P.M.C. and Valenti, W.C. (2004) Morphotypes in male Amazon River prawns, Macrobrachium amazonicum . Aquaculture 236, 297–307.Google Scholar
Norusis, M.J. (2009) SPSS 16.0 guide to data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 672 pp.Google Scholar
Okuno, J. and Takeda, M. (1992) Distinction between two hinge-beak shrimps, Rhynchocinetes durbanensis Gordon and R. uritai Kubo (Family Rhynchocinetidae). Revue Française d'Aquariologie y Herpétologie 19, 85–90.Google Scholar
Onaga, H.G., Fiedler, C. and Baeza, J.A. (2012) Protandric simultaneous hermaphroditism in Parhippolyte misticia (Clark, 1989) (Caridea: Hippolytidae): implications for the evolution of mixed sexual systems in shrimp. Journal of Crustacean Biology 32, 383–394.Google Scholar
Ory, N.C., Dudgeon, D., Duprey, N. and Thiel, M. (2014) Effects of predation on diel activity and habitat use of the coral-reef shrimp Cinetorhynchus hendersoni (Rhynchocinetidae). Coral Reefs 33, 639–650.Google Scholar
Prakash, S. and Ajithkumar, T.T. (2013) On a record of Rhynchocinetes durbanensis Gordon, 1936 (Decapoda: Caridea: Rhynchocinetidae) in Gulf of Mannar, Tamilnadu, India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 110, 163–165.Google Scholar
Ra'anan, Z. and Sagi, A. (1985) Alternative mating strategies in male morphotypes in freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man). Biological Bulletin 169, 592–601.Google Scholar
Rojas, R., Morales, M.C., Rivadeneira, M.M. and Thiel, M. (2012) Male morphotypes in the Andean river shrimp Cryphiops caementarius (Decapoda: Caridea): morphology, coloration and injuries. Journal of Zoology 288, 21–32.Google Scholar
Subramoniam, T. (2013) Origin and occurrence of sexual and mating systems in Crustacea: a progression towards communal living and eusociality. Journal of Biosciences 38, 951–969.Google Scholar
Thiel, M., Chak, S.T.C. and Dumont, C.P. (2010) Male morphotypes and mating behavior of the dancing shrimp Rhynchocinetes brucei (Decapoda: Caridea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 30, 580–588.Google Scholar
Thiel, M. and Hinojosa, I.A. (2003) Mating behavior of female rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea) – indication for convenience polyandry and cryptic female choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55, 113–121.Google Scholar
Tirmizi, N.M. and Kazmi, M.A. (1971) Sexual dimorphism in Saron marmoratus (Olivier) (Decapoda, Hippolytidae). Crustaceana 21, 283–293.Google Scholar
Warheit, K.I. (1992) The role of morphometrics and cladistics in the taxonomy of fossils: a paleornithological example. Systemic Biology 41, 345–369.Google Scholar
Wickler, W. and Seibt, U. (1981) Monogamy in crustacea and man. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 57, 215–234.Google Scholar
Zacharia, P.U., Krishnakumar, P.K., Dineshbabu, A.P., Vijayakumaran, K., Rohit, P., Thomas, S., Sasikumar, G., Kaladharan, P., Durgekar, R.N. and Mohamed, K.S. (2008) Species assemblage in the coral reef ecosystem of Netrani Island off Karnataka along the Southwest Coast of India. Journal of Marine Biological Association India 50, 87–97.Google Scholar